A computationally efficient approach for template matching-based image registration

Sadhana - Academy Proceedings in Engineering Sciences

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 317-331

  Gaidhane, Vilas H ^a   Hote, Yogesh V ^b   Singh, Vijander ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELHI   (India)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ROORKEE   (India)

Author keywords

covariance matrix; eigenvalue; Normalized cross correlation; similarity measure; template matching

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL EFFICIENCY; COVARIANCE MATRIX; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; IMAGE REGISTRATION; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS;

COMPUTATIONALLY EFFICIENT; EIGEN-VALUE; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENVECTORS; GEOMETRIC TRANSFORMATIONS; NORMALIZED COVARIANCE; NORMALIZED CROSS CORRELATION; SIMILARITY MEASURE;

TEMPLATE MATCHING;

EID: 84899956958     PISSN: 02562499     EISSN: 09737677     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12046-014-0230-0     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Austvoll I and Kwolek B 2010 Region covariance matrix-based object tracking with occlusions handling. Comput. Vis. Graph. (LNCS) 6374: 201-208.
2. Förstner W 1987 Reliability analysis of parameter estimation in linear models with applications to mensuration problems in computer vision. Comput. Vision Graphics Image Process. 40: 273-310.
3. Gaidhane V H, Hote Y V and Singh V 2012a An efficient similarity measure technique for medical image registration. Sadhana. 37: 709-721.
4. Gaidhane V H, Hote Y V and Singh V 2012b Nonrigid image registration using efficient similarity measure and Levenberg-Marquardt optimization. Biomed. Eng. Lett. 2: 118-123.
5. Gao Z, Guand B and Lin J 2008 Monomodal image registration using mutual information based methods. Image Vision Comput. 26: 164-173.
6. thEuro Conf. Comp. Vision 539-553.
7. Johnson K A and Becker J A 1999 The Whole Brain, Atlas, Harvard Medical School, www. med. harvard. Edu/aanlib.
8. Kanazawa Y and Kanatani K 2001 Do we really have to consider covariance matrices for image feature? Proc. Int. Conf. Comput. Vision (ICCV'1). 301-306.
9. Li M and Yuan B 2005 2D-LDA: A statistical linear discriminant analysis for image matrix. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 26: 527-532.
10. Maltoni D, Maio D, Jain A K and Prabhakar S 2009 Handbook of fingerprint recognition (DB1_B Dataset). Second Edition, London, Springer.
11. Matungta R, Zheng Y F and Ewing R L 2009 Image registration using adaptive polar transform. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 18: 2340-2354.
12. Ohta N 1991 Image movement detection with reliability indices. IEICE Trans. E74-10: 3379-3388.
13. Penney G P, Weese J, Little J A, Desmedt P, Hill D L G and Hawkes D J 1998 A comparison of similarity measures for use in 2D-3D medical image registration. IEEE Trans. Med. Image. 17: 586-595.
14. Rohr K, Cathier P and Worz S 2004 Elastic registration of electrophoresis images using intensity information and point landmarks. Pattern Recognit. 37: 1035-1048.
15. Sarvaiya J N, Patnaik S and Bombaywala S 2009 Image registration by template matching using normalized cross-correlation. Proc. Int. Conf. Advances in Computing, Control, and Telecommunication Technologies (Trivandrum, India). 819-822.
16. Stefano L D and Matteccia S 2003 Fast template matching using bounded partial correlation. Mach. Vis. Appl. 13: 213-221.
17. Sun T H, Liu C H and Tien F C 2008 Invariant 2D object recognition using eigenvalues of covariance matrices, re-sampling and autocorrelation. Expert Sys Appl. 35: 1966-1977.
18. Tsai D M and Yang R H 2005 An eigenvalue-based similarity measure and its applications in defect detection. Image Vision Comput. 23: 1094-1101.
19. USC-SIPI Image Database Univ. of Southern Calif. Signal and Image Processing Inst., http://sipi. usc. edu/services/database/Database. html.
20. Viola P and Wells W M 1997 Alignment by maximization of mutual information. Int. J. Comput. Vision 24: 137-154.
21. Xu Y, Yang J Y and Jin Z 2004 A novel method for Fisher discrimination analysis. Pattern Recognit. 37: 381-384.
22. Zitová B and Flusser J 2003 Image registration methods: A survey. Image Vision Comput. 21: 977-1000.
23. Zokai S and Wolberg G 2005 Image registration using log-polar mappings for recovery of large-scale similarity and projective transformation. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 14: 1422-1434.