How we construct subjects: A feminist analysis

Library Trends

Volumn 56, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 509-541

  Olson, Hope A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38849164285     PISSN: 00242594     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Aitchison, J., & Clarke, S. D. (2004). The thesaurus: A historical viewpoint, with a look to the future. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 37(3/4), 5-21.
2. Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (2nd ed.). (2002). Ottawa: Canadian Library Association.
3. ANSI/NISO Z39.19. (2005). ANSI/NISO 139.19-2005 Guidelines for the Construdion, Format, and Management of Monolingual Controlled Vocabularies. Bethesda, MD: NISO Press. Retrieved June 24, 2007, from http://www.niso.org/ standards/index.html.
4. Aristotle, (1938). Prior Analytics (H. Tredennick, Trans.). In The Organon (pp.182-531). London: W. Heinemann.
5. Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.
6. Blackburn, S. (1994), The Oxford dictionary of philosophy. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
7. Boere, M. (Ed.). (1998). European women's thesaurus: A structured list of descriptors for indexing and retrieving information in the field of the position of women and women's studies (J. Vaughan, Trans.). Amsterdam: International Information Centre and Archives for the Women's Movement.
8. British Standards Institution. (1979). Guidelines for the establishment and development of monolingual thesauri. London: The Institution.
9. Canadian Women's Indexing Group. (1990). The Canadian feminist thesaurus / Le thesaurus feministe du Canada. Toronto: OISE Press.
10. Capek, M. E. S. (Ed.). (1987). A women's thesaurus. New York: Harper & Row.
11. Clinchy, B. M. (1996). Connected and separate knowing: Toward a marriage of two minds. In N. R. Goldberger, J. M. Tarule, B. M. Clinchy, & M. F. Belenky (Eds.), Knowledge, difference, and power: Essays inspired by Women's Ways of Knowing (pp. 205-247). New York: Basic Books.
12. Code, L. (1991). What can she know? Feminist theory and the construction of knowledge. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
13. Cutter, C. A. (1876). Rules for a printed dictionary catalogue. In Public libraries in the United States of America: Their history, condition, and management - Part II. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
14. Dewey, M. (2003). Dewey decimal classification and relative index, 22 Ed. J. S. Mitchell, J. Beall, G. Martin, W. E. Matthews, & G. R. New Ed.). Dublin, OH: OCLC.
15. Fixico, D. L. (2003). The American Indian mind in a linear world. New York: Routledge.
16. Foskett, A. C. (1971). Misogynists all: A study in critical classification. Library Resources & Technical Services, 15, 117-121.
17. Fuss, D. (1989). Essentially speaking: Feminism, nature & difference. New York: Routledge.
18. Gerhard, K. H., Su, M. C., & Rubens, C. C. (1998). An empirical examination of subject headings for Women's Studies core materials. College & Research Libraries, 59, 130-138.
19. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Goldberger, N. R., Tarule, J. M., Clinchy, B. M., & Belenky, M. F. (Eds.). (1996). Knowledge, difference, and power: Essays inspired by "Women's Ways of Knowing. " New York: Basic Books.
21. Green, R. (1995). Syntagmatic relationships in index languages: A reassessment, Library Quarterly, 65, 365-385.
22. Grosz, E. (1994). Sexual difference and the problem of essentialism. In N. Schor & E. Weed (Eds.), The essential difference (pp. 82-97). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
23. Harding, S. (1996). Gendered ways of knowing and the " Epistemological Crisis" of the West. In N. R. Goldberger,J. M. Tarule, B. M. Clinchy, & M. F. Belenky (Eds.), Knowledge, difference, and power: Essays inspired by Women's Ways of Knowing (pp. 205-247). New York: Basic Books.
24. Hass, M. (1998). Feminist readings of Aristotelian logic. In C. A. Freeland (Ed.), Feminist interpretations of Aristotle (pp. 19-40). University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
25. Hekman, S.J. (1990). Gender and knowledge: elements of a postmodern feminism. Oxford: Polity.
26. Hildreth, C. R. ( 1995). Online catalog design models: Are we moving in the right direction? Retrieved June 24, 2007, from http://www.ou.edu/ faculty/H/Charles.R.Hildreth/clr-five.html.
27. Huston, M. M., & Williams, J. L. (1987) Researcher response to the politics of information. Research Strategies, 5, 90-93.
28. IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. (1998). Functional requirements for bibliographic records-Final report. Munchen: K. G. Saur. Retrieved June 22, 2007, from http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr.htm.
29. Intner, S. S., & Futas, E. (1996). The Role and impact of Library of Congress classification on the assessment of Women's Studies collections. Library Acquisitions: Practice & Theory, 20, 267-279.
30. Irigaray, L. (1985). The "Mechanics" of Fluids. In, C. Porter (Trans.), This sex which is not one (pp. 106-118). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
31. Jay, N. (1989). Gender and dichotomy. Feminist studies, 7, 38-56.
32. Kublik, A., Clevette, V., Ward, D. B., & Olson, H. A. (2003). Adapting dominant classifications to particular contexts. Cataloging of Classification Quarterly, 37(1/2), 13-31.
33. Larrabee, M.J. (Ed.). (1993). An ethic of care: Feminist and interdistiplinary perspectives. New York: Routledge.
34. Library of Congress. (1996). Library of Congress subject headings (19th ed.). Washington, DC: Library of Congress, Cataloging Distribution Service.
35. Library of Congress Cataloging Policy and Support Office. (1996). Subject cataloging manual: Subject headings (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Library of Congress, Cataloging Distribution Service.
36. Lloyd, G. (1991). Reason as attainment. In S. Gunew (Ed.), A reader in feminist knowledge (pp. 166-180). London: Routledge. (Reprinted from The man of reason: 'Male' and 'female' in western philosophy, by G. Lloyd, 1984, London: Methuen).
37. López-Huertas, M., de Torres, I., & Barité, M. (2004). Terminological representation of specialized areas in conceptual structures: The case of gender studies. In I. C. McIlwaine (Ed.), Knowledge Organization and the Global Information Society Proceedings of the Eighth International ISKO Conference, 13-16 July 2004, London, UK (pp. 35-39). Wurzburg, Germany: Ergon.
38. Lorigo, L, Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., Joachims, T., Granka, L., & Gay, G. (2006). The influence of task and gender on search and evaluation behavior using Google. Information Processing & Management, 42, 1123-1131.
39. Maron, M. E. (1977). On indexing, retrieval and the meaning of about. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 28, 38-43.
40. Maniez, J. (1988). Relationships in thesauri: Some critical remarks. International Classification, 15, 133-138.
41. Marshall, J. K. (1972). LC labeling: An indictment. In C. West and E. Katz (Eds.), Revolting Librarians (pp. 45-49). San Francisco: Booklegger Press.
42. Marshall, J. K. (1977). On equal terms: A thesaurus for nonsexist indexing and cataloging. New York: Neal-Schuman.
43. Nicholas, Y. (2005). Folklore requirements for bibliographic records: Oral traditions and FRBR. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 39, 179-195.
44. Nicholson, L. J. (1993). Women, morality, and history. In M.J. Larrabee (Ed.), An ethic of care: Feminist and interdisdplinary perspectives (pp. 87-101). New York: Routledge.
45. Nye, A (2002). Saying what it is: Predicate logic and natural kinds. In R. J. Falmagne & M. Hass (Eds.), Representing reason: Feminist theory and formal logic (pp. 191-208). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
46. Nye, A. (1990). Words of Power A feminist reading of the history of logic. New York: Routledge.
47. Oliver, P. (2002). "What do girls know anyway?": Rationality, gender, and social control. In R. J. Falmagne & M. Hass (Eds.), Representing reason: Feminist theory and formal logic (pp. 209-232). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
48. Olson, H. A. (1992). Subject access to women's studies materials. In B. H. Weinberg (Ed.), Cataloging Heresy: Challenging the Standard Bibliographic Product: Proceedings of the Congress for Librarians, Feb. 18, 1991, St. John's University, Jamaica, New York (pp. 159-169). Medford, NJ: Learned Information.
49. Olson, H. A. (1998). Mapping beyond Dewey's boundaries: Constructing classificatory space for marginalized knowledge domains. In G. C. Bowker & S. L. Star (Eds.), How Classifications Work: Problems and Challenges in an Electronic Age [Special issue]. Library Trends, 47(2), 233-254.
50. Olson, H. A. (1999). Exclusivity, teleology and hierarchy: Our Aristotelean legacy. Knowledge Organization, 26(2), 65-73.
51. Olson, H. A. (2001a). Patriarchal structures of subject access and subversive techniques for change. Canadian Journal for Information and Library Science, 26(2/3), 1-29.
52. Olson, H. A. (2001b). The power to name: Representation in library catalogues. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 26, 639-668.
53. Olson, H. A. (2001c). Sameness and difference: A cultural foundation of classification. Library Resources Uf Technical Services, 45,115-122.
54. Olson, H. A. (2002). The power to name: Locating the limits of subject representation in libraries. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
55. Plumwood, V. (1993). The politics of reason: towards a feminist logic. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 71, 436-462.
56. Rogers, M. N. (1993). Are we on equal terms yet? Subject headings in LCSH, 1975-1991. Library Resources &f Technical Services, 37,181-196.
57. Sayers, W. C. B. (1926). A manual of classification for librarians Uf bibliographers. London: Grafton.
58. Scheman, N. (1993). Engenderings: Constructions of knowledge, authority, and privilege. New York: Routledge.
59. Simpson, J. A., Sc Weiner, E. S. C. (n.d.). The Oxford English didionary (2nd ed.). Retrieved July 1, 2007, from OED Online.
60. Smith, L. T. (1999), Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.
61. Sparkes, A. W. (1991). Talking philosophy: A wordbook. London: Routledge.
62. Spelman, E. V. (1988). The inessential woman: Problems of exclusion in feminist thought Boston: Beacon Press.
63. Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge.
64. UNESCO. (2003). UNESCO thesaurus. Retrieved December 3, 2006, from http://www2.ulcc .ac.uk/unesco/.
65. Weinberg, B. H. (1993). The hidden classification in Library of Congress subject headings for Judaica. Library Resources & Technical Services, 37, 369-379.
66. Zoe, L. R., & DiMartino, D. (2000). Cultural diversity and end-user searching: An analysis by gender and language background. Research Strategies, 17, 291-305.