Mechanism design for abstract argumentation

Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS

Volumn 2, Issue , 2008, Pages 1013-1020

  Rahwan, Iyad ^a,b   Larson, Kate ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b THE BRITISH UNIVERSITY IN DUBAI   (United Arab Emirates)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Game theory; Mechanism design

Indexed keywords

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS; GAME THEORY; MACHINE DESIGN; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS;

ABSTRACT ARGUMENTATION; ARGUMENTATION; ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS; COMPUTATIONAL APPROACH; DESIGN AND ANALYSIS; DOMINANT STRATEGY; MECHANISM DESIGN; SELF-INTERESTED AGENTS;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 84899927820     PISSN: 15488403     EISSN: 15582914     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. P. Baroni and M. Giacomin. On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics. Artificial Intelligence, 171(10-15):675-700, 2007.
2. S. Coste-Marquis, C. Devred, S. Konieczny, M.-C. Lagasquie-Schiex, and P. Marquis. On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems. Artificial Intelligence, 171(10-15):730-753, 2007.
3. P. M. Dung. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77(2):321-358, 1995.
4. J. Glazer and A. Rubinstein. Debates and decisions: On a rationale of argumentation rules. Games and Economic Behavior, 36:158-173, 2001.
5. A. Mas-Colell, M. D. Whinston, and J. R. Green. Microeconomic Theory. Oxford University Press. New York NY, USA, 1995.
6. S. Parsons, M. J. Wooldridge, and L. Amgoud. Properties and complexity of formal inter-agent dialogues. Journal of Logic and Computation, 13(3):347-376, 2003.
7. A. D. Procaccia and J. S. Rosenschein. Extensive-form argumentation games. In Proceedings of the Third European Workshop on Multi-Agent Systems (EUMAS-05), Brussels, Belgium, pages 312-322, 2005.