Twenty-First Century Science as a Relational Process: From Eureka! To Team Science and a Place for Community Psychology

American Journal of Community Psychology

Volumn 53, Issue 3-4, 2014, Pages 475-490

  Tebes, Jacob Kraemer ^a   Thai, Nghi D ^b   Matlin, Samantha L ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b CENTRAL CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

CBPR; Heterarchy; Perspectivism; Philosophy of science; Team science; Transdisciplinary

Indexed keywords

COOPERATION; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH; SCIENCE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL; RESEARCH; SCIENCE;

EID: 84899952474     PISSN: 00910562     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10464-014-9625-7     Document Type: Article

References (112)

1. Abrams, D. B. (2006). Applying transdisciplinary research strategies to understanding and eliminating health disparities. Health Education and Behavior, 33(4), 515-531.
2. Adler, N., & Stewart, J. (2010). Using team science to address health disparities: MacArthur network as case example. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1186, 252-260.
3. Andrews, J. O., Tingen, M. S., Jarriel, S. C., Caleb, M., Simmons, A., Brunson, J., et al. (2012). Application of a CBPR framework to inform a multi-level tobacco cessation intervention in public housing neighborhoods. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50, 129-140.
4. Arnsten, A., Mazure, C., & Sinha, R. (2012). This is your brain in meltdown. Scientific American, 306, 50-53.
5. Bennett, L. M., & Gadlin, H. (2012). Collaboration and team science: From theory to practice. Journal of Investigative Medicine, 60, 768-775.
6. Börner, K., Contractor, N., Falk-Krzesinski, H. J., Fiore, S. M., Hall, K. L., Keyton, J., et al. (2010). A multi-level systems perspective for the science of team science. Science Translational Medicine, 2(49), 1-5.
7. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press.
8. Butterfoss, F. D. (2007). Coalitions and partnerships in community health. San Francisco: Jossey.
9. Cauce, A. M. (2011). Is multicultural psychology a-scientific? Diverse methods for diversity research. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Pyschology, 17, 228-233.
10. Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2009). Connected: The surprising power of our networks and how they shape our lives. New York: Little, Brown, and Co.
11. Cilliers, P. (1998). Complexity and postmodernism. London: Routledge.
12. Cilliers, P. (2001). Boundaries, hierarchies, and networks in complex systems. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5, 135-147.
13. Cilliers, P. (2013). Understanding complex systems. In J. P. Sturmberg & C. M. Martin (Eds.), Handbook of systems and complexity in health (pp. 27-38). New York: Springer.
14. Clinical and Translational Science Awards Consortium (2011). Principles of Community Engagement, (2nd Ed). NIH Publ No. 11-7782. Rockville, MD: U. S. Government Printing Office.
15. Cohen, A. B. (2009). Many forms of culture. American Psychologist, 64, 194-204.
16. Cook, T. D. (1985). Postpositivist critical multiplism. In L. Shotland & M. M. Mark (Eds.), Social science and social policy (pp. 21-62). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
17. Dampier, W. C. (1948). A history of science and its relations with philosophy and religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Domino, S. E., Bodurtha, J., Nagel, J. D., & The BIRCWH Program Leadership. (2011). Interdisciplinary research career development: Building interdisciplinary research careers in women's health program best practices. Journal of Women's Health, 20, 1587-1601.
19. Dunbar, K. (2000). How scientists think in the real world. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21, 49-58.
20. Flaspohler, P., Lesesne, C. A., Puddy, R. W., & Smith, E. (2012). Advances in bridging research and practice: Introduction to the second special issue on the interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50, 271-281.
21. Ford, D. H., & Lerner, R. M. (1992). Developmental systems theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Gearhardt, A. N., Grilo, C. M., DiLeone, R. J., Brownell, K. D., & Potenza, M. N. (2011). Can food be addictive? Public health and policy implications. Addiction, 106, 1208-1212.
23. Gibbons, M., Limoges, H., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge. London: Sage.
24. Giere, R. N. (2006). Scientific perspectivism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Giere, R. N., & Moffatt, B. (2003). Distributed cognition: Where the cognitive and the social merge. Social Studies of Science, 33, 301-310.
26. Godin, B. (1998). Writing performative history: The new new Atlantis? Social Studies of Science, 28, 465-483.
27. Gone, J. P. (2011). Is psychological science a-cultural? Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 17, 234-242.
28. Hall, K. L., Stokols, D., Stipelman, B. A., Vogel, A. L., Feng, A., Masimore, B., et al. (2012). Assessing the value of team science: A study comparing center- and investigator initiated grants. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 42, 157-163.
29. Hessels, L. K., & van Lente, H. (2008). Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda. Research Policy, 37, 740-760.
30. Holland, J. B. (2012). Signals and boundaries: Building blocks for complex adaptive systems. Cambridge: MIT Press.
31. International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium, Lander, E. S., Linton, L. M., Birren, B., Nusbaum, C., Zody, M. C., et al. (2001). Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature, 409, 860-921.
32. Irwin, A. (2008). Perspectives on scientific governance. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (3rd ed., pp. 583-607). Cambridge: MIT Press.
33. Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. (1998). Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19, 173-202.
34. Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., Becker, A. B., Allen, A. J., & Guzman, J. R. (2008). Critical issues in developing and following community-based participatory research principles. In M. Winkler & N. Wallerstein (Eds.), Community-based participatory research for health (pp. 47-65). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35. Jasanoff, S. (2005). Designs on nature: Science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36. Jason, L. A., Keys, C., Suarez-Balcazar, Y., Taylor, R. R., Davis, M. I., Durlak, J., et al. (Eds.). (2004). Participatory community research. Washington, DC: APA.
37. Kahn, R. L., & Praeger, D. J. (1994). Interdisciplinary collaborations are a scientific and social imperative. The Scientist, 8, 12.
38. Kelly, J. G. (1966). Ecological constraints on mental health services. American Psychologist, 21, 535-539.
39. Kelly, J. G. (1988). A guide to conducting prevention research in the community. New York: Haworth.
40. Kessel, F., Rosenfield, P. L., & Anderson, N. B. (Eds.). (2008). Interdisciplinary research: Case studies from health and social science. New York: Oxford Press.
41. Kloos, B., Hill, J., Thomas, E., Wandersman, A., Elias, M. J., & Dalton, J. (2012). Community psychology: Linking individuals and communities (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
42. Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43. Kon, A. A. (2008). The clinical and translational science award (CTSA) consortium and the translational research model. American Journal of Bioethics, 8, 58-60.
44. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45. Laudan, L. (1990). Normative naturalism. Philosophy of Science, 57, 44-59.
46. Levine, M., Perkins, D. V., & Perkins, D. (2005). Principles of community psychology (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford.
47. Lindau, T. S., Makelarski, J. A., Chin, M. H., Desautels, S., Johnson, D., Johnson, W. E., Jr, et al. (2011). Building community-engaged health research and discovery infrastructure on the South Side of Chicago: Science in service to community priorities. Preventive Medicine, 52, 200-207.
48. Manicas, P. T., & Secord, P. F. (1983). Implications for psychology of the new philosophy of science. American Psychology, 38, 399-413.
49. Matlin, S. L., Evans, A. C., & Tebes, J. K. (2014). Beauty, connection, healing, and behavioral health: The role of public art in promoting wellness. In J. Golden & Mural Arts Associates (Eds.), Mural Arts at 30: Growing up, growing out, putting down roots. Philadelphia, PA: Philadelphia Mural Arts Program.
50. Maton, K. I., Perkins, D. D., & Saegert, S. (2006). Community psychology at the crossroads: Prospects for interdisciplinary research. American J Community Psychology, 38, 9-21.
51. McGuire, W. J. (1986). A perspectivist looks at contextualism and the future of behavioral science. In R. L. Rosnow & M. Georgundi (Eds.), Contextualism and understanding in behavioral science (pp. 271-303). New York: Pergamon Press.
52. McGuire, W. J. (1989). A perspectivist approach to strategic planning of programmatic scientific research. In B. Gholson, W. R. Shadish, R. A. Niemeyer, & A. C. Houts (Eds.), The psychology of science: Contributions to metascience (pp. 214-245). New York: Cambridge.
53. McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: Theory and definition. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6-23.
54. Miller, J. H., & Page, S. E. (2007). Complex adaptive systems: Computational models for social life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
55. Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (2008). Community-based participatory research for health: From processes to outcomes. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
56. Mirowski, P., & Sent, E.-M. (2008). The commercialization of science and the response of STS. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (3rd ed., pp. 635-689). Cambridge: MIT Press.
57. Mohatt, N. V., Singer, J. B., Evans, A. C., Jr, Matlin, S. L., Golden, J., Harris, C., et al. (2013). A community's response to suicide through public art: Stakeholder perspectives from the Finding the Light Within project. American Journal of Community Psychology, 52, 197-209.
58. Moody, C. M., & Kaiser, D. (2008). Scientific training and the creation of scientific knowledge. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (3rd ed., pp. 376-402). Cambridge: MIT Press.
59. Moritsugu, J., Wong, F. Y., & Duffy, F. G. (2010). Community psychology (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
60. Nash, J. M., Collins, B. N., Loughlin, S. E., Solbrig, M., Harvey, R., & Krishnan-Sarin, S. (2003). Training the transdisciplinary scientist: A general framework applied to tobacco use behavior. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 5, S41-S53.
61. National Institutes of Health (NIH). (2006a). Institutional Clinical and Translational Science Award (U54). http://grants. nih. gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-TR-12-006. html.
62. National Institutes of Health (NIH). (2006b). Establishment of Multiple Principal Investigator Awards for the Support of Team Science Projects. NOT-OD-07-017. http://grants. nih. gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-07-017. html.
63. National Science Foundation. (2005). Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research and Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. National Academy of Science, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. Washington: National Academies Press.
64. Neal, Z. P., & Neal, J. W. (2013). The (In)compatibility of diversity and sense of community. American Journal of Community Psychology. doi: 10. 1007/s10464-013-9608-0.
65. Nelson, G., & Prilleltensky, I. (2010). Community psychology: In pursuit of liberation and well-being, United Kingdom. Europe: Palgrave MacMillan.
66. Newman, M. E. J. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(2), 404-409. doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 021544898.
67. Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2003a). Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
68. Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2003b). "Mode 2" revisited: The new production of knowledge. Minerva, 41, 179-194.
69. Orford, J. (2008). Community psychology: Challenges, controversies, and emerging consensus. West Sussex, England: Wiley.
70. Porter, A. L., & Rafols, I. (2009). Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics, 81, 719-745.
71. Rappaport, J. (1977). Community psychology: Values, research, and action. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
72. Rappaport, J. (2005). Community psychology is (thank God) more than science. American Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 231-238.
73. Rosenfield, P. L. (1992). The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Social Science Medicine, 35(11), 1343-1357.
74. Salazar, M. R., Lant, T. K., Fiore, S. M., & Salas, E. (2012). Facilitating innovation in diverse science teams through integrative capacity. Small Group Research, 43, 527-558.
75. Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918-924.
76. Sarason, S. B. (1974). Psychological sense of community: Prospects for a community psychology. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
77. Seidman, E. (1988). Back to the future, community psychology: Unfolding a theory of social intervention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 3-24.
78. Shadish, W. R., Cook, R. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
79. Shepard, P. M., Idehen, Al., Casado, J., Freeman, E., Horowitz, C., Seifer, S., et al. (2013). Amplifying the community voice in community-academic partnerships: A summary of and commentary on a thematic issue. Progress in Community Health Partnerships, 7, 231-233.
80. Shields, S. A. (2008). Gender: An intersectionality perspective. Sex Roles, 59, 301-311.
81. Shinn, M., & Toohey, S. M. (2003). Community contexts of human welfare. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 427-459.
82. Silver, B. (1998). The ascent of science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
83. Society for Community Research and Action (SCRA). (2012). Competencies for community psychology practice. The Community Psychologist, 45, 8-14.
84. Stokols, D. (2006). Toward a science of transdisciplinary action research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 63-77.
85. Stokols, D., Fuqua, J., Gress, J., Harvey, R., Phillips, K., & Baezconde-Garbanati, L. (2003). Evaluating transdisciplinary science. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 5(Suppl 1), S21-S39.
86. Stokols, D., Harvey, R., Gress, J., Fuqua, J., & Phillips, K. (2005). In vivo studies of transdisciplinary scientific collaboration: Lessons learned and implications for active living research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(Suppl 2), 202-213.
87. Stokols, D., Misra, S., Moser, R. P., Hall, K. L., & Taylor, B. K. (2008). The Ecology of team science: Understanding contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35, S96-S115.
88. Suppe, F. (1977). The structure of scientific theories (2nd ed.). Urbana, IL: Univ of Illinois Press.
89. Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds. New York: Doubleday.
90. Susskind, E. C., & Klein, D. C. (1985). Community research: Methods, paradigms, and applications. New York: Praeger Scientific.
91. Tebes, J. K. (2005). Community science, philosophy of science, and the practice of research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 213-235.
92. Tebes, J. K. (2010). Community psychology, diversity, and the many forms of culture. American Psychologist, 65, 58-59.
93. Tebes, J. K. (2012a). Philosophical foundations of mixed methods research: Implications for research practice. In L. Jason & D. Glenwick (Eds.), Innovative methodological approaches to community-based research (pp. 13-31). Washington, DC: APA Books.
94. Tebes, J. K. (2012b). Evaluation of interdisciplinary team science: Current status and future directions. Invited Address, Presidential Program, 212nd Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Orlando, FL.
95. Tebes, J. K., Matlin, S., Evans, A. C., Golden, J. H., & Ansell, S. (2012). Individual and community recovery and transformation through public art: A mixed methods comparative outcome trial. Address to the American Psychiatric Association Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA.
96. Tebes, J. K., Kaufman, J. S., Connell, C. M., Crusto, C. A., & Thai, N. D. (2014). Evaluation in prevention and health promotion. In T. P. Gullotta & M. Bloom (Eds.), Encyclopedia of primary prevention and health promotion (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
97. Terry, S. F., & Leshner, A. I. (2013). Assessing NIH's big idea. Science Translational Medicine, 5, 1-2.
98. Thomas, L. R., Rosa, C., Forcehimes, A., & Donovan, D. (2011). Research partnerships between academic institutions and American Indian and Alaska Native Tribes and organizations: Effective strategies and lessons learned in a multisite CTN study. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 37, 333-338.
99. Tolan, P., Keys, C., Chertok, F., & Jason, L. (Eds.). (1990). Researching community psychology: Issues of theory and methods. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
100. Townley, G., Kloos, B., Green, E. P., & Franco, M. M. (2011). Reconcilable differences? Human diversity, cultural relativity, and sense of community. American Journal of Community Psychology, 47, 69-85.
101. Trickett, E. J. (1996). A future for community psychology: The contexts of diversity and the diversity of contexts. American Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 209-234.
102. Trickett, E. J., & Schensul, J. (2009). Summary comments: Multi-level community based culturally situated community interventions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 43, 377-381.
103. Trickett, E. J., Beehler, S., Deutsch, C., Green, L. W., Hawe, P., McLeroy, K., et al. (2011). Advancing the science of community-level interventions. American Journal of Public Health, 101, 1410-1419.
104. Varda, D., Shoup, J. A., & Miller, A. (2012). A systematic review of collaboration and network research in the public affairs literature: Implications for public health practice and research. American Journal of Public Health, 102, 564-571.
105. Venter, J. C., Adams, M. D., Myers, E. W., Li, P. W., Mural, R. J., Sutton, G. G., et al. (2001). The sequence of the human genome. Science, 291, 1304-1351.
106. Watzlawick, P., Weakland, N. C., & Firsch, R. (1974). Change: Principles of problem formation and problem resolution. New York: Norton.
107. Westfall, J. M., Mold, J., & Fagnan, L. (2007). Practice-based research-"Blue highways" on the NIH roadmap. Journal of the American Medical Association, 297, 403-406.
108. Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316, 1036-1038.
109. Yancey, E. M., Mayberry, R., Armstrong-Mensah, E., Collins, D., Goodin, L., Cureton, S., et al. (2012). The community-based participatory intervention effect of "HIVRAAP". American Journal of Health Behavior, 36(4), 555-568. doi: 10. 5993/AJHB. 36. 4. 12.
110. Yoshikawa, H. (2006). Placing community psychology in the context of the social, health, and educational sciences: Directions for interdisciplinary research and action. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 31-34.
111. Zerhouni, E. (2003). The NIH roadmap. Science, 302, 63-72.
112. Zerhouni, E. A. (2007). Translational research: Moving discovery to practice. Nature, 81, 126-128.