Evaluation of the World Health Organization's family planning decision-making tool: Improving health communication in Nicaragua

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 66, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 235-242

  Kim, Young Mi ^a   Davila, Claudia ^b   Tellez, Carolina ^b   Kols, Adrienne ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b Centro para Programa de Comunicación   (Nicaragua)

Author keywords

Decision aid; Job aid; Patient physician communication; Reproductive health

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTRACEPTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FAMILY PLANNING; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NICARAGUA; NORMAL HUMAN; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; VERBAL COMMUNICATION; VIDEORECORDING; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COMMUNICATION; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; INSERVICE TRAINING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NICARAGUA; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUESTIONNAIRES; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

EID: 34147171155     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.12.007     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. EngenderHealth. Choices in family planning: informed and voluntary decision making. New York: EngenderHealth; 2003.
2. Upadhyay UD. Informed choice in family planning: helping people decide. Population Reports, Series J, No. 50. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Population Information Program; 2001.
3. World Health Organization (WHO). The world health report 2006: working together for health. Geneva: WHO; 2006 [available at: http://www.who.int/whr/2006/en/index.html].
4. Marquez L, Kean L. Making supervision supportive and sustainable: new approaches to old problems. MAQ Paper No. 4. Washington, DC: Maximizing Access and Quality (MAQ) Initiative; 2002 [available at: http://www.maqweb.org/maqdoc/].
5. Miller K., Jones H., and Horn M. Indicators of readiness and quality: basic findings. In: Miller K., Miller R., Askew I., Horn M.C., and Ndhlovu L. (Eds). Clinic-based family planning and reproductive health services in Africa: findings from situation analysis studies (1998), Population Council, New York 31-85
6. Kim Y.M., Kols A., Bonnin C., Richardson P., and Roter D. Client communication behaviors with health care providers in Indonesia. Patient Educ Couns 45 (2001) 59-68
7. Kirimlioglu N., Elcioglu O., and Yildiz Z. Client participation and provider communication in family planning counselling and the sample study from Turkey. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 10 (2005) 131-141
8. Rudy S, Tabbutt-Henry J, Schaefer L, McQuide P. Improving client-provider interaction. Population Reports, Series Q, No. 1. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, the INFO Project; 2003.
9. León F.R., Monge R., Zumerán A., García I., and Ríos A. Length of counseling sessions and the amount of relevant information exchanged: a study in Peruvian clinics. Int Fam Plann Perspect 27 (2001) 28-33 and 46
10. Murphy E, Steele C. Client-provider interactions in family planning services: Guidance from research and program experience. MAQ Paper No. 1. Washington, DC: Maximizing Access and Quality (MAQ) Initiative; 2000 [available at: http://www.maqweb.org/maqdoc/].
11. Kim Y.M., Kols A., and Mucheke S. Informed choice and decision-making in family planning counseling in Kenya. Int Fam Plann Perspect 30 (1998) 4-11 and 42
12. Peterson HB, Church K, Johnson S. Norms and guidelines for use of methods of fertility regulation. In: World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research. Annual technical report 2003. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004. p. 67-72.
13. World Health Organization (WHO) Department of Reproductive Health and Research (RHR), and the INFO Project at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health/Center for Communication Programs (JHU/CCP). Decision-making tool for family planning clients and providers. Geneva and Baltimore: WHO and JHU/CCP; 2005 [available at: http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/family_planning/tool.html].
14. Kim Y.M., Kols A., Martin A., Silva D., Rinehart W., Prammawat S., Johnson S., and Church K. Promoting informed choice: evaluating a decision-making tool for family planning clients and providers in Mexico. Int Fam Plan Perspect 31 (2005) 162-171
15. Elwyn G., Edwards A., Wensing M., Hood K., Atwell C., and Grol R. Fleeting glimpses of shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement. Qual Safe Health Care 12 (2002) 93-99
16. Kim Y.M., Kols A., Putjuk F., Heerey M., Rinehart W., Elwyn G., and Edwards A. Participation by clients and nurse-midwives in family planning decision making in Indonesia. Patient Educ Couns 50 (2003) 295-302
17. Roter D.L., and Hall J.A. Doctors talking to patients/patients talking to doctors: improving communication in medical visits (1992), Auburn House, Westport, CT
18. Rinehart W, Johnson S, Rudy S. A normative model of client-provider communication for family planning decision-making. August 28, 2002. Unpublished, 4 pp.
19. Vadnais D, Kols A, Abderrahim N. Women's lives and experiences: changes in the past ten years. Calverton, Maryland: ORC Macro; 2006 [available at: http://www.measuredhs.com/pubs/pdf/OD40/OD40.pdf].
20. Knebel E. The use of manual job aids by health care providers: what do we know? Operations Research Issue Paper 1(1). Bethesda, Maryland: Quality Assurance Project; 2000 [available at: http://www.qaproject.org/pubs/pubsissuepapers.html].
21. O'Connor AM, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Flood AB. Modifying unwarranted variations in health care: shared decision making using patient decision aids. Health Affairs Web Exclusive, October 7, 2004: VAR 63-VAR 72 [available at: http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/abstract/hlthaff.var.63v1].