A case study of infusing web 2.0 tools for blended learning: Virtual presentations as an alternative means of assessment

Comparative Blended Learning Practices and Environments

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 170-187

  Lai, Yiu Chi ^a   Ng, Eugenia M W ^a  

^a THE EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900064241     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-852-9.ch009     Document Type: Chapter

References (27)

1. Barlow, T. (2008). Web 2.0: Creating a classroom without walls. Teaching Science, 54(1), 46-48.
2. Berry, R. (2008). Assessment for learning. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
3. Biggs, J. (1996). Assessing learning quality: Reconciling institutional, staff, and educational demands. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 21, 5-15. doi:10.1080/0260293960210101
4. Boud, D., & Walker, D. (1998). Promoting reflection in professional courses: The challenge of context. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 191-206. doi:10.1080/03075079812331380384
5. Brown, S., & Knight, P. (1994). Assessing learning in higher education. London: Kogan Page.
6. Bruner, J. S. (1986). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Buchanan, T. (2000). The efficacy of a World Wide Web mediated formative assessment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, 193-200. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2729.2000.00132.x
8. Chan, C. K. K., & Van Aalst, J. (2004). Learning, assessment, and collaboration in computer-supported environments. In J. W. Strijbos, P. A. Kirschner, R. L. & Martens (Eds.), What we know about CSCL and implementing it in higher education (pp. 87-112). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
9. Chang, C. C. (2001). Construction and evaluation of a Web-based learning portfolio system: An electronic assessment tool. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 38(2), 144-155. doi:10.1080/13558000010030194
10. Conrad, D. (2008). Reflecting on strategies for a new learning culture: Can we do it! Journal of Distance Education, 22(3), 157-161.
11. Johnson, D. (1994). Research methods in educational management. Harlow: Longman.
12. Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC). (2007). Effective practice with e-Assessment: An overview of technologies, policies, and practice in further and higher education. Retrieved on March 10, 2009, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/docu-ments/themes/elearning/effpraceassess.pdf
13. Jonassen, D. H., Howland, J., Moore, J. C., & Marra, R. M. (2003). Learning to solve problems with technology: A constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
14. Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. L., & Wilson, B. G. (1999). Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
15. Kwok, R., & Ma, J. (1999). Use of a group support system for collaborative assessment. Computers & Education, 32, 109-125. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(98)00059-1
16. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17. Lin, S. S. J., Liu, E. Z. F., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Web-based peer assessment: Feedback for students with various thinking styles. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 420-432. doi:10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00198.x
18. Macdonald, J., Weller, M., & Mason, R. (2002). Meeting the assessment demands of networked courses. International Journal on E-Learning, 1(1), 9-18.
19. nd ed.). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
20. Mortera-Gutiérrez, F. (2006). Faculty best practices using blended learning in e-learning and face-to-face instruction. International Journal on E-Learning, 5(3), 313-337.
21. Oliver, K. (2007). Leveraging Web 2.0 in the re-design of a graduate-level technology integration course. TechTrends, 51(5), 55-61. doi:10.1007/ s11528-007-0071-3
22. Ridgway, J., McCusker, S., & Pead, D. (2004). Literature review of e-assessment. Bristol, UK: Futurelab. Retrieved on March 10, 2009, from http://www.futurelab.org.uk/resources/docu-ments/lit_reviews/Assessment_Review.pdf
23. Robson, C. (1993). Real world research. Oxford: Blackwell.
24. Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Brand-Gruwel, & Van Merrienboer, J. (2002). Peer assessment training in teacher education: Effects on performance and perceptions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5), 443-454. doi:10.1080/0260293022000009311
25. Thelwall, M. (2000). Computer-based assessment: A versatile educational tool. Computers & Education, 34, 37-49. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00037-8
26. Vaughan, N. (2007). Perspectives on blended learning in higher education. International Journal on E-Learning, 6(1), 81-94.
27. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.