Intimate partner violence against women and victim-blaming attitudes among Europeans

Bulletin of the World Health Organization

Volumn 92, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 380-381

  Gracia, Enrique ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AWARENESS; EDUCATION; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MENTAL HEALTH; NOTE; PARTNER VIOLENCE; PUBLIC HEALTH; VICTIM; ATTITUDE; BATTERED WOMAN; CRIME VICTIM; EUROPE; FEMALE; HUMAN RELATION; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGY; SEXUALITY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; VIOLENCE;

ATTITUDE; BATTERED WOMEN; CRIME VICTIMS; EUROPE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; SEXUAL PARTNERS; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; SPOUSE ABUSE; VIOLENCE;

EID: 84899723655     PISSN: 00429686     EISSN: 15640604     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2471/BLT.13.131391     Document Type: Note

References (12)

1. Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.
2. Gracia E, Herrero J. Acceptability of domestic violence against women in the European Union: a multilevel analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health 2006; 60: 123-9. doi: http://dx. doi. org/10. 1136/jech. 2005. 036533.
3. Flood M, Pease B. Factors influencing attitudes to violence against women. Trauma Violence Abuse 2009; 10: 125-42. doi: http://dx. doi. org/10. 1177/1524838009334131.
4. Waltermaurer E. Public justification of intimate partner violence: a review of the literature. Trauma Violence Abuse 2012; 13: 167-75. doi: http://dx. doi. org/10. 1177/1524838012447699.
5. European Commission. Domestic violence against women report. Brussels: Directorate-General for Justice; 2010. Available from: http://ec. europa. eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_344_en. pdf [accessed 1 February 2014].
6. Kogut T. Someone to blame: when identifying a victim decreases helping. J Exp Soc Psychol 2011; 47: 748-55. doi: http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. jesp. 2011. 02. 011.
7. Gracia E, García F, Lila M. Public responses to intimate partner violence against women: the influence of perceived severity and personal responsibility. Span J Psychol 2009; 12: 648-56. doi: http://dx. doi. org/10. 1017/S1138741600002018.
8. Taylor CA, Sorenson SB. Community-based norms about intimate partner violence: putting attributions of fault and responsibility into context. Sex Roles 2005; 53: 573-89. doi: http://dx. doi. org/10. 1007/s11199-005-7143-7.
9. Gracia E. Unreported cases of domestic violence against women: Towards an epidemiology of social silence, tolerance, and inhibition. J Epidemiol Community Health 2004; 58: 536-7. doi: http://dx. doi. org/10. 1136/jech. 2003. 019604.
10. Gracia E, García F, Lila M. Police attitudes toward policing partner violence against women: Do they correspond to different psychosocial profiles? J Interpers Violence 2011; 26: 189-207. doi: http://dx. doi. org/10. 1177/0886260510362892.
11. Gracia E, López-Quílez A, Marco M, Lladosa S, Lila M. Exploring neighborhood influences on small-area variations in intimate partner violence risk: a Bayesian random-effects modeling approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2014; 11: 866-82. doi: http://dx. doi. org/10. 3390/ijerph110100866.
12. Merlo J. Contextual influences on the individual life course: building a research framework for social epidemiology. Psychosoc Interv 2011; 20: 111-21.