Effect of experimental analogs of contingency management treatment on cocaine seeking behavior

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Volumn 139, Issue , 2014, Pages 164-168

  Greenwald, Mark K ^a   Ledgerwood, David M ^a   Lundahl, Leslie H ^a   Steinmiller, Caren L ^a,b  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b MEDICAL COLLEGE OF OHIO   (United States)

Author keywords

Cocaine; Contingency management; Magnitude; Probability; Self administration

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCAINE DEPENDENCE; CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENT; DECISION MAKING; DRUG SEEKING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOTHERAPY; REINFORCEMENT; SELF ADMINISTRATION TEST; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; COCAINE-RELATED DISORDERS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REWARD;

BEHAVIOR THERAPY; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COCAINE-RELATED DISORDERS; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); REWARD;

EID: 84899958622     PISSN: 03768716     EISSN: 18790046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.03.009     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ainslie G., Monterosso J.R. Building blocks of self-control: increased tolerance for delay with bundled rewards. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 2003, 79:37-48.
2. Baum W.M. On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 1974, 22:231-242.
3. Donny E.C., Bigelow G.E., Walsh S.L. Choosing to take cocaine in the human laboratory: effects of cocaine dose, inter-choice interval, and magnitude of alternative reinforcement. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2003, 69:289-301.
4. Donny E.C., Bigelow G.E., Walsh S.L. Assessing the initiation of cocaine self-administration in humans during abstinence: effects of dose, alternative reinforcement, and priming. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 2004, 172:316-323.
5. First M.B., Spitzer R.L., Gibbon M., Williams J.B.W. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis Disorders - Patient Edition (SCID-I/P, Version 2.0) 1996, American Psychiatric Press, Washington, DC.
6. Graf V., Bullock D.H., Bitterman M.E. Further experiments on probability-matching in the pigeon. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 1964, 7:151-157.
7. Green L., Myerson J., Calvert A.L. Pigeons' discounting of probabilistic and delayed reinforcers. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 2010, 94:113-123.
8. Hernnstein R.J. Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 1961, 4:267-272.
9. Higgins S.T., Bickel W.K., Hughes J.R. Influence of an alternative reinforcer on human cocaine self-administration. Life Sci. 1994, 55:179-187.
10. Higgins S.T., Budney A.J., Bickel W.K., Foerg F.E., Donham R., Badger G.J. Incentives improve outcome in outpatient behavioral treatment of cocaine dependence. Am. J. Psychiatry 1994, 51:568-576.
11. Higgins S.T., Delaney D.D., Budney A.J., Bickel W.K., Hughes J.R., Foerg F., Fenwick J.W. A behavioral approach to achieving initial cocaine abstinence. Am. J. Psychiatry 1991, 148:1218-1224.
12. Higgins S.T., Badger G.J., Budney A.J. Initial abstinence and success in achieving longer term cocaine abstinence. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2000, 8:377-386.
13. Higgins S.T., Heil S.H., Dantona R., Donham R., Matthews M., Badger G.J. Effects of varying the monetary value of voucher-based incentives on abstinence achieved during and following treatment among cocaine-dependent outpatients. Addiction 2007, 102:271-281.
14. Hofmeyr A., Ainslie G., Charlton R., Ross D. The relationship between addiction and reward bundling: an experiment comparing smokers and non-smokers. Addiction 2010, 106:402-409.
15. Mobini S., Body S., Ho M.Y., Bradshaw C.M., Szabadi E., Deakin J.F., Anderson I.M. Effects of lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex on sensitivity to delayed and probabilistic reinforcement. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 2002, 160:290-298.
16. Nader M.A., Hedeker D., Woolverton W.L. Behavioral economics and drug choice: effects of unit price on cocaine self-administration by monkeys. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1993, 33:193-199.
17. Nader M.A., Woolverton W.L. Effects of increasing the magnitude of an alternative reinforce on drug choice in a discrete-trials choice procedure. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 1991, 105:169-174.
18. Peitz G.W., Strickland J.C., Pitts E.G., Foley M., Tonidandel S., Smith M.A. Peer influences on drug self-administration: an econometric analysis in socially housed rats. Behav. Pharmacol. 2013, 24:114-123.
19. Petry N.M., Martin B., Simcic F. Prize reinforcement contingency management for cocaine dependence: integration with group therapy in a methadone clinic. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 2005, 73:354-359.
20. Petry N.M., Tedford J., Austin M., Nich C., Carroll K.M., Rounsaville B.J. Prize reinforcement contingency management for treating cocaine users: how low can we go, and with whom?. Addiction 2004, 99:349-360.
21. Rachlin H., Raineri A., Cross D. Subjective probability and delay. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 1991, 55:233-244.
22. Rodefer J.S., Mattox A.J., Thompson S.S., Carroll M.E. Effects of buprenorphine and an alternative nondrug reinforcer, alone and in combination on smoked cocaine self-administration in monkeys. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1997, 45:21-29.
23. Roll J.M., Higgins S.T. A within-subject comparison of three different schedules of reinforcement using cigarette smoking as an exemplar. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2000, 58:103-109.
24. Roll J.M., Higgins S.T., Badger G.J. An experimental comparison of three different schedules of reinforcement of drug abstinence using cigarette smoking as an exemplar. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 1996, 29:495-505.
25. Roll J.M., Howard J.T. The relative contribution of economic valence to contingency management efficacy: a pilot study. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 2008, 41:629-633.
26. Roll J.M., Shoptaw S. Contingency management: schedule effects. Psychiatry Res. 2006, 144:91-93.
27. Rothfleisch J., Elk R., Rhoades H., Schmitz J. Use of monetary reinforcers by cocaine-dependent outpatients. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 1999, 17:229-236.
28. Sharp M.E., Viswanathan J., Lanyon L.J., Barton J.J.S. Sensitivity and bias in decision-making under risk: evaluating the perception of reward, its probability and value. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e33460.
29. Shimp C.P. Probabilistically reinforced choice behavior in pigeons. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 1966, 9:443-455.
30. Stoops W.W., Lile J.A., Glaser P.E.A., Hays L.R., Rush C.R. Alternative reinforcer response cost impacts cocaine choice in humans. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2012, 36:189-193.
31. Woolverton W.L., English J.A., Weed M.R. Choice between cocaine and food in a discrete-trials procedure in monkeys: a unit price analysis. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 1997, 133:269-274.
32. Zachary R.A. Shipley Institute of Living Scale: Revised Manual 1991, Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles, CA.