User satisfaction and interaction with automated dynamic facades: A pilot study

Building and Environment

Volumn 78, Issue , 2014, Pages 44-52

  Bakker, L G ^a   Hoes van Oeffelen, E C M ^a   Loonen, R C G M ^b   Hensen, J L M ^b  

^a TNO   (Netherlands)

^b EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Automated control; Dynamic facade; Human factors; Occupant satisfaction; Personal control

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; AUTOMATION; ENERGY UTILIZATION; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; RISK ASSESSMENT;

AUTOMATED CONTROL; BUILDING ENERGY CONSUMPTION; DISCRETE TRANSITIONS; HIGH-PERFORMANCE OPERATION; INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY; OCCUPANT SATISFACTION; PERSONAL CONTROL; VISUAL PERFORMANCE;

FACADES;

AUTOMATION; BUILDING; CONTROL SYSTEM; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY;

EID: 84899830699     PISSN: 03601323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.04.007     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. IEA ECBCS Annex 44 integrating environmentally responsive elements in buildings - expert guide part 1: responsive building concepts 2009, P. Heiselberg (Ed.).
2. Loonen R.C.G.M., Trčka M., Hensen J.L.M. Exploring the potential of climate adaptive building shells. Proc Build Simul. 2011, Sydney, Australia 2011, 2148-2155.
3. Davies M. Awall for all seasons. RIBA J 1981, 88:55-57.
4. Wigginton M., Harris J. Intelligent skins 2002, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
5. Schumacher M., Schaeffer O., Vogt M. Move: architecture in motion - dynamic components and elements 2010, Birkhäuser, Basel.
6. Knaack U. Facades - principles of construction 2007, Birkhäuser.
7. Loonen R.C.G.M., Trčka M., Cóstola D., Hensen J.L.M. Climate adaptive building shells: state-of-the-art and future challenges. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2013, 25:483-493.
8. Gyalistras D., Gwerder M., Oldewurtel F., Jones C., Morari M., Lehmann B., et al. Analysis of energy savings potentials for integrated room automation. Proc. 10th REHVA World Congr. Clima 2010.
9. Dounis A.I., Caraiscos C. Advanced control systems engineering for energy and comfort management in a building environment-a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2009, 13:1246-1261.
10. Cole R.J., Bild A., Matheus E. Automated and human intelligence: direct and indirect consequences. Intell Build Int 2012, 4:4-14.
11. Galasiu A.D., Veitch J.A. Occupant preferences and satisfaction with the luminous environment and control systems in daylit offices: a literature review. Energy Build 2006, 38:728-742.
12. Cole R.J., Brown Z. Reconciling human and automated intelligence in the provision of occupant comfort. Intell Build Int 2009, 1:39-55.
13. Paciuk M. The role of personal control of the environment in thermal comfort and satisfaction at the workplace. Proc. 21st Environ. Des. Res. Assoc. Meet. 1989.
14. Lee S.Y., Brand J.L. Effects of control over office workspace on perceptions of the work environment and work outcomes. JEnviron Psychol 2005, 25:323-333.
15. Boerstra A.C., Beuker T., Loomans M.G.L.C., Hensen J.L.M. Impact of available and perceived control on comfort and health in European offices. Archit Sci Rev 2013, 56:30-41.
16. Bluyssen P.M., Aries M., van Dommelen P. Comfort of workers in office buildings: the European HOPE project. Build Environ 2011, 46:280-288.
17. Bordass B., Bromley K., Leaman A. User and occupant controls in office buildings 1993.
18. Bordass B., Heasman T., Leaman A., Perry M. Daylight use in open-plan offices - the opportunities and the fantasies. CIBSE Light. Conf. Cambridge, March 1994 1994, 1-11.
19. Stevens S. Intelligent facades: occupant control and satisfaction. Int J Sustain Energy 2001, 21:147-160.
20. Vine E., Lee E.S., Clear R., DiBartolomeo D., Selkowitz S. Office worker response to an automated Venetian blind and electric lighting system: a pilot study. Energy Build 1998, 28:205-218.
21. Lee E.S., Dibartolomeo D.L. Application issues for large-area electrochromic windows in commercial buildings 2002, 71:465-491.
22. Velds M. User acceptance studies to evaluate discomfort glare in daylit rooms. Solar 2002, 73:95-103.
23. O'Brien W., Kapsis K., Athienitis A.K. Manually-operated window shade patterns in office buildings: a critical review. Build Environ 2013, 60:319-338.
24. Reinhart C., Voss K. Monitoring manual control of electric lighting and blinds. Light Res Technol 2003, 35:243-260.
25. Lee E.S., Fernandes L.L., Coffey B., Mcneil A., Clear R., Webster T., et al. Apost-occupancy monitored evaluation of the dimmable lighting, automated shading, and underfloor air distribution system in the New York times building 2013, Report: LBNL-6023E.
26. Clear R.D., Inkarojrit V., Lee E.S. Subject responses to electrochromic windows. Energy Build 2006, 38:758-779.
27. Lee E.S., Claybaugh E.S., LaFrance M. End user impacts of automated electrochromic windows in a pilot retrofit application. Energy Build 2012, 47:267-284.
28. Banbury S.P., Berry D.C. Office noise and employee concentration: identifying causes of disruption and potential improvements. Ergonomics 2005, 48:25-37.
29. Lee S.Y., Brand J.L. Can personal control over the physical environment ease distractions in office workplaces?. Ergonomics 2010, 53:324-335.
30. Tzempelikos A., Shen H. Comparative control strategies for roller shades with respect to daylighting and energy performance. Build Environ 2013, 67:179-192.
31. Yao J. An investigation into the impact of movable solar shades on energy, indoor thermal and visual comfort improvements. Build Environ 2014, 71:24-32.