Universalism and indigenization in the history of modern psychology

Internationalizing the History of Psychology

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 208-225

  Danziger, Kurt ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900098309     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (36)

1. Allwood, C.M. and Berry, J.W. (in press). Origins and development of indigenous psychologies: An international analysis. International Journal of Psychology.
2. Bhatia, S. (2002). Orientalism in Euro-American and Indian psychology: Historical representations of " natives" in colonial and postcolonial contexts. History of Psychology, 5, 376-398.
3. Boring, E. G. (1950). A history of experimental psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
4. Bü hler, K. et al. (1930). Kundgebung der deutschen Gesellschaft fü r Psychologie [Proceedings of the German Society of Psychology]. In H. Volkelt (Ed.), Bericht ü ber der XI. Kongress fü r experimentelle Psychologie in Wien 1929 [Report on the 22th Congress of Experimental Psychology in Vienna 1929] (pp. vii-x). Jena: Fischer.
5. Cattell, J. McK. (1904). The conceptions and methods of psychology. Popular Science Monthly, 66, 176-186.
6. Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Danziger, K. (1991). Introduction: Special issue on new developments in the history of psychology. History of the Human Sciences, 4, 327-333.
8. Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. London: Sage.
9. Easton, D. (1991). The division, integration and transfer of knowledge. In D. Easton and C. S. Schelling (Eds.), Divided knowledge: Across disciplines, across cultures (pp. 7-36). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10. Enriquez, V. G. (1987). Decolonizing the Filipino psyche: Impetus for the development of psychology in the Philippines. In G. H. Blowers and A. Turtle (Eds.), Psychology moving East (pp. 365-287). Boulder, CO: Westview.
11. Enriquez, V. G. (1993). Developing a Filipino psychology. In U. Kim and J. W. Berry (Eds.), Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context (pp. 152-169). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12. Geuter, U. (1992). The professionalization of psychology in Nazi Germany. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Hermans, J. M., and Kempen, H. J. G. (1998). Moving cultures: The perilous problems of cultural dichotomies in a globalizing society. American Psychologist, 53, 1111-1120.
14. Ho, D. Y. F. (1988). Asian psychology: A dialogue on indigenization and beyond. In A. C. Paranjpe, D. Y. F. Ho and R. W. Rieber (Eds.), Asian contributions to psychology (pp. 53-77). New York: Praeger.
15. James.W. (1904). Does consciousness exist? Journal of Philosophy, 1, 497-491.
16. Kim, U., and Berry, J.W. (1993). Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context. Newbury Park: Sage.
17. Kuper, A. (1999). Culture: The anthropologists' account. Cambridge,Mass.: Harvard University Press.
18. Meyer, M. F. (1921). Psychology of the other-one: An introductory text-book of psychology. Columbia,Mo.: Missouri Book Co.
19. Misra, G. (1996). Toward indigenous Indian psychology. American Psychologist, 51, 497-499.
20. Moghaddam, F.M. (1987). Psychology in the Three Worlds: As reflected by the crisis in social psychology and the move toward indigenous third-world psychology. American Psychologist, 42, 912-920.
21. Moscovici, S. (1972). Society and theory in social psychology. In J. Israel and H. Tajfel (Eds.), The context of social psychology: A critical assessment (pp. 17-68). London: Academic Press.
22. Nsamenang, A. B. (1992). Human development in cultural context: A third world perspective. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23. Nsamenang, A. B. (1995). Factors influencing the development of psychology in sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Psychology, 30, 729-739.
24. O'Donnell, J. M. (1979). The crisis of experimentation in the 1920's: E. G. Boring and his uses of history. American Psychologist, 34, 289-295.
25. Oommen, T. K. (1991). Internationalization of sociology: A view from developing countries. Current Sociology, 39, 67-84.
26. Rieber, R.W. (2001). Wundt and the Americans: From flirtation to abandonment. In R.W. Rieber and D. K. Robinson (Eds.), Wilhelm Wundt in history (pp. 145-160). New York: Kluwer Academic.
27. Shweder, R. A. (2000). The psychology of practice and the practice of the three psychologies. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 207-222.
28. Sinha, D. (1997). Indigenizing psychology. In J.W. Berry, H. Poortinga, and J. Panday (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, vol. 1 (pp. 129-170). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
29. Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.
30. Smith, R. (1988). Does the history of psychology have a subject? History of the Human Sciences, 1, 147-177.
31. Sokal, M. M. (1981). An education in psychology: James McKeen Cattell's letters from Germany and England, 1880-1888. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Staeuble, I. (2004). De-centering Western perspectives: Psychology and the disciplinary order in the first and third world. In A. C. Brock, J. Louw, and W. van Hoorn (Eds.), Rediscovering the history of psychology: Essays inspired by the work of Kurt Danziger (pp. 183-205). New York: Kluwer.
33. Stompka, P. (1990). Conceptual frameworks in comparative inquiry: Divergent or convergent? In M. Albrow and E. King (Eds.), Globalization, knowledge and society (pp. 47-58). London: Sage.
34. Tinker, M. A. (1980).Wundt's doctorate students and their theses. In W. G. Bringmann and R. D. Tweney (Eds.),Wundt studies (pp. 269-279). Toronto: Hogrefe.
35. Wundt,W. (1909). Ü ber reine und angewandte Psychologie [On pure and applied psychology]. Psychologische Studien, 5, 1-47.
36. Yang, K-S. (1997). Indigenizing Westernized Chinese psychology. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), Working at the interface of cultures: Eighteen lives in social science (pp. 62-76). London: Routledge.