June 1989 and beyond: Julia Brannen's contribution to mixed methods research

International Journal of Social Research Methodology

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 121-131

  Bryman, Alan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Julia Brannen; mixed methods research; qualitative research; quality issues; quantitative research

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899937174     PISSN: 13645579     EISSN: 14645300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2014.892653     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Brannen, J. (1992a). Introduction. In J. Brannen (Ed.), Mixing methods: Qualitative and quantitative research (pp. xi-xvi). Aldershot: Ashgate.
2. Brannen, J. (1992b). Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches: An overview. In J. Brannen (Ed.), Mixing methods: Qualitative and quantitative research (pp. 3-37). Aldershot: Ashgate.
3. Brannen, J. (2004). Working qualitatively and quantitatively. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 312-326). London: Sage.
4. Brannen, J. (2005). Mixed methods research: A discussion paper. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, NCRM/005. Retrieved August 30, 2013, from http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/89/
5. Brannen, J. (2008). The practice of a mixed methods research strategy: Personal, professional and project considerations. In M. M. Bergman (Ed.), Advances in mixed methods research (pp. 53-65). London: Sage.
6. Brannen, J., Dodd, K., Oakley, A., & Storey, P. (1994). Young people, health, and family life. Buckingham: Open University Press.
7. Brannen, J., Heptinstall, E., & Bhopal, K. (2000). Connecting children: Care and family life in later childhood. London: Routledge Farmer.
8. Brannen, J., & Moss, P. (1991). Managing mothers: Dual earner households after maternity leave. London: Unwin Hyman.
9. Brannen, J., & Moss, G. (2012). Critical issues in designing mixed methods policy research. American Behavioral Scientist, 56, 789-801.
10. Brannen, J., Statham, J., Mooney, A., & Brockmann, M. (2007). Coming to care: The work and family lives of workers caring for vulnerable children. Bristol: Policy Press.
11. Bryman, A. (1988). Quantity and quality in social research. London: Routledge.
12. Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6, 97-113.
13. Bryman, A. (2007a). Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 8-22.
14. Bryman, A. (2007b). The research question in social research: What is its role? International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 10, 5-20.
15. Bryman, A., Becker, S., & Sempik, J. (2008). Quality criteria for quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods research: A view from social policy. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11, 261-276.
16. Collins, K. M. T., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Johnson, R. B. (2012). Securing a place at the table: A review and extension of legitimation criteria for the conduct of mixed research. American Behavioral Scientist, 56, 849-865.
17. Creswell, J. W. (2011). Controversies in mixed methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 269-284). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
18. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
19. Heyvaert, M., Hannes, K., Maes, B., & Onghena, P. (2013). Critical appraisal of mixed methods studies. Journal of Mixed Methods Studies, 7, 302-327.
20. Molina-Azorin, J. (2012). Mixed methods research in strategic management: Impact and applications. Organizational Research Methods, 15, 33-56.
21. Morgan, D. L. (1998). Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: Applications to health research. Qualitative Health Research, 8, 362-376.
22. Morse, J. M. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40, 120-123.
23. Niglas, K. (2004). The combined use of qualitative and quantitative methods in educational research (Dissertation on Social Sciences). Tallinn Pedagogical University, Tallinn, Estonia.
24. O'Cathain, A. (2010). Assessing the quality of mixed methods research: Toward a comprehensive framework. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 531-555). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
25. O'Cathain, A., Murphy, E., & Nicholl, J. (2007). Integration and publications as indicators of "yield" from mixed methods studies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 147-163.
26. O'Cathain, A., Murphy, E., & Nicholl, J. (2008). The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 13, 92-98.
27. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Johnson, R. B., & Collins, K. M. T. (2011). A framework for assessing legitimation in mixed research. Quality & Quantity, 45, 1253-1271.
28. Platt, J. (1996). A history of sociological research methods in America 1920-1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., & Dillon, L. (2003). Quality in qualitative evaluation: A framework for assessing research evidence. London: Government Chief Social Researcher's Office. Retrieved September 6, 2013, from www.civilservice.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/a_quality_framework_tcm6-38740.pdf
30. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2008). Quality of inferences in mixed methods research: Calling for an integrative framework. In M. M. Bergman (Ed.), Advances in mixed methods research (pp. 101-119). London: Sage.
31. Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight 'big tent' criteria for excellent qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16, 837-851.
32. Woolley, C. M. (2009). Meeting the mixed methods challenge of integration in a sociological study of structure and agency. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3, 7-25.