How do firms perceive policy rationales behind the variety of instruments supporting collaborative R&D? Lessons from the European Framework Programs

Technovation

Volumn 34, Issue 5-6, 2014, Pages 327-337

  Bach, Laurent ^a   Matt, Mireille ^b   Wolff, Sandrine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

^b INRA University Pierre Mendes France   (France)

Author keywords

Innovation failures; Innovation strategy; Policy instruments; Technology policy

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRY; INNOVATION; MOTIVATION; SURVEYS;

FRAMEWORK PROGRAM; INNOVATION PROCESS; INNOVATION STRATEGY; POLICY INSTRUMENTS; POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS; PROJECT PARTICIPANTS; SYSTEMIC FAILURE; TECHNOLOGY POLICY;

INSTRUMENTS;

EID: 84899722046     PISSN: 01664972     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2014.02.008     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. P. Aghion, A. Paul, P. David, and D. Foray Science, technology and innovation for economic growth: linking policy research and practice in 'STIG Systems' Res. Policy 38 4 2009 571 694
2. F. Amesse, and P. Cohendet Technology transfer revisited from the perspective of the knowledge-based economy Res. Policy 30 2001 1459 1478
3. K.J. Arrow Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention, the Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity 1962 Princeton University Press Princeton 609 625.
4. L. Bach, and M. Matt From economic foundations to S&T policy tools: a comparative analysis of the dominant paradigms M. Matt, P. Llerena, In Innovation Policy in a Knowledge Based Economy: Theories and Practice 2005 Springer Verlag Berlin, Heidelbergh
5. L. Bach, M.J. Ledoux, M. Matt, and V. Schaeffer Evaluation of the economic effects of Brite-Euram programmes on the European Industry Scientometrics 34 3 1995 325 349
6. M. Bleda, and P. del Rio The market failure and systemic rationales in technological innovation systems Res. Policy 42 2013 1039 1052
7. S. Borrás, and C. Edquist The choice of innovation policy instruments Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 80 2013 1513 1522
8. S. Box OECD Work on Innovation - A Stocktaking of Existing Work STI Working Paper 2009 OECD Paris.
9. B. Bozeman, and J.S. Dietz Strategic research partnerships: constructing policy-relevant indicators J. Technol. Transf. 26 2001 385 393
10. A. Bureth, S. Wolff, and A. Zanfei The two faces of learning by cooperating. The evolution and stability of inter-firm agreements in the European electronics industry J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 32 4 1997 519 538
11. C. Chaminade, and C. Edquist Rationales for public policy intervention in the innovation process: a systems of innovation approach S. Kuhlmann, P. Shapira, R. Smits, The Theory and Practice of Innovation Policy. An International Research Handbook 2010 Edward Elgar Cheltenham, UK
12. W.M. Cohen, and D.A. Levinthal Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation Adm. Sci. Q. 35 1 1990 128 152
13. F. Corvers, H. Delanghe, U. Muldur, and J. Potocnik A New Deal for an Effective European Research Policy: The Design and Impacts of the 7th Framework Programme 2007 Springer Dordrecht
14. R.M. Cyert, and J.G. March A Behavioral Theory of the Firm 1963 Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
15. C. D'Aspremont, and A. Jacquemin Cooperative and non-cooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers Am. Econ. Rev. 78 1988 1133 1137
16. P.A. David, B.H. Hall, and A.A. Toole Is public R&D a complement or a substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence Res. Policy 29 2000 497 530
17. M. Dodgson, A. Hughes, J. Foster, and S. Metcalfe Systems thinking, market failure, and the development of innovation policy: the case of Australia Res. Policy 40 2011 1145 1156
18. G. Dosi Technological paradigms and technological trajectories Res. Policy 11 3 1982 147 162
19. EC. 2010a. Impact Assessment of the Participation of SMEs in the 'themes' of FP5 and FP6, 2009. Report for Directorate-General for Research 2010 FP7 Capacities - Research for the benefit of SMEs. EUR 2448EN Studies and Reports, Brussels.
20. EC. 2010b. Interim Evaluation of the Seventh Framework Programme. Report of the Expert Group Final Report. Brussels, 12 November.
21. EC. 2011a. Impact Assessment Accompanying the Communication from the Commission Horizon 2020 - The Framework Programme for Research and Innovation - Annexes. Commission Staff Working Paper. Brussels, 30 November.
22. EC. 2011b. On the Response to the Report of the Expert Group on the Interim Evaluation of the Seventh Framework Programme for Research. Technological Development and Demonstration Activities and to the Report of the Expert Group on the Interim Evaluation of the Risk - Sharing Finance Facility. COM (2011) 52 final, Brussels, 9 February.
23. R. Fisher, W. Polt, and N. Vonortas The Impact of Publicly Funded Research on Innovation: An Analysis of European Framework Programmes for Research and Development, PRO INNO Europe Paper No. 7 2009 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities Luxembourg
24. K. Flanagan, E. Uyarra, and M. Laranja Reconceptualising the 'policy mix' for innovation Res. Policy 40 2011 702 713
25. B.H. Hall, and J. Lerner financing of R&D and innovation B.H. Hall, N. Rosenberg, Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, vol. 1 (chap. 14) 2010 Elsevier, Amsterdam The Netherlands pp. 609-639.
26. P. Hanel, and M. St-Pierre Industry-university collaboration by Canadian manufacturing firms J. Technol. Transf. 31 4 2006 485 499
27. Hölzl, W.; Janger, J.; 2012. Innovation Barriers across Firms and Countries. WIFO Working Papers. No. 426 April.
28. M. Kapsali How to implement innovation policies through projects successfully Technovation 31 2011 615 626
29. M.J. Katz, and J.A. Ordover R&D cooperation and competition Brook. Papers Econ. Act.: Microecon. 1990 137 203.
30. Y.S. Lee The sustainability of university-industry research collaboration: An empirical assessment J. Technol. Transf. 25 2 2000 111 133
31. B.-Å. Lundvall, and S. Borrás The globalising learning economy: Implications for innovation policy, EUR 18307EN 1997 TSER/Science, Research and Development/EC Luxembourg.
32. B.-A. Lundvall National Innovation Systems - analytical concept and development tool Ind. Innov. 14 1 2007 95 119
33. B.-Å. Lundvall, and S. Borrás Science, technology, innovation and knowledge policy J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, R.R. Nelson, The Oxford Handbook of Innovation 2005 Oxford University Press Norfolk 599 631
34. T. Luukkonen Technology and market orientation in company participation in the EU framework programme Res. Policy 31 2002 437 455
35. Malerba, F.; 1996. Public policy and industrial dynamics: an evolutionary perspective. In: Research Project Final Report on Innovation Systems and European Integration (ISE). Funded by the TSER/4th FP, DG XII/EC (contract SOE1-CT95-1004, DG XII SOLS).
36. J.G. March Exploration vs. exploitation in organizational learning Organ. Sci. 2 1 1991 71 87
37. E. Magro, and J.R. Wilson Complex innovation policy systems: towards an evaluation mix Res. Policy 42 9 2013 1647 1656
38. M. Matt, and S. Wolff Incentives, coordination and learning in government-sponsored versus spontaneous inter-firm research cooperation Int. J. Technol. Manag. 27 8 2004 694 711
39. M. Matt, S. Robin, and S. Wolff The influence of public programs on inter-firm R&D collaboration strategies: project-level evidence from EU FP5 and FP6 J. Technol. Transf. 37 2012 885 916
40. J.S. Metcalfe, and L. Georghiou Equilibrium and evolutionary foundations of technology policy OECD STI Rev. 22 1998 75 100
41. Nauwelaers, C.; Boekholt, P.; Mostert, B.; Cunningham, P.; Guy, K.; Hofer, R.; Rammer, C.; 2009. Policy Mixes for R&D Europe. E.C.-Directorate-General. UNU-Merit.
42. R.R. Nelson The simple economics of basic scientific research J. Polit. Econ. 67 1959 323 348
43. R.R. Nelson Co-evolution of industry structure, technology and supporting institutions, and the making of comparative advantage Int. J. Econ. Bus. 2 2 1995 171 184
44. R.R. Nelson Building effective innovation systems versus dealing with market failures as ways of thinking about technology policy D. Foray, The New Economics of Technology Policy 2009 Edward Elgar Publishing Cheltenham.
45. C.K. Prahalad, and G. Hamel The core competence of the corporation Harv. Bus. Rev. 68 1990 79 91
46. A. Rabah Modelling imperfectly appropriable R&D via spillovers Int. J. Ind. Organ. 18 7 2000 1013 1032
47. G.B. Richardson The organization of industry Econ. J. 82 1972 883 896
48. Rossi F. 2007 Innovation policy in the European Union: instruments and objectives. Online at: 〈http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/2009/〉. MPRA Paper no. 2009. Posted 07 November 2007.
49. A. Rosiello, M. Mastroeni, M. Teubal, and G. Avnimelech Evolutionary policy targeting: towards a conceptual framework for effective policy intervention Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 25 7 2013 753 772
50. F.T. Rothaermel, and D.L. Deeds Exploration and expoitation alliances in biotechnology: a system of new product development Strateg. Manag. J. 25 2004 201 221
51. R. Rothwell Issues in user-producer relations in the innovation process: the role of government Int. J. Technol. Manag. 9 5/6/7 1994 629 649
52. M. Sakakibara Knowledge sharing in cooperative research and development Manag. Decis. Econ. 24 2003 117 132
53. M. Schwartz, F. Peglow, M. Fritsch, and J. Gunther What drives innovation output from subsidized R&D cooperation? Project-level evidence from Germany Technovation 32 2012 358 369
54. L. Soete, B. Verspagen, and B.T. Weel innovation B.H. Hall, N. Rosenberg, Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, vol. 2 (chap. 27) 2010 North Holland Amsterdam pp. 1159-1180.
55. Y.E. Spanos, and N.S. Vonortas Scale and performance in publicly funded collaborative research and development R&D Manag. 42 5 2012 494 513
56. W.E. Steinmueller Economics of technology policy B.H. Hall, N. Rosenberg, Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, vol. 2 (chap. 28) 2010 North Holland, Amsterdam The Netherlands pp. 1181-1218.
57. D.J. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy Res. Policy 15 1986 285 305
58. K.M. Weber, and H. Rohracher Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change. Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspectives in a comprehensive 'failures' framework Res. Policy 41 2012 1037 1047
59. R. Woolthuis, M. Lankhuizen, and V. Gilsing A system failure framework for innovation policy design Technovation 25 2005 609 619