Sensitivity analysis of the unconfoundedness assumption with an application to an evaluation of college choice effects on earnings

Journal of Applied Statistics

Volumn 41, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 1767-1784

  de Luna, Xavier ^a   Lundin, Mathias ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

causal inference; effects of education; propensity score; register data

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899913516     PISSN: 02664763     EISSN: 13600532     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2014.890178     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. J. Altonji, T. Elder, and C. Taber, Selection on observed and unobserved variables: Assessing the effectiveness of catholic schools, J. Political Econ. 113(1) (2005), pp. 151-184. doi: 10.1086/426036
2. J. Antelius and A. Björklund, How reliable are register data for studies of the return on schooling? An examination of Swedish data, Scand. J. Educ. Res. 44(4) (2000), pp. 341-355. doi: 10.1080/713696679
3. D. Black and J. Smith, How robust is the evidence on the effects of college quality? Evidence from matching, J. Econ. 121(1-2) (2004), pp. 99-124. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2003.10.006
4. D. Brewer, E. Eide, and R. Ehrenberg, Does it pay to attend an elite private college? Cross-cohort evidence on the effects of college type on earnings, J. Human Resour. 34(1) (1999), pp. 104-123. doi: 10.2307/146304
5. J. Copas and S. Eguchi, Local sensitivity approximations for selectivity bias, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 63(4) (2001), pp. 871-895. doi: 10.1111/1467-9868.00318
6. J. Copas and S. Eguchi, Local model uncertainty and incomplete-data bias, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 67(4) (2005), pp. 459-513. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00512.x
7. J. Copas and H. Li, Inference for non-random samples, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 59(1) (1997), pp. 55-95. doi: 10.1111/1467-9868.00055
8. S. Dale and A. Krueger, Estimating the payoff to attending a more selective college: An application of selection on observables and unobservables, Quart. J. Econ. 117(4) (2002), pp. 1491-1527. doi: 10.1162/003355302320935089
9. T. DiPrete and M. Gangl, Assessing bias in the estimation of causal effects: Rosenbaum bounds on matching estimators and instrumental variables estimation with imperfect instruments, Sociolog. Methodol. 34(1) (2004), pp. 271-310. doi: 10.1111/j.0081-1750.2004.00154.x
10. D. Draper, Assessment and propagation of model uncertainty, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Methodol. (1995), pp. 45-97.
11. K. Eliasson, College Choice and Earnings among University Graduates in Sweden, Umeå Economic Studies, 2006.
12. A. Gelman, J. Carlin, H. Stern, and D. Rubin, Bayesian Data Analysis, Chapman and Hall, London, 1995.
13. S. Greenland, Multiple-bias modelling for analysis of observational data, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A Stat. Soc. 168(2) (2005), pp. 267-306. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2004.00349.x
14. D. Harding, Counterfactual models of neighborhood effects: The effect of neighborhood poverty on dropping out and teenage pregnancy, Am. J. Soc. 109(3) (2003), pp. 676-719. doi: 10.1086/379217
15. T.J. Hastie and R. Tibshirani, Generalized Additive Models, Chapman and Hall, London, 1990.
16. J. Heckman, The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models, Ann. Econ. Social Meas. 5(4) (1976), pp. 475-492.
17. J. Heckman, Sample selection bias as a specification error, Econometrica: J. Econom. Soc. (1979), pp. 153-161. doi: 10.2307/1912352
18. M. Hoekstra, The effect of attending the flagship state university on earnings: A discontinuity-based approach, Rev. Econ. Stat. 91(4) (2009), pp. 717-724. doi: 10.1162/rest.91.4.717
19. A. Ichino, F. Mealli, and T. Nannicini, From temporary help jobs to permanent employment: What can we learn from matching estimators and their sensitivity? J. Appl. Econ. 23(3) (2008), pp. 305-327. doi: 10.1002/jae.998
20. G.W. Imbens, Sensitivity to exogeneity assumptions in program evaluation, Am. Econ. Rev. 93(2) (2003), pp. 126-132. doi: 10.1257/000282803321946921
21. L. Lindahl and H. Regnér, College choice and subsequent earnings: Results using Swedish sibling data, Scand. J. Econ. 107(3) (2005), pp. 437-457. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9442.2005.00417.x
22. R. Little, A note about models for selectivity bias, Econometrica: J. Econ. Soc. (1985), pp. 1469-1474. doi: 10.2307/1913222
23. M. Long, Changes in the returns to education and college quality, Econ. Educ. Rev. 29(3) (2010), pp. 338-347. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.10.005
24. X. de Luna and P. Johansson, Exogeneity in structural equation models, J. Econ. 132(2) (2006), pp. 527-543. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.02.010
25. M. Lundin, Sensitivity analysis of untestable assumptions in causal inference, Ph.D. diss., Umeå University, 2011.
26. C. Manski, Nonparametric bounds on treatment effects, Am. Econ. Rev. 80(2) (1990), pp. 319-323.
27. B. Morgan, Elements of Simulation, Vol. 194. Chapman and Hall/CRC, London, 1984.
28. J. Neyman, 1990. On the application of probability theory to agricultural experiments. Essay on principles. Section 9. Translated and edited by DM Dabrowska and TP speed, Stat. Sci. 5 (1923), pp. 465-471.
29. P. Rosenbaum, Observational Studies, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2002.
30. P.R. Rosenbaum and D.B. Rubin, The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects, Biometrika 70(1) (1983), pp. 41-55. doi: 10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
31. D.B. Rubin, Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies, J. Educ. Psych. 66 (1974), 688-701. doi: 10.1037/h0037350
32. S. Wood, Thin plate regression splines, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 65(1) (2003), pp. 95-114. doi: 10.1111/1467-9868.00374
33. S. Wood and N. Augustin, GAMs with integrated model selection using penalized regression splines and applications to environmental modelling, Ecol. Model. 157(2) (2002), pp. 157-177. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00193-X