Deciding whether to participate in a biobank: The concerns of healthy volunteers

Principles and Practice in Biobank Governance

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 117-133

  Cadigan, R Jean ^a   Davis, Arlene M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900117278     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Anderlik, M.R. and Rothstein, M.A. 2001. Privacy and confidentiality of genetic information: What rules for the new science? Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 2, 401-33.
2. Barr, M. 2006. 'I'm not really read up on genetics': Biobanks and the social context of informed consent. BioSocieties, 1(2), 251-62.
3. Bates, B.R., Lynch, J.A., Bevan, J.L. and Condit, C.M. 2005. Warranted concerns, warranted outlooks: A focus group study of public understandings of genetic research. Social Science & Medicine, 60(2), 331-44.
4. Beskow, L.M., Dame, L. and Costello, E.J. 2008. Research ethics: Certificates of Confidentiality and compelled disclosure of data. Science, 322(5904), 1054-55.
5. Bigorra, J. and Baños, J.E. 1990. Weight of financial reward in the decision by medical students and experienced healthy volunteers to participate in clinical trials. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 38(5), 443-46.
6. Boulton, M. and Parker, M. 2007. Informed consent in a changing environment. Social Science and Medicine, 65(11), 2187-198.
7. Busby, H. 2004. Blood donation for genetic research: What can we learn from donors' narratives? in Genetic Databases: Socio-ethical Issues in the Collection and Use of DNA, edited by R. Tutton and O. Corrigan. London: Routledge, 39-56.
8. Catania, J.A., Wolf, L.E., Wertleib, S., Lo, B. and Henne, J. 2007. Research participants' perceptions of the Certificate of Confidentiality's assurances and limitations. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2(4), 53-9.
9. Caulfield, T. 2007. Biobanks and blanket consent: The proper place of the public good and public perception rationales. King's Law Journal, 18(2), 209-26.
10. Chulada, P.C., Vahdat, H.L., Sharp, R.R., DeLozier, T.C., Watkins, P.B., Pusek, S.N. and Blackshear, P.J. 2008. The Environmental Polymorphisms Registry: A DNA resource to study genetic susceptibility loci. Human Genetics, 123(2), 207-14.
11. Churchill, L.R., Nelson, D.K., Henderson, G.E., King, N.M.P., Davis, A.M., Leahey, E. and Wilfond, B.S. 2003. Assessing benefits in clinical research: Why diversity in benefit assessment can be risky. IRB: Ethics and Human Research, 25(3), 1-8.
12. Coleman, C.H., Menikoff, J.A., Goldner, J.A. and Dubler, N.N. 2005. The Ethics and Regulation of Research with Human Subjects. Newark, NJ: LexisNexis.
13. Corrigan, O. 2003. Empty ethics: The problem with informed consent. Sociology of Health & Illness, 25(7), 768-92.
14. Cunny, K.A. and Miller, H.W. 1994. Participation in clinical drug studies: Motivations and barriers. Clinical Therapeutics, 16(2), 273-82.
15. Deschênes, M., Cardinal, G., Knoppers, B.M. and Glass, K.C. 2001. Human genetic research, DNA banking and consent: A question of 'form'? Clinical Genetics, 59(4), 221-39.
16. Dickert, N. and Grady, C. 1999. What's the price of a research subject? Approaches to payment for research participation. New England Journal of Medicine, 341(3), 198-203.
17. Dixon-Woods, M., Ashcroft, R.E., Jackson, C.J., Tobin, M.D., Kivits, J., Burton, P.R. and Samani, N.J. 2007. Beyond 'misunderstanding': Written information and decisions about taking part in a genetic epidemiology study. Social Science & Medicine, 65(11), 2212-222.
18. Fortun, P., West, J., Chalkley, L., Shonde, A. and Hawkey, C. 2008. Recall of informed consent information by healthy volunteers in clinical trials. QJM, 101(8), 625-29.
19. Gottweis, H. 2002. Gene therapy and the public: A matter of trust. Gene Therapy, 9(11), 667-69.
20. Grady, C. 2001. Money for research participation: Does it jeopardize informed consent? American Journal of Bioethics, 1(2), 40-4.
21. Grady, C. 2005. Payment of clinical research subjects. The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 115(7), 1681-87.
22. Grady, C. 2004. Levels and styles of participation in genetic databases: A case study of the North Cumbria Community Genetics Project, in Genetic Databases: Socio-ethical Issues in the Collection and Use of DNA, edited by R. Tutton and O. Corrigan. London: Routledge, 57-77.
23. Halpern, S.D., Karlawish, J.H.T., Casarett, D., Berlin, J.A. and Asch, D.A. 2004. Empirical assessment of whether moderate payments are undue or unjust inducements for participation in clinical trials. Archives of Internal Medicine, 164(7), 801-803.
24. Hansson, M.G., Dillner, J., Bartram, C.R., Carlson, J.A. and Helgesson, G. 2006. Should donors be allowed to give broad consent to future biobank research? Lancet Oncology, 7(3), 266-69.
25. Hoeyer, K. 2003. 'Science is really needed - that's all I know': Informed consent and the non-verbal practices of collecting blood for genetic research in northern Sweden. New Genetics and Society, 22(3), 229-44.
26. Hoeyer, K. 2004. Ambiguous gifts: Public anxiety, informed consent and biobanks, in Genetic Databases: Socio-ethical Issues in the Collection and Use of DNA, edited by R. Tutton and O. Corrigan. London: Routledge, 97-116.
27. Hoeyer, K. and Lynöe, N. 2006. Motivating donors to genetic research? Anthropological reasons to rethink the role of informed consent. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 9(3), 13-23.
28. McCarty, C.A., Nair, A., Austin, D.M. and Giampietro, P.F. 2007. Informed consent and subject motivation to participate in a large, population-based genomics study: The Marshfield Clinic Personalized Medicine Research Project. Community Genetics, 10(1), 2-9.
29. Miller, T. and Boulton, M. 2007. Changing constructions of informed consent: Qualitative research and complex social worlds. Social Science & Medicine, 65(11), 2199-211.
30. O'Neill, O. 2003. Some limits of informed consent. Journal of Medical Ethics, 29(1), 4-7.
31. Resnick, D.B. 2008. Increasing the amount of payment to research subjects. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34(9), e14.
32. Sears, J.M. 2001. The payment of research subjects: Ethical concerns. Oncology Nurses Forum, 28(4), 657-63.
33. Tambor, E.S., Bernhardt, B.A., Rodgers, J., Holtzman, N.A. and Geller, G. 2002. Mapping the human genome: An assessment of media coverage and public reaction. Genetics in Medicine, 4(1), 31-6.
34. Tishler, C.L. and Bartholomae, S. 2002. The recruitment of normal healthy volunteers: A review of the literature on the use of financial incentives. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 42(4), 365-75.
35. United States Department of Health and Human Services. 2003. Certificates of Confidentiality: Background Information. [Online] Available at: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/coc/background.htm [accessed 14 October 2008].
36. United States Department of Health and Human Services. 2005. Protection of Human Subjects. US Code of Federal Regulations, title 45, part 46. [Online] Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm#46.116 [accessed 13 October 2008].
37. United States Department of Health and Human Services. 2008. Office of Civil Rights - HIPAA. [Online] Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/hipaa/ [accessed 30 September 2008].
38. United States Food and Drug Administration. 1998. Payment to Research Subjects. [Online] Available at: http://www.fda.gov/oc/ohrt/irbs/toc4.html#payment [accessed 16 October 2008].
39. United States National Cancer Institute. 2007. National Cancer Institute Best Practices for Biospecimen Resources. Bethesda, MD: NCI, NIH. [Online] Available at: http://biospecimens.cancer.gov/global/pdfs/NCI_Best_Practices_060507.pdf [accessed 27 February 2009].
40. United States National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences - National Institutes of Health. 2006. The Environmental Polymorphisms Registry. [Online] Available at: http://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/databases/epr/ [accessed 30 September 2008].
41. United States Office of Human Subjects Research. 2000. Information Sheet 20. [Online] Available at: http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/info/sheet20.html [accessed 16 October 2008].
42. van Gelderen, C.E.M., Savelkoul, T.J.F., van Dokkum, W. and Meulenbelt, J. 1993. Motives and perception of healthy volunteers who participate in experiments. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 45(1), 15-19.
43. Wendler, D. 2006. One-time consent for research on biological samples. British Medical Journal, 332(7240), 544-47.
44. Wendler, D. 2003. Why say no? Reasons for non-participation in the North Cumbria Community Genetics Project. European Journal of Human Genetics, 11(Supp. 1), 33-9.