The relationship between addiction and reward bundling: An experiment comparing smokers and non-smokers

Addiction

Volumn 106, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 402-409

  Hofmeyr, Andre ^a   Ainslie, George ^a,b   Charlton, Richard ^a   Ross, Don ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Preferences; Reward bundling; Smokers; Temporal reward discounting; Willpower

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REWARD; SMOKING; TIME;

BEHAVIOR, ADDICTIVE; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; REWARD; SMOKING; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78650811229     PISSN: 09652140     EISSN: 13600443     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03166.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Heyman G. Addiction: A Disorder of Choice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2009.
2. Bickel W. K., Marsch L. A. Toward a behavioral economic understanding of drug dependence: delay discounting processes. Addiction 2001; 96: 73-86.
3. Goldstein R. Z., Volkow N. D. Drug addiction and its underlying neurophysiological basis: neuroimaging evidence for the involvement of the frontal cortex. Am J Psychiatry 2002; 159: 1642-52.
4. Ainslie G. Picoeconomics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
5. Bodner R., Prelec D. The diagnostic value of actions in a self-signaling model. In: Brocas I., Carillo J. D., editors. The Psychology of Economic Decisions. Vol II: Reasons and Choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001, p. 105-23.
6. Ainslie G. Précis of Breakdown of Will. Behav Brain Sci 2005; 28: 635-73.
7. Bénabou R., Tirole J. Willpower and personal rules. J Polit Econ 2004; 112: 848-86.
8. Ross D. Economic Theory and Cognitive Science: Microexplanation. Cambridge MA: MIT Press; 2005.
9. Kirby K., Guastello B. Making choices in anticipation of similar future choices can increase self-control. J Exp Psychol 2001; Applied 7: 154-64.
10. Mitchell S. Measuring impulsivity and modeling its association with cigarette smoking. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev 2004; 3: 261-75.
11. WHO ASSIST Working Group. The Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST): development, reliability and feasibility. Addiction 2002; 97: 1183-94.
12. Ferris J., Wynne H. The Canadian Problem Gambling Index: Final Report. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse; 2001.
13. Coller M., Williams M. Eliciting individual discount rates. Exp Econ 1999, 2: 107-27.
14. Loewenstein G. Out of control: visceral influences on behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1996; 35: 272-92.
15. McClure S., Laibson D., Loewenstein G., Cohen J. The grasshopper and the ant: separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science 2004; 306: 503-7.
16. Bickel W., Odum A., Madden G. Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: delay discounting in current, never, and ex-smokers. Psychopharmacology 1999; 146: 447-54.
17. Chow G. C. Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica 1960; 28: 591-605.
18. Ainslie G. Specious reward: a psychological theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychol Bull 1975; 82: 463-96.
19. Green L., Myerson J. A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychol Bull 2004; 130: 769-92.
20. Kirby K. Bidding on the future: evidence against normative discounting of delayed rewards. J Exp Psychol 1997; 126: 54-70.
21. Mazur J. Hyperbolic value addition and general models of animal choice. Psychol Rev 2001; 108: 96-112.
22. Loewenstein G., Prelec D. Anomalies in intertemporal choice: evidence and an interpretation. Q J Econ 1992; 107: 573-97.
23. Laibson D. Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Q J Econ 1997; 112: 443-77.
24. Ainslie G., Monterosso J. Building blocks of self-control: increased tolerance for delay with bundled rewards. J Exp Anal Behav 2003; 79: 37-48.