The development of a multi-criteria decision analysis aid to help with contraceptive choices: My contraception tool

Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 96-101

  French, Rebecca S ^a   Cowan, Frances M ^b   Wellings, Kaye ^c   Dowie, Jack ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c CENTRE FOR SEXUAL HEALTH AND HIV AIDS RESEARCH   (Zimbabwe)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CONDOM; CONTRACEPTION; DECISION MAKING; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENT STERILIZATION; IRRITABILITY; MALE; MENSTRUATION; MY CONTRACEPTION TOOL; PILL; PREGNANCY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEXUALITY; SMOKING; TROPICAL MEDICINE; UNITED KINGDOM; WEIGHT GAIN; COOPERATION; DECISION THEORY; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; RESEARCH TECHNIQUES;

RESEARCH TECHNIQUES; SERVICE DELIVERY;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONTRACEPTION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY;

EID: 84899681680     PISSN: 14711893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jfprhc-2013-100699     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bajos N, Lamarche-Vadel A, Gilbert F, et al.; COCON Group. Contraception at the time of abortion: high risk time or high risk women? Hum Reprod 2006;21:2862-2867.
2. Schunmann C, Glasier A. Measuring pregnancy intention and its relationship with contraceptive use among women undergoing therapeutic abortion. Contraception 2006;73:520-524.
3. Bekker HL, Hewison J, Thornton JG. Understanding why decision aids work: linking process with outcome. Patient Educ Couns 2003;50:323-329. (Pubitemid 36945307)
4. Dolan JG. Multi-criteria clinical decision support. A primer on the use of multiple-criteria decision-making methods to promote evidence-based, patient-centered healthcare. Patient 2010;3:229-248.
5. Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;10:CD001431.
6. French RS, Wellings K, Cowan FM. How we can help people to choose a method of contraception? The case for contraception decision aids. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2009;35:219-220.
7. Edwards W. The theory of decision making. Psychol Bull 1954;51:380-411.
8. Gage AJ. Sexual activity and contraceptive use: the components of the decision making process. Stud Fam Plann 1998;29:154-166. (Pubitemid 28392989)
9. Annalisa©. http://www.annalisa.org.uk [accessed 16 May 2013].
10. Elicia©. http://www.maldaba.co.uk/products/elicia/ [accessed 16 May 2013].
11. Fenton KA, Korovessis C, Johnson AM, et al. Sexual behaviour in Britain: reported sexually transmitted infections and present genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Lancet 2001;358:1851-1854. (Pubitemid 34008651)
12. Faculty of Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare. UK Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use. 2009. http://www.fsrh.org/pdfs/UKMEC2009.pdf [accessed 16 May 2013].
13. Chin-Quee DS, Jaonwitz B, Otterness C. Counseling tools alone do not improve method of continuation: further evidence from the decision-making tool for family planning clients and providers in Nicaragua. Contraception 2007;76:377-382. (Pubitemid 47600124)
14. Kim YM, Kols A, Martin A, et al. Promoting informed choice: evaluation a decision-making tool for family planning clients and providers in Mexico. Int Fam Plan Perspect 2005;31:162-171. (Pubitemid 47028623)
15. Kim YM, Davila C, Tellez C, et al. Evaluation of the World Health Organization's family planning decision-making tool: improving health communication in Nicaragua. Patient Educ Couns 2007;66:235-242. (Pubitemid 46575180)
16. French RS, Dowie J. Using decision analysis to help young people with contraceptive choices. In: Baker P, Guthrie K, Hutchinson C (eds). Teenage Pregnancy. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2007:133-146.