Dopamine composite nanofiltration membranes prepared by self-polymerization and interfacial polymerization

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 465, Issue , 2014, Pages 41-48

  Zhao, Jiaojiao ^a,b   Su, Yanlei ^a,b   He, Xin ^a   Zhao, Xueting ^a,b   Li, Yafei ^a,b   Zhang, Runnan ^a,b   Jiang, Zhongyi ^a,b  

^a TIANJIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b SynBio Research Platform   (China)

Author keywords

Composite nanofiltration membranes; Dopamine; Interfacial polymerization; Self polymerization

Indexed keywords

AMINES; CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; FILM PREPARATION; FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; PHENOLS; PHOTOELECTRONS; POLYMERIZATION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STABILITY; THIN FILMS; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

COMPOSITE NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANE; DOPAMINE; INTERFACIAL POLYMERIZATION; SELF-POLYMERIZATION; SEPARATION PERFORMANCE; SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTION; STRUCTURAL STABILITIES; WATER CONTACT ANGLE MEASUREMENT;

COMPOSITE MEMBRANES;

ALCOHOL; AMINE; CATECHOL; CHLORIDE; DOPAMINE; HYPOCHLORITE SODIUM; MONOMER; PHENOL; TRIMESOYL CHLORIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; WATER;

ADHESION; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL INTERACTION; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTACT ANGLE; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; INTERFACIAL POLYMERIZATION; MOLECULAR STABILITY; NANOFILTRATION; PH; POLYMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SELF POLYMERIZATION; TEMPERATURE; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

EID: 84899674323     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.04.018     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Hilal N., Al-Zoubi H., Darwish N., Mohamma A., Abu Arabi M. A comprehensive review of nanofiltration membranes: treatment, pretreatment, modelling, and atomic force microscopy. Desalination 2004, 170:281-308.
2. Zhao C., Xue J., Ran F., Sun S. Modification of polyethersulfone membranes - a review of methods. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2013, 58:76-150.
3. Nataraj S., Hosamani K., Aminabhavi T. Nanofiltration and reverse osmosis thin film composite membrane module for the removal of dye and salts from the simulated mixtures. Desalination 2009, 249:12-17.
4. Hussain A., Nataraj S., Abashar M., Al-Mutaz I., Aminabhavi T. Prediction of physical properties of nanofiltration membranes using experiment and theoretical models. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 310:321-336.
5. Kotrappanavar N.S., Hussain A., Abashar M., Al-Mutaz I.S., Aminabhavi T.M., Nadagouda M.N. Prediction of physical properties of nanofiltration membranes for neutral and charged solutes. Desalination 2011, 280:174-182.
6. Harisha R., Hosamani K., Keri R., Nataraj S., Aminabhavi T. Arsenic removal from drinking water using thin film composite nanofiltration membrane. Desalination 2010, 252:75-80.
7. Freger V. Nanoscale heterogeneity of polyamide membranes formed by interfacial polymerization. Langmuir 2003, 19:4791-4797.
8. Oh N.W., Jegal J., Lee K.H. Preparation and characterization of nanofiltration composite membranes using polyacrylonitrile (PAN). II. Preparation and characterization of polyamide composite membranes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2001, 80:2729-2736.
9. Peng J.M., Su Y.L., Chen W.J., Zhao X.T., Jiang Z.Y., Dong Y.N., Zhang Y., Liu J.Z., Cao X.Z. Polyamide nanofiltration membrane with high separation performance prepared by EDC/NHS mediated interfacial polymerization. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 427:92-100.
10. Li B., Liu W., Jiang Z., Dong X., Wang B., Zhong Y. Ultrathin and stable active layer of dense composite membrane enabled by poly (dopamine). Langmuir 2009, 25:7368-7374.
11. Yu L.N., Zhao J., Li X., Yang Y., Wang X.F. Bioenabled interfacial polymerized on nanofibrous scaffold as composite nanofiltration membrane. Adv. Mater. Res. 2012, 482:565-568.
12. Lee H., Dellatore S.M., Miller W.M., Messersmith P.B. Mussel-inspired surface chemistry for multifunctional coatings. Science 2007, 318:426-430.
13. Xi Z.Y., Xu Y.Y., Zhu L.P., Wang Y., Zhu B.K. A facile method of surface modification for hydrophobic polymer membranes based on the adhesive behavior of poly (DOPA) and poly (dopamine). J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 327:244-253.
14. Li X.L., Jiang J.H., Yi Z., Zhu B.K., Xu Y.Y. Hydrophilic nanofiltration membranes with self-polymerized and strongly-adhered polydopamine as separating layer. Chin. J. Polym. Sci. 2012, 30:152-163.
15. Zangmeister R.A., Morris T.A., Tarlov M.J. Characterization of polydopamine thin films deposited at short times by autoxidation of dopamine. Langmuir 2013, 29:8619-8628.
16. Hong S., Na Y.S., Choi S., Song I.T., Kim W.Y., Lee H. Non-covalent self-assembly and covalent polymerization co-contribute to polydopamine formation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22:4711-4717.
17. Zhao W., Su Y.L., Li C., Shi Q., Ning X., Jiang Z.Y. Fabrication of antifouling polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes using Pluronic F127 as both surface modifier and pore-forming agent. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 318:405-412.
18. Wang Y.Q., Wang T., Su Y.L., Peng F.B., Wu H., Jiang Z.Y. Remarkable reduction of irreversible fouling and improvement of the permeation properties of poly (ether sulfone) ultrafiltration membranes by blending with pluronic F127. Langmuir 2005, 21:11856-11862.
19. Akin O., Temelli F. Probing the hydrophobicity of commercial reverse osmosis membranes produced by interfacial polymerization using contact angle, XPS, FTIR, FE-SEM and AFM. Desalination 2011, 278:387-396.
20. Huang S.H., Hsu C.J., Liaw D.J., Hu C.C., Lee K.R., Lai J.Y. Effect of chemical structures of amines on physicochemical properties of active layers and dehydration of isopropanol through interfacially polymerized thin-film composite membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 307:73-81.
21. Lee K.P., Arnot T.C., Mattia D. A review of reverse osmosis membrane materials for desalination-development to date and future potential. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 370:1-22.
22. Kasemset S., Lee A., Miller D.J., Freeman B.D., Sharma M.M. Effect of polydopamine deposition conditions on fouling resistance, physical properties, and permeation properties of reverse osmosis membranes in oil/water separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 425:208-216.
23. Darvishmanesh S., Degrève J., Van der Bruggen B. Mechanisms of solute rejection in solvent resistant nanofiltration: the effect of solvent on solute rejection. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12:13333-13342.
24. Peyravi M., Rahimpour A., Jahanshahi M. Thin film composite membranes with modified polysulfone supports for organic solvent nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 423:225-237.
25. Karan S., Samitsu S., Peng X., Kurashima K., Ichinose I. Ultrafast viscous permeation of organic solvents through diamond-like carbon nanosheets. Science 2012, 335:444-447.
26. Vandezande P., Gevers L.E., Vankelecom I.F. Solvent resistant nanofiltration: separating on a molecular level. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37:365-405.
27. Zhao Y.Y., Yuan Q.P. A comparison of nanofiltration with aqueous and organic solvents. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 279:453-458.
28. Yang X., Livingston A., Freitas dos Santos L. Experimental observations of nanofiltration with organic solvents. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 190:45-55.
29. Zhang Y., Su Y.L., Peng J.M., Zhao X.T., Liu J.Z., Zhao J.J., Jiang Z.Y. Composite nanofiltration membranes prepared by interfacial polymerization with natural material tannic acid and trimesoyl chloride. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 429:235-242.