Prototype theory: An alternative concept theory for categorizing sex and gender?

Knowledge Organization

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 328-334

  Fox, Melodie J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899980448     PISSN: 09437444     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5771/0943-7444-2011-4-328     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Alcoff, Linda. M. 2005. The metaphysics of gender and sexual difference. In B.S. Andrew, J. Keller, and L.H. Schwartzman, eds., Feminist interventions in ethics and politics: Feminist ethics and social theory. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp.17-39.
2. Blackless, Melanie, Charuvastra, Anthony, Derryck, Amanda, Fausto-Sterling, Anne, Lauzanne, Karl, and Ellen Lee. 2000. How sexually dimorphic are we? Review and synthesis. American journal of human biology 12: 151-66.
3. Dahlberg, Ingetraut. 1995. Conceptual structures and systemization. International forum on information and documentation 20(3): 9-24.
4. Frye, Marilyn. 2005. Categories in distress. In Feminist interventions in ethics and politics: Feminist ethics and social theory, B.S. Andrew, J. Keller, and L.H. Schwartzman, eds. Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 41-58.
5. Hale, Jacob. 1996. Are lesbians women? Hypatia 11(2): 94-121.
6. Haslanger, Sally. 2000. Gender and race: (What) are they? (What) do we want them to be? NOÛS 34(1): 31-55.
7. Hjørland, Birger. 2009. Concept theory. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60: 1519-36.
8. Jacob, Elin. K. 2004. Classification and categorization: A difference that makes a difference. Library trends 52(3): 515-40.
9. Margolis, Eric, and Laurence, Stephen. 2006. Concepts. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/concepts.
10. Nye, Andrea. 1990. Words of power: A feminist reading of the history of logic. New York: Routledge.
11. Olson, Hope A. 1999. Exclusivity, teleology and hierarchy: Our Aristotelian legacy. Knowledge organization 26: 65-73.
12. Olson, Hope A. 2001. Sameness and difference: A cultural foundation of classification. Library resources & technical services 45: 115-22.
13. Olson, Hope A. 2007. How we construct subjects: A feminist analysis. Library trends 56(2): 509-41.
14. Rosch, Eleanor. 1999. Reclaiming cognition: The primacy of action, intention and emotion. The journal of consciousness studies 6(11-12): 61-77.
15. Slaughter, Mary M. 1982. Universal languages and scientific taxonomy in the seventeenth century. New York: Cambridge UP.
16. Szostak, Rick. 2004. Classifying science: phenomena, data, theory, method, practice. Norwell, MA: Springer.
17. Szostak, Rick. 2010. Comment on Hjørland’s concept theory. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61: 1076-77.
18. Wittgenstein, L. [1988] 1953. Philosophical investigations, 3rd ed. Trans. G.E.M Anscombe. London: Basil Blackwell.