When Is Research Good Evidence? Issues in Reading Research

Clinical Social Work Journal

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 107-115

  Anastas, Jeane W ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical thinking; Evidence supported treatments; Reading research; Scientific thinking; Social work practice

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899987490     PISSN: 00911674     EISSN: 15733343     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10615-013-0452-3     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Anastas, J. W., & MacDonald, M. L. (1994). Research design in social work and the human services. New York, NY: Lexington Books.
2. Anastas, J. W. (2004). Quality in qualitative evaluation: Issues and possible answers. Research on Social Work Practice, 14(1), 57-65.
3. Anastas, J. W. (2012a). Ethics in research--revision. In T. MIzrahi & L. E. Davis (Eds.), Encyclopedia of social work, (20th ed.). New York: NASW Press and Oxford University Press.
4. Anastas, J. W. (2012b). From scientism to science: How contemporary epistemology can inform practice research. Clinical Social Work Journal, 40(2), 157-165.
5. Bhaskar, R. (2008). A realist theory of social science. London: Verso.
6. Cahill, S. P., Carrigan, M. H., & Frueh, B. C. (1999). Does EMDR work? And, if so, why?: A critical review of controlled outcome and dismantling research. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 13(1-2), 5-33.
7. Cope, M. B., & Allison, D. B. (2010). White hat bias: A threat to the integrity of scientific reporting. Acta Paeditrica, 99, 1615-1617.
8. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
9. Dawes, R. M. (1994). House of cards: Psychology and psychotherapy built on myth. New York: The Free Press.
10. Drisko, J. W. (1997). Strengthening qualitative studies and report: Standards to promote academic integrity. Journal of Social Work Education, 33(1), 185-197.
11. Drisko, J. W., & Grady, M. D. (2012). Evidence-based practice in clinical social work. New York: Springer.
12. Epstein, I. (2011). Clinical data-mining: Integrating practice and research. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Gambrill, E. (2012). Propaganda in the helping professions. New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Gibelman, M., & Gelman, S. (2001). Learning from the mistakes of others: A look at scientific misconduct in research. Journal of Social Work Education, 37(2), 241-254.
15. Goldenberg, M. J. (2006). On evidence and evidence-based medicine: Lessons from the philosophy of science. Social Science and Medicine, 62, 2621-2632.
16. Goldenberg, M. J. (2009). Iconoclast or creed? Objectivism, pragmatism, and the hierarchy of evidence. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 52(2), 168-187.
17. Grady, M. D., Rozas, L. M., & Bledsoe, S. E. (2010). Are curriculum decisions based on the evidence? How social work faculty members make choices in curriculum decisions. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 7, 466-480.
18. Kazdin, A. E. (2008). Evidence-based treatment and practice: New opportunities to bridge clinical research and practice, enhance the knowledge base, and improve patient care. America Psychologist, 63(3), 146-159.
19. Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
20. Littell, J. H. (2005). Lessons from a systematic review of effects of multisystemic therapy. Children and Youth Services Review, 27, 445-463.
21. Littell, J. H., Corcoran, J., & Pillai, V. (2008). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
22. Littell, J. H., Popa, M., & Forsythe, B. (2005). Multisystemic Therapy for social, emotional, and behavior problems in youth age 10-17. Cochrane Library, Issue 3. Chichester: Wiley.
23. Longhofer, J., & Floersch, J. (2012). The coming crisis in social work: Some thoughts on social work and science. Research on Social Work Practice, 22(5), 499-519.
24. Lushin, V., & Anastas, J. W. (2011). Harm reduction in substance abuse treatment: Pragmatism as an epistemology for social work practice. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 11(1), 96-100.
25. Manicas, P. T., & Secord, P. F. (1983). Implications for psychology of the new philosophy of science. American Psychologist, 38, 399-413.
26. Maxfield, L. (2007). Current status and future directions for EMDR research. Journal of EMDR Practice and Research, 1(1), 6-14.
27. Myers, L. L., & Thyer, B. A. (1997). Should social work clients have the right to effective treatment? Social Work, 42, 288-298.
28. National Association of Social Work. (2008). Code of ethics. Washington, DC: NASW Press.
29. Nichols-Casebolt, A. (2012). Responsible integrity and the responsible conduct of research. New York: Oxford University Press.
30. PLos Medicine. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for parallel groups randomized trials. Retrieved February 5, 2013, at http://www. plosmedicine. org/article/info: doi: 10. 1371/journal. premed. 1000251.
31. Sayer, A. (2000). Realism and social science. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
32. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professional think in action. New York: Basic Books.
33. Steneck, N. H. (2007). ORI introduction to the responsible conduct of research (rev ed.). Washington, DC: Office of Research Integrity, Public Health Service, HHS.
34. Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Tavris, C., & Aronson, E. (2007). Mistakes were made (but not by me): Why we justify foolish beliefs, bad decisions, and hurtful acts. New York: Harcourt.
36. Thyer, B. A., & Pignotti, M. (2011). Evidence-based practices do not exist. Clinical Social Work Journal, 39, 328-333.
37. Weissman, M. M., Verdeli, H., Gameroff, M. J., Bledsoe, S. E., Betts, K., Mufson, L., et al. (2006). National survey of psychotherapy training in psychiatry, psychology, and social work. Archives of General Psychiatry, 63, 925-934.
38. Witkin, S. (1998). The right to effective treatment and effective treatment rights: Rhetorical empiricism and the politics of research. Social Work, 43(1), 75-80.
39. Witkin, S., & Harrison, W. D. (2001). Whose evidence and for what purpose? [Editorial]. Social Work, 46(4), 293-296.