Alternatives to lecture: Experience peer instruction and pedagogical code reviews

SIGCSE 2014 - Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 275-276

  Grissom, Scott ^a   Hundhausen, Christopher ^b   Conrad, Phillip ^c  

^a GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Active learning; Collaborative learning; Evidence based instructional practices; Pedagogical code reviews; Peer instruction; Student engagement pedagogies; Student centered learning

Indexed keywords

STUDENTS;

ACTIVE LEARNING; CODE REVIEW; COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICES; PEER INSTRUCTION; STUDENT ENGAGEMENT; STUDENT-CENTERED LEARNING;

TEACHING;

EID: 84899743356     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2538862.2538985     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Beck, Leland. 2011. personal communication.
2. Carl Wieman Science Education Initiative, Clicker Resource Website. http://cwsei.ubc.ca/resources/clickers.htm.
3. Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. 2001. Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69.
4. Gilb, T. and Graham, D. Software Inspection . Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, CA, 1993.
5. Hake, R. R. 1998. Interactive-engagement vs. traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics. 66 (1).
6. Henderson, C., & Dancy, M.H. 2009. "The Impact of Physics Education Research on the Teaching of Introductory Quantitative Physics, " Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference.
7. Hundhausen, C.D., Agrawal, A. and Agarwal, P. 2013. Talking about code: Integrating pedagogical code reviews into early computing courses. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 13, 3 (Aug. 2013), 14:1-14:28.
8. Hundhausen, C.D., Narayanan, N.H. and Crosby, M.E. 2008. Exploring studio-based instructional models for computing education. Proc. 39th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education . ACM Press. 392-396.
9. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., and Smith, K. A. 1991. Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom, Interaction Book Company, Edina, MN.
10. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation . Cambridge University Press, New York.
11. Michael, J. 2006. "Where's the Evidence that Active Learning Works?" Advances in Physiology Education, 30, pp. 159-167.
12. Porter, L., Bailey-Lee, C., Simon, B, Zingaro, D. 2011. Peer Instruction: Do Students Really Learn from Peer Discussion in Computing? ICER 2011.
13. Simon, B. Kohanfars, M., Lee, J. Tamayo, K. and Cutts, Q. 2010. "Experience report: peer instruction in introductory computing". Proceedings of SIGCSE 2009 .
14. Slavin, R. E. 1995. Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice (2nd edition), Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA.
15. Trustees of Indiana University. 2011. Faculty Survey of Student Engagement, .
16. Wiegers, K. 1995. Improving quality with software inspections. Software Development. 3, 4 (1995), 55-64.