BI-RADS Update

Radiologic Clinics of North America

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 481-487

  Mercado, Cecilia L ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

BI RADS; BI RADS atlas; Breast; Breast imaging; Lexicon

Indexed keywords

BREAST; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CANCER; BREAST IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM; BREAST LESION; CANCER SCREENING; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CYST ASPIRATION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; STANDARDIZATION;

BI-RADS; BI-RADS ATLAS; BREAST; BREAST IMAGING; LEXICON;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC;

EID: 84899685063     PISSN: 00338389     EISSN: 15578275     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2014.02.008     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. D'Orsi C.J., Mendelson E.B., Ikeda D.M., et al. Breast imaging reporting and data system: ACR BI-RADS - breast imaging atlas 2003, American College of Radiology, Reston (VA).
2. Destaunis SV, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, etal. BI-RADS Update and challenge (an interactive session). Refresher Course the 99th Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America, RSNA. Chicago, December 4, 2013.
3. Hansen B. Inside the New BI-RADS. ACR Bulletin 2011, 66(6):22.
4. Torres-Tabanera M., Cárdenas-Rebollo J.M., Villar-Castaño P., et al. Analysis of the positive predictive value of the subcategories of BI-RADS(®) 4 lesions: preliminary results in 880 lesions. Radiologia 2012, 54(6):520-531.
5. Edwards S.D., Lipson J.A., Ikeda D.M., et al. Updates and revisions to the BI-RADS magnetic resonance imaging lexicon. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2013, 21:483-493.
6. Available at: Accessed December 27, 2012. http://www.auntminnieeurope.com/index.aspx?sec=sup%26sub=wom%26pag=dis%26ItemID=605318.
7. Uematsu T., Kasami M. High-spatial-resolution 3-T breast MRI of nonmasslike enhancement lesions: an analysis of their features as significant predictors of malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012, 198(5):1223-1230.
8. Tozaki M., Fukuda K. High-spatial-resolution MRI of non-masslike breast lesions: interpretation model based on BI-RADS MRI descriptors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006, 187(2):330-337.
9. Kuhl C.K., Klaschik S., Mielcarek P., et al. Do T2-weighted pulse sequences help with the differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions in dynamic breast MRI?. JMagn Reson Imaging 1999, 9:187-196.
10. Ballesio L., Savelli S., Angeletti M., et al. Breast MRI: are T2 IR sequences useful in the evaluation of breast lesions?. Eur J Radiol 2009, 71:96-101.
11. Carney P.A., Sickles E.A., Monsees B.S., et al. Identifying minimally acceptable interpretive performance criteria for screening mammography. Radiology 2010, 255(2):354-361.
12. Smith-Bindman R., Chu P.W., Miglioretti D.L., et al. Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom. JAMA 2003, 290(16):2129-2137.
13. Leung J.W., Sickles E.A. The probably benign assessment. Radiol Clin North Am 2007, 45(5):773-789. vi.
14. Gruber R., Jaromi S., Rudas M., et al. Histologic work-up of non-palpable breast lesions classified as probablybenign at initial mammography and/or ultrasound (BI-RADS category 3). Eur J Radiol 2013, 82(3):398-403.