Working to rule, or working safely

Trapping Safety into Rules: How Desirable or Avoidable is Proceduralization?

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 43-68

  Hale, Andrew ^a   Borys, David ^b  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BALLARAT   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900186969     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (144)

1. Åberg, L. 1998. Traffic rules and traffic safety. Safety Science, 16(1), 205-16.
2. Adler, P., Goldoftas, B. and Levine, D. 1999. Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organization Science, 10(1), 43-68.
3. Alper, S. and Karsh, B-T. 2009. A systematic review of safety violations in industry. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 41(4), 739-54.
4. Alper, S.J., Holden, R.J., Scanlon, M.C., Kaushal, R, Shalaby, T.M. and Karsh, B. 2007. Using the Technology Acceptance Model to predict violations in the medication use process. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 51st Annual Meeting.
5. Alper, S.J., Holden, R.J., Scanlon, M.C., Patel, N., Murkowski, K., Shalaby, T.M. and Karsh, B. 2008a. Violation prevalence after introduction of a bar-coded medication administration system. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Healthcare System Ergonomics and Patient Safety. Strasbourg.
6. Alper, S.J., Scanlon, M.C., Murkowski, K., Patel, N., Kaushal, R. and Karsh, B. 2008b. Routine and situational violations during medication administration. In Sznelwar, L., Mascia, F. and Montedo, U. (eds), Human Factors in Organizational Design and Management IX. Santa Monica, CA: IEA Press, 81-6.
7. Amalberti, R. 2001. The paradoxes of almost totally safe transportation systems. Safety Science, 37(2-3), 109-26.
8. Amalberti, R., Vincent, C., Auroy, Y. and de Saint Maurice, G. 2006. Violations and migrations in health care: A framework for understanding and management. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 15(Suppl. 1), i66-i71.
9. Argyris, C. and Schön, D. 1978. Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
10. Baker, E. 1979. Predicting response to hurricane warnings: A reanalysis of data from four studies. Mass Emergencies, 4, 9-24.
11. Battmann, W. and Klumb, P. 1993. Behavioural economics and compliance with safety regulations. Safety Science, 16(1), 35-46.
12. Bax, E.H., Stejn, B.J. and De Witte, M.C. 1998. Risk management at the shop floor: The perception of formal rules in high-risk work situations. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 6, 177-88.
13. Becker, M. 2005a. The concept of routines: Some clarifications. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 29(2), 249-62.
14. Becker, M. 2005b. A framework for applying organizational routines in empirical research: Linking antecedents, characteristics and performance outcomes of recurrent interaction patterns. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(5), 817-46.
15. Becker, M., Lazaric, N., Nelson, R. and Winter, S. 2005. Applying organizational routines in understanding organizational change. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(5), 775-91.
16. Besnard, D. and Greathead, D. 2003. A cognitive approach to safe violations. Cognition, Technology and Work, 5(4), 272-82.
17. Blakstad, H.C. 2006. Revising rules and reviving knowledge: Adapting hierarchical and risk-based approaches to safety rule modifications in the Norwegian Railway System. PhD dissertation. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim.
18. Blackstad, H.C., Hovden, J., and Rosness, R. 2010. Reverse invention: An inductive bottom-up strategy for safety rule development: A case study of safety rule modifications in the Norwegian railway system. Safety Science, 48(3), 382-94.
19. Borys, D. 2007. Exploring risk awareness as a cultural approach to safety: An ethnographic study of a contract maintenance environment. PhD dissertation. University of Ballarat, School of Science and Engineering.
20. Borys D. 2012. The role of safe work method statements in the Australian construction industry. Safety Science, 50(2), 210-20.
21. Bourrier, M. 1996. Organizing maintenance work at two American nuclear power plants. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 4(2), 104-12.
22. Boyce, T.E. and Geller, E.S. 2001. Applied behavior analysis and occupational safety: The challenge of response maintenance. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 21(1), 31-60.
23. Brady, F. 1987. Rules for making exceptions to rules. Academy of Management Review, 12(3), 436-44.
24. British Standards Institution. 2008. OHSAS 18002:2008. Occupational health and safety management systems. Guidelines for the implementation of OHSAS 18001:2007. London: BSI.
25. Bruns, H. 2009. Leveraging functionality in safety routines: Examining the divergence of rules and performance. Human Relations, 62(9), 1399-1426.
26. CIRAS 2007. Are rules really made to be broken? The Reporter, 12(1) (1 February 2007). Confidential Incident Reporting and Analysis System (CIRAS), Rail Safety and Standards Board (RSSB), London.
27. Clarke, S. 2006. The relationship between safety climate and safety performance: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(4), 315-27.
28. Conchie, S. and Donald, I. 2008. The functions and development of safety-specific trust and distrust. Safety Science, 46(1), 92-103.
29. Corrigan, S. 2002. Comparative analysis of safety management systems and safety culture in aircraft maintenance. PhD dissertation. Trinity College, Dublin.
30. DEGAS. 2010. Regels als gestolde ervaring (Rules as concentrated (solidified) experience). Dutch Expert Group Aviation Safety. Advice 2010-053. http://www.adviescollege-degas.nl/
31. DeJoy, D.M. 2005. Behavior change versus culture change: Divergent approaches to managing workplace safety. Safety Science, 43(2), 105-29.
32. Dekker, S.W.A. 2003. Failure to adapt or adaptations that fail: Contrasting models on procedures and safety. Applied Ergonomics, 34(3), 233-8.
33. Dekker, S.W.A. 2005. Ten Questions about Human Error: A New View of Human Factors and System Safety. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. De Pasquale, J.P. and Geller, E.S. 1999. critical success factors for behaviorbased safety: a study of twenty industry-wide applications. Journal of Safety Research, 30(4), 237-49.
35. Diaz-Cabrera, D., Hernandez-Fernaud, E. and Isla-Diaz, R. 2007. An evaluation of a new instrument to measure organisational safety culture values and practices. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 39(6), 1202-1211.
36. Dien, Y. 1998. Safety and application of procedures, or 'how do 'they' have to use operating procedures in nuclear power plants?' Safety Science, 29(3) 179-88.
37. Drach-Zahavy, A. and Somech, A. 2010 Implicit as compared with explicit safety procedures: The experience of Israeli nurses. Qualitative Health Research, 20(10) 1406-1417.
38. Elling, M.G.M. 1991. Veiligheidsvoorschriften in de industrie (Safety rules in industry). PhD dissertation. University of Twente, Faculty of Philosophy and Social Sciences Publication WMW No.8, Netherlands.
39. Embrey, D. 1999. Preventing human error: Developing a best practice safety culture. Paper to the Berkeley Conference International conference, Achieving a step change in safety performance, Barbican Centre, London, February.
40. Energy Institute. 2008. Managing Rule Breaking: The Toolkit. www.energyinst.org.uk/heartsandminds.
41. Farrington-Darby, T., Pickup, L. and Wilson, J. 2005. Safety culture in railway maintenance. Safety Science, 43(1), 39-60.
42. Feldman, M. and Pentland, B. 2003. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 94-118.
43. Fleury, D. 1998. Reinforcing the rules or integrating behavioural responses into road planning. Safety Science, 16(1), 217-28.
44. Flin, R., Mearns, K., O'Connor, P. and Bryden, R. 2000. Measuring safety climate: identifying the common features. Safety Science, 34(1-3), 177-92.
45. Free, R. 1994. The role of procedural violations in railway accidents. PhD dissertation. University of Manchester.
46. Fucks, I. and Dien, Y. 2012. 'No Rule, No Use'? The Effects of Overproceduralization. This volume, Chapter 2.
47. Geller, E.S. 1998. Understanding Behaviour-Based Safety: Step by Step Methods to Improve Your Workplace. 2nd edn. Neenah, Wisconsin: J.J. Keller & Associates.
48. Gherardi, S. and Nicolini, D. 2000. To transfer is to transform: The circulation of safety knowledge. Organization, 7(2), 329-48.
49. Grote, G. 2006. Rules management as source for loose coupling in high-risk systems. Second Resilience Engineering Symposium. Juan les Pins, France.
50. Grote, G. 2009. Coordination in high-risk organizations: The need for flexible routines. Cognition, Technology & Work, 11(1), 17-27.
51. Guldenmund, F. 2000. The nature of safety culture: A review of theory and research. Safety Science, 34(1-3), 215-57.
52. Hale, A.R. and Borys, D. 2012a. Working to rule or working safely? Part 1: A state of the art review. Safety Science, (in press).
53. Hale, A.R. and Borys, D. 2012. Working to rule or working safely? Part 2: The management of safety rules and procedures. Safety Science, (in press).
54. Hale, A.R., Goossens, L.H.J., Ale, B.J.M., Bellamy, L.A., Post, J., Oh, J.I.H. and Papazoglou, I. A. 2004. Managing safety barriers and controls at the workplace. In Mosleh, A. & Bari,R.A. (eds) Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 608-13.
55. Hale, A.R. and Guldenmund, F.G. 2004. Aramis Audit Manual. Safety Science Group, Delft University of Technology. Version 1.3.
56. Hale, A.R., Guldenmund, F.W., van Loenhout, P.L.C.H. and Oh, J.I.H. 2010a. Evaluating safety management and culture interventions to improve safety: Effective intervention strategies. Safety Science, 48(8), 1026-1035.
57. Hale, A.R., Jacobs, J. and Oor, M. 2010b. Safety culture change in two companies. Proceedings of the International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management. Seattle, Washington.
58. Hale, A. and Swuste, P. 1998. Safety rules: Procedural freedom or action constraint. Safety Science, 29(3), 163-77.
59. Hersey, P., Blanchard, K.H. and Johnson, D.E. 2007. Management of Organizational Behavior: Leading Human Resources. 9th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
60. HFRG. 1995. Improving Compliance with Safety Procedures: Reducing Industrial Violations. Human Factors in Reliability Group. London: Health & Safety Executive, HMSO.
61. Hofmann, D. and Morgeson, F. 1999. Safety-related behavior as a social exchange: The role of perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(2), 286-96.
62. Hollnagel, E., Woods, D.D. and Leveson, N. (eds). 2006. Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts. Aldershot: Ashgate.
63. Hopkins, A. 2007. Lessons from Gretley: Mindful Leadership and the Law. Sydney: CCH Australia.
64. Hopkins, A. 2010. Risk Management and Rule Compliance Decision-making in Hazardous Industries (Working Paper 72). Canberra: National Research Centre for OHS Regulation.
65. Howell, G., Ballard, G., Abdelhamid, T. and Mitropoulos, P. 2002. Working near the edge: A new approach to construction safety. Proceedings IGLC-10, August 2002, Gramado, Brazil.
66. Hudson, P., Parker, D., Lawton, R. and van der Graaf, G. 2000. Bending the rules: Managing violation in the workplace. International Conference of the Society of Petroleum Engineers. http://www.energyinst.org.uk/heartsandminds/docs/bending.pdf.
67. Høyland, S., Aase K., Hollund, J.G. and Haugen, A. 2010. What Is It about Checklists? Exploring Safe Work Practices in Surgical Teams. This volume, Chapter 7.
68. ILCI (International Loss Control Institute). 1990. International Safety Rating System (ISRS). Loganville, GA: ILCI.
69. Iszatt-White, M. 2007. Catching them at it: An ethnography of rule violation. Ethnography, 8(4), 445-65.
70. Jeffcott, S., Pidgeon, N., Weyman, A. and Walls, J. 2006. Risk, trust, and safety culture in U.K. train operating companies. Risk Analysis, 26(5), 1105-21.
71. Katz-Navon, T., Naveh, E. and Stern, Z. 2005. Safety climate in health care organizations: A multidimensional approach. Academy of Management Journal, 84 (6), 1075-89.
72. Keil Centre. 2002. Strategies to Promote Safe Behaviour as a Part of a Health and Safety Management System. Contract Research Report 430/2002. Sheffield: Health & Safety Executive.
73. Knudsen, F. 2009. Paperwork at the service of safety? Workers' reluctance against written procedures exemplified by the concept of 'seamanship'. Safety Science, 47(2), 285-303.
74. Komaki, J., Barwick, K. and Scott, L. 1978. A behavioral approach to occupational safety: Pinpointing and reinforcing safe performance in a food manufacturing plant. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(4), 434-45.
75. Koornneef, F. 2000. Learning from small-scale incidents. Ph.D. dissertation. Safety Science Group, Delft University of Technology.
76. Kramer, R. 1999. Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 569-98.
77. Krause, T.R, Seymour, K.J. and Sloat, K.C.M. 1999. Long-term evaluation of a behavior-based method for improving safety performance: A meta-analysis of 73 interrupted time-series replications. Safety Science, 32(1), 1-18.
78. Labour Inspectorate. 1989. Procedures in the Process Industry: examples and proposals concerning development, introduction and control of procedures in the process industry. Directorate-General of Labour, Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment, Voorburg NL.
79. Laitinen, H. and Ruohomäki, I. 1996. The effects of feedback and goal setting on safety performance at two construction sites. Safety Science, 24(1), 64-73.
80. Lamvik, G.M., Naesje, P.C., Skarholt, K. and Torvatn, H. 2009. Paperwork, management and safety: Towards a bureaucratization of working life and a lack of hands-on supervision. In Martorell, S., Guedes Soares, C. and Barnett, J., Safety, Reliability and Risk Analysis: Theory, Methods and Applications. London: Taylor & Francis.
81. Larsen, L.D, Petersen, K., Hale, A.R., Heijer, H., Parker, D. and Lawrie, D. 2004. A Framework for Safety Rule Management. Contract number: GMA2/2001/52053. Lyngby: Danish Traffic Institute.
82. Laurence, D. 2005. Safety rules and regulations on mine sites: The problem and a solution. Journal of Safety Research, 36(1), 39-50.
83. Lawton, R. 1998. Not working to rule: Understanding procedural violations at work. Safety Science, 28(2) 77-96.
84. Leplat, J. 1998. About implementation of safety rules. Safety Science, 16(1), 189-204.
85. Levinthal, D. and Rerup, C. 2006. Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organization Science, 17(4), 502-13.
86. Loukopoulou, L. 2008. Pilot error: Even skilled experts make mistakes. Paper presented at WorkingonSafety.Net, 4th Annual Conference: Prevention of occupational accident in a changing work environment, Crete, Greece, 30 September - 3 October.
87. Maidment, D. 1993. A changing safety culture on British Rail. Paper to the 11th NeTWork Workshop on 'The use of rules to achieve safety'. Bad Homburg, 6-8 May.
88. Maidment, D. 1998. From a unidimensional to a bidimensional concept and measurement of workers' safety behaviour. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 24(4), 293-9.
89. Martin, L. 2001. Bending the rules or fudging the paperwork? Documenting learning in SMEs. Journal of Workplace Learning, 13(5), 189-97.
90. Mascini, P. 2005. The blameworthiness of health and safety rule violations. Law & Policy, 27(3), 472-90.
91. Mascini P. and Bacharias Y. 2008. Formal and informal risk handling strategies: The importance of ethnographic research for safety surveys. Proceedings of the 4th International Working on Safety Network conference, Crete.
92. McAfee, R.B. and Win, A.R. 1989. The use of incentives/feedback to enhance workplace safety: A critique of the literature. Journal of Safety Research, 20, 7-19.
93. McCarthy, J., Wright, P., Monk, A. and Watts, L. 1998. Concerns at work: Designing useful procedures. Human-computer Interaction, 13(4), 433-57.
94. McDonald, N., Corrigan, S., Daly, C. and Cromie, S. 2000. Safety management systems and safety culture in aircraft maintenance organisations. Safety Science, 34(1-3), 151-76.
95. McDonald, R., Waring, J., Harrison, S., Walshe, K. and Boaden, R. 2005. Rules and guidelines in clinical practice: A qualitative study in operating theatres of doctors' and nurses' views. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 14, 290-94.
96. McDonald, R., Waring, J. and Harrison, S. 2006. Rules, safety and the narrativisation of identity: A hospital operating theatre case study. Sociology of Health & Illness, 28(2), 178-202.
97. Mohamed, S. 2002. Safety climate in construction site environments. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(5), 375-84.
98. Mohamed, S. 2003. Scorecard approach to benchmarking organizational safety culture in construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(1), 80-88.
99. Nathanael, D. and Marmaras, N. 2006. The interplay between work practices and prescription: a key issue for organizational resilience. Paper presented at the 2nd Symposium on Resilience Engineering, Juan les Pins, France, 8-10 November.
100. Nathanael, D. and Marmaras, N. 2008. On the development of work practices: A constructivist model. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 9(5), 359-82.
101. Ng, I. and Dastmalchian, A. 1998. Organizational flexibility in Canada: A study of control and safeguard rules. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(3), 445-56.
102. Norros, L. 1993 Procedural factors in individual and organisational performance. Paper to the 11th NeTWork Workshop on 'The use of rules to achieve safety'. Bad Homburg, 6-8 May. VTT Espoo, Finland.
103. O'Dea, A. and Flin, R. 2001. Site managers and safety leadership in the offshore oil and gas industry. Safety Science, 37(1), 39-57.
104. O'Toole, M. 2001. The relationship between employees' perceptions of safety and organizational culture. Journal of Safety Research, 33(2), 231-43.
105. Otsuka, Y., Misawa, R., Noguchi, H. and Yamaguchi, H. 2010. A consideration for using workers' heuristics to improve safety rules based on relationships between creative mental sets and rule-violating actions. Safety Science, 48(7), 878-84.
106. Parker, D. and Lawton, R. 2000. Judging the use of clinical protocols by fellow professionals. Social Science & Medicine, 51(5), 669-77.
107. Parker, D. and Malone, C. 2004. Influencing Driver Attitudes and Behaviour. SPE International Conference on Health, Safety, and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production, 29-31 March.
108. Parker, D., Lawrie, M. and Hudson, P. 2006. A framework for understanding the development of organisational safety culture. Safety Science, 44(6), 551-62.
109. Parker, D., Reason, J.T., Manstead, A.S.R. and Stradling, S.G. 1995. Driving errors, driving violations and accident involvement. Ergonomics, 38(5), 1036-48.
110. Perrin, C. 1993. The dynamics of safety: The intersection of technical, cultural and social regulative systems in the operation of high hazard technologies. Paper to the 11th NeTWork Workshop on 'The use of rules to achieve safety'. Bad Homburg 6-8 May. MIT, Sloan School of Management.
111. Peters, R. 1999. The challenge of enforcing safety rules in remote hazardous work areas. Paper presented at Work, Stress, and Health '99: Organization of Work in a Global Economy Conference, Baltimore, 13 March.
112. Pidgeon, N. 1991. Safety culture and risk management in organizations. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 22(1), 129-40.
113. Polet, P., Vanderhaegen, F. and Wieringa, P. 2002. Theory of safety-related violations of system barriers. Cognition, Technology & Work, 4, 171-9.
114. Polet, P., Vanderhaegen, F. and Amalberti, R. 2003. Modelling borderline tolerated conditions of use (BTCU) and associated risks. Safety Science, 41(2-3), 111-36.
115. Power, M. 1997. The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
116. Prussia, G.E., Brown, K.A. and Willis, P. 2003. Mental models of safety: Do managers and employees see eye to eye? Journal of Safety Research, 34, 143-56.
117. Ranney, J. and Nelson, C. 2004. Impacts of participatory safety rules revision in U.S. railroad industry. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1899, 156-63.
118. Rasmussen, J. 1997. Risk management in a dynamic society: A modelling problem. Safety Science, 27(2/3), 183-213.
119. Rayner, S. 1986. Management of Radiation Hazards in Hospitals: Plural Rationalities in a Single Institution. Social Studies of Science, 16, 573-91.
120. Reason, J.T. 1990. Human Error. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
121. Reason, J.T. 1997. Managing the Risks of Organisational Accidents. Aldershot: Ashgate.
122. Reason, J., Parker, D. and Lawton, R. 1998. Organizational controls and safety: The varieties of rule-related behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 71, 289-304.
123. Reynaud, B. 1996. Types of rules, interpretation and collective dynamics: Reflections on the introduction of a salary rule in a maintenance workshop. Industrial and Corporate Change, 5(3), 699-721.
124. Reynaud, B. 2005. Void at the heart of rules: Routines in the context of rule following. The case of the Paris Metro Workshop. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(5), 847-71.
125. Schelling, T. 1985. Enforcing rules on oneself. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 1(2), 357-74.
126. Schöbel, M. 2009. Trust in high-reliability organizations. Social Science Information, 48(2), 315-33.
127. Schulz, M. 2003. Impermanent institutionalization: The duration dependence of organizational rule changes. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(5), 1077-1098.
128. Shaw, A, Blewett, V., Stiller, L., Cox, S., Ferguson, S., Frick, K. and Aickin, C. 2007. Digging Deeper. Report by Shaw Idea commissioned by NSW Mine Safety Advisory Council.
129. Simard, M. and Marchand, A. 1997. Workgroup's propensity to comply with safety rules: The influence of micro-macro organisational factors. Ergonomics, 40(2), 172-88.
130. Snook, S.A. 2002. Friendly Fire: The Accidental Shootdown of U.S. Black Hawks over Northern Iraq. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
131. Sundström-Frisk, C. 1998. Understanding human behaviour: A necessity in improving safety and health performance. Journal of Occupational Health and Safety - Australia and New Zealand, 15(1), 37-45.
132. Taylor, F.W. 1911. The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Harper and Brothers.
133. Thackaberry, J. 2004. 'Discursive opening' and closing in organizational self-study: Culture as trap and tool in wildland firefighting safety. Management Communication Quarterly, 17(3), 319-59.
134. Theodoulides, A. 2003. 'I would never personally tell anyone to break the rules, but you can bend them': Teaching moral values through team games. European Journal of Physical Education, 8(2), 141-59.
135. Van der Top, J. 2010. Modelling risk control measures in railways: Analysing how designers and operators organise safe rail traffic. PhD dissertation. Delft University of Technology, Safety Science Group.
136. Törner, M. and Pousette, A. 2009. Safety in construction: A comprehensive description of the characteristics of high safety standards in construction work, from the combined perspective of supervisors and experienced workers. Journal of Safety Research, 40, 399-409.
137. Vaughan, D. 1996. The Challenger Launch Decision: Risk Technology, Culture and Deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
138. Weick, K.E. 1993. The collapse of sense-making in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 628-52.
139. Weick, K.E. 1996. Drop your tools: An allegory for organizational studies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 301-13.
140. Wilson, N.A. 2004. Improving compliance with permanent attachment safety procedures in the overhead transmission industry: Reducing the potential for violations. MSc thesis in Risk Management & Safety Technology, University of Aston in Birmingham.
141. Woods, D.D. and Shattuck, L.G. 2000. Distant supervision: Local action given the potential for surprise. Cognition, Technology & Work, 2, 242-5.
142. Wright, P., Pocock, S. and Fields, R.E. 1998. The prescription and practice of work on the flight deck. In Green, T.R.G., Bannon, L., Warren, C.P. and Buckley, J. (eds.), Cognition and Cooperation: Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics (ECCE9). EACE Press, 37-42.
143. Zeitlin, L.R. 1994. Failure to follow safety instructions: Faulty communication or risky decision? Human Factors, 36(1), 172-81.
144. Zoller, H. 2003. Health on the line: Identity and disciplinary control in employee occupational health and safety discourse. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 31(2), 118-39.