Prediction of physical properties of nanofiltration membranes for neutral and charged solutes

Desalination

Volumn 280, Issue 1-3, 2011, Pages 174-182

  Kotrappanavar, Nataraj S ^a   Hussain, A A ^b   Abashar, M E E ^c   Al Mutaz, Ibrahim S ^c   Aminabhavi, Tejraj M ^d   Nadagouda, Mallikarjuna N ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b Qatar Science and Technology Park   (Qatar)

^c KING SAUD UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

^d KARNATAK UNIVERSITY   (India)

^e U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

MgCl2; NaCl; Nanofiltration; NF 250; NF 300; Rejection rates

Indexed keywords

MGCL2; NACL; NF 250; NF 300; REJECTION RATES;

CHARGE DENSITY; GLUCOSE; MAGNESIUM; NANOFILTRATION; PH EFFECTS; SODIUM; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES;

ESTIMATION METHOD; FILTRATION; GLUCOSE; MAGNESIUM; MEMBRANE; PERMEABILITY; PH; PREDICTION; SODIUM CHLORIDE; SOLUTE;

EID: 80053309536     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.07.007     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Du R., Zhao J. Positively charged composite nanofiltration membrane prepared by poly(N, N-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate)/polysulfone. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2004, 91:2721-2728.
2. Wang X.L., Tsuru T., Nakao S., Kimura S. Electrolyte transport through nanofiltration membranes by the space-charge model and the comparison with Teorell-Meyer-Sievers model. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 103:117-133.
3. Richard Bowen W., Wahab Mohammad A., Hilal N. Characterisation of nanofiltration membranes for predictive purposes - use of salts, uncharged solutes and atomic force microscopy. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 126:91-105.
4. Schaep J., Vandecasteele C. Evaluating the charge of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 188:129-136.
5. Van der Bruggen B., Vandecasteele C. Modelling of the retention of uncharged molecules with nanofiltration. Water Res. 2002, 36:1360-1368.
6. Raman L.P., Cheryan M., Rajagopalan N. Consider nanofiltration for membrane separations. Chem. Eng. Prog. 1994, 3:68-74.
7. Silva V., Martin A., Martinez F., Malfeito J., Pradanos P., Palacio L., Hernandez A. Electrical characterization of NF membranes. A modified model with charge variation along the pores. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2011, 66:2898-2911.
8. Benavente J., Silva V., Pradanos P., Palacio L., Hernandez A., Jonson G. Comparison of the volume charge density of nanofiltration membranes obtained from retention and conductivity experiments. Langmuir 2010, 26:11841-11849.
9. Pontie M., Diawara C., Lhassani A., Dach H., Rumeau M., Buisson H., Schrotter J.C. Chapter 2 water defluoridation processes: a review. application: nanofiltration (NF) for future large-scale pilot plants. In. Adv. Fluorine Sci. 2006, 2:49-80.
10. Pontie M., Lhassani A., Diawara C.K., Elana A., Innocent C., Aureau D., Rumeau M., Croue J.P., Buisson H., Hemery P. Seawater nanofiltration for the elaboration of usable salty waters. Desalination 2004, 167:347-355.
11. Walha K., Ama R.B., Bourseau P., Jaouen P. Nanofiltration of concentrated and salted tuna cooking juices. Process. Saf. Environ. Prot. 2009, 87:331-335.
12. Bourseau P., Vandanjon L., Jaouen P., Chaplain-Derouiniot M., Masse A., Guerard F., Chabeaud A., Fouchereau-Peron M., LeGal Y., Ravallec-Ple R., Berge J.P., Picot L., Piot J.M., Batista I., Thorkelsson G., Delannoy C., Jakobsen G., Johansson I. Fractionation of fish protein hydrolysates by ultrafiltration and nanofiltration: impact on peptidic populations. Desalination 2009, 244:303-320.
13. Van der Bruggen B., Vandecasteele C. Removal of pollutants from surface water and groundwater by nanofiltration: overview of possible applications in the drinking water industry. Environ. Pollut. 2003, 122:435-445.
14. White L.S. Development of large-scale applications in organic solvent nanofiltration and pervaporation for chemical and refining processes. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 286:26-35.
15. Bowen W.R., Cassey B., Jones P., Oatley D.L. Modelling the performance of membrane nanofiltration - application to an industrially relevant separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 242:211-220.
16. Zhu A., Zhu W., Wu Z., Jing Y. Recovery of clindamycin from fermentation wastewater with nanofiltration membranes. Water Res. 2003, 37:3718-3732.
17. Oatley D.L., Cassey B., Jones P., Bowen W.R. Modeling the performance of membrane nanofiltration - recovery of a high-value product from a process waste stream. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2005, 60:1953-1964.
18. Wang K.Y., Chung T.S. The characterization of flat composite nanofiltration membranes and their applications in the separation of cephalexin. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 247:37-50.
19. Lanteri Y., Fieveta P., Szymczyk A. Assessment of dielectric contribution in the modeling of multi-ionic transport through nanofiltration membranes. J Colloid Interface Sci 2009, 331:148-155.
20. Déona S., Dutourniéb P., Limousyb L., Bourseaub P. Transport of salt mixtures through nanofiltration membranes: numerical identification of electric and dielectric contributions. Sep Purif Techn 2009, 69:225-233.
21. Hussain A.A., Nataraj S.K., Abashar M.E.E., Al-Mutaz I.S., Aminabhavi T.M. Prediction of physical properties of nanofiltration membranes using experiment and theoretical models. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 310:321-336.
22. Hassan A.M., Al-Sofi M.A.K., Al-Amoudi A.S., Jamaluddin A.T.M., Farooque A.M., Rowaili A., Dalvi A.G.I., Kither N.M., Mustafa G.M., Al-Tisan I.A.R. A new approach to membrane and thermal seawater desalination processes using nanofiltration membranes (Part 1). Desalination 1998, 118:35-51.
23. Szymczyk A., Sbai M., Fievet P., Vidonne A. Transport properties and electrokinetic characterization of an amphoteric nanofilter. Langmuir 2006, 22:3910-3919.
24. Szymczyk A., Fatin-Rouge N., Fievet P., Ramseyer C., Vidonne A. Prediction of physical properties of nanofiltration membranes using experiment and theoretical models. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 287:102-110.
25. Hussain A.A., Abashar M.E.E., Al-Mutaz J.I.S. Effect of ions sizes on separation characteristics of nanofilteration membrane systems. J KSU Eng. Sci. 2006, 19:1-19.
26. Hussain A.A., Abashar M.E.E., Al-Mutaz I.S. Influence of ion size on the prediction of nanofiltration membrane systems. Desalination 2007, 214:150-166.
27. Hussain A.A., Abashar M.E.E., Al-Mutaz I.S. Prediction of charge density for desal-HL nanofiltration membrane from simulation and experiment using different ion radii. Sep. Sci. Techol. 2007, 42:43-57.
28. Lefebvre X., Palmeri J., David P. Nanofiltration theory: an analytic approach for single salts. J. Phys. Chem. 2004, B108:16811-16824.
29. Babu C.S., Lim C. A new interpretation of the effective Born radius from simulation and experiment. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1999, 310:225-228.
30. Zilberbrand M. A nonelectrical mechanism of ion exclusion in thin water films in finely dispersed media. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1997, 192:471-474.
31. Kiyosawa K. Volumetric properties of polyols (ethylene glycol, glycerol, meso-erythritol, xylitol and mannitol) in relation to their membrane permeability: group additivity and estimation of the maximum radius of their molecules. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1991, 1064:251-255.
32. Wang X.L., Tsuru T., Togoh M., Nakao S., Kimura S. Evaluation of pore structure and electrical properties of nanofiltration membranes. J. Chem. Eng. Japan 1995, 28:186-192.
33. Hunter R.J. Foundation of Colloid Science 2001, Oxford University Press, New York. 2nd Ed.
34. Labbez C., Fievet P., Szymczyk A., Vidonne A., Foissy A., Pagetti J. Analysis of the salt retention of a titania membrane using the "DSPM" model: effect of pH, salt concentration and nature. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 208:315-329.
35. Ariza M.J., Benavente J. Streaming potential along the surface of polysulfone membranes: a comparative study between two different experimental systems and determination of electrokinetic and adsorption parameters. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 190:119-132.
36. Hagmeyer G., Gimbel R. Modeling the salt rejection of nanofiltration membranes for ternary ion mixtures and for single salts at different pH values. Desalination 1998, 117:247-256.
37. Labbez C., Fievet P., Thomas F., Szymczyk A., Vidonne A., Foissy A., Pagetti P. Evaluation of the "DSPM" model on a titania membrane: measurements of charged and uncharged solute retention, electrokinetic charge, pore size, and water permeability. J. Colloid Interface Sci 2003, 262:200-211.
38. Teixeira M.R., Rosa M.J., Nyström M. The role of membrane charge on nanofiltration performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 265:160-166.
39. Senapati S., Chandra A. Dielectric constant of water confined in nanocavity. J Phys Chem B 2001, 105:5106-5109.
40. Ballenegger V., Hansen J.P. Dielectric permittivity profiles of confined polar fluids. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 122:114711-114721.
41. Bontha J.R., Pintauro P.N. Prediction of ion solvation free energies in a polarizable dielectric continuum. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96:7778-7782.
42. Senapati S., Chandra A. Molecular dynamics simulations of simple dipolar liquids in spherical cavity: Effects of confinement on structural, dielectric, and dynamical properties. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 111:1223-1231.
43. Tang Y.W., Chan K.-Y., Szalai I. Structural and transport properties of an SPC/E electrolyte in a nanopore. J. Phys. Chem. 2004, 108:18204-18213.
44. Aitkuliev K., Sobolev V.D., Churaev N.V. Influence of the flow rate and concentration of the electrolyte on the selectivity of reverse osmosis membranes. Colloid J USSR 1985, 47:179-184.