Complex assessment model for advanced technology deployment

Journal of Civil Engineering and Management

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 280-290

  Kildiene, Simona ^a   Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras ^a   Tamošaitiene, Jolanta ^a  

^a VILNIUS GEDIMINAS TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

AHP; development; implementation; MCDM; model; multi stage; permutation method; technology

Indexed keywords

CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; MODELS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

AHP; DEVELOPMENT; IMPLEMENTATION; MCDM; MULTI-STAGE; PERMUTATION METHOD;

TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84899670606     PISSN: 13923730     EISSN: 18223605     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3846/13923730.2014.904813     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Akadiri, P. O.; Olomolaiye, P. O.; Chinyio, E. A. 2013. Multicriteria evaluation model for the selection of sustainable materials for building projects, Automation in Construction 30: 113-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. autcon.2012.10.004
2. Bakar, K. A.; Sam, M. F. M.; Tahir, M. N. H.; Rajiani, I.; Muslan, N. 2011. Green technology readiness in Malaysia: sustainability for business development, in Proc. of The 2nd International Conference on Business and Economic Research (2nd Icber 2011), 14-16 March, 2011, Langkawi, Kedah, Malaysia, 1120-1129.
3. Blackley, D. M.; Shepard III, E. M. 1996. The diffusion of innovation in home building, Journal of Housing Economics http:/5/d(x4.)d: o3i0.o3r-g3/1202..1 006/jhec.1996.0016
4. Brauers, W. K. M.; KildienB, S.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Kaklauskas, A. 2012. The construction sector in twenty European countries during the recession 2008-2009-country ranking by MULTIMOORA, International Journal of Strategic Phtrtopp:/e/drtxy. dMoai.noargg/e1m0.e3n8t4 167/(116)4: 85781-57X8.. 2013.775194
5. Dunovic, I. B.; Radujkovic, M.; Vukomanovic, M. 2013. Risks rpergoijsetcetrs ,d evelopment and implementation for construction. Gradevinar 65(1): 23-35.
6. Cavico, F.; Mujtaba, B. G.; McClelland, B.; Williamson, P. 2013. A study of bribery and wealth in the ASEAN community, International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering 3(1): 576-597.
7. Ghassan, A.; Beliz, O.; Carl, A. 2010. Facilitating innovation in construction: directions and implications for research and policy, Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management 10(4): 374-394.
8. Green, K. W.; Zelbst, P. J.; Meacham, J.; Bhadauria, V. S. 2012. Green supply chain management practices: impact on performance, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 17(3): 290-305.
9. Håkansson, H.; Ingemansson, M. 2013. Industrial renewal within the construction network, Construction Management and Economics 31(1): 40-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2012.737470
10. Hwang, C. L.; Yoon, K. S. 1981. Multiple attribute decisionmaking. Methods and applications. Berlin, Heidelberg, hNtetpw://Ydoxr.dko: iS.oprrgin/1g0e.r1-V00e7rl/a9g7.8 2-35-96 p4.2-48318-9
11. Kaklauskas, A.; RutB, J.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Daniunas, A.; Pruskus, V.; Bivainis, J.; Gudauskas, R.; Plakys, V. 2012. Passive house model for quantitative and qualitative analys1e8s. ahnttdp :i/t/sd ixn.dteolil.iogregn/t1 s0y.1st0e1m6,/jE.ennebrugiyld a.2n0d1 B2u.0il3d.i0n0g8s 50: 7-
12. Kanapeckiene, L.; Kaklauskas, A.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Seniut, M. 2010. Integrated knowledge management model and system for construction projects, Engineering Applications of hAtrttpif:/i/cdiaxl. dIonit.eolrligg/e1n0c.1e0 2136(/4j.)e:n 1g2a0p0p-a1i.221051.0.01.030
13. Kildiene, S. 2013. Assessment of opportunities for construction enterprises in European Union Member States using the MULTIMOORA method, 11th International Conference on Modern Building Materials, Structures and Techniques, Procedia Engineering 57: 557-564.
14. Kim, S. K.; Lee, B. G.; Park, B. S.; Oh, S. K. 2011. The effect of R&D, technology commercialization capabilities and innovation performance, Technological and Economic hDtetpv:e/l/odpxm.deoni.to orgf/E1c0o.3n8o4m6y/ 21072(944):9 51633.2-051718..6 03481
15. Manley, K. J. 2008. Against the odds: small firms in Australia successfully introducing new technology on construction projects, Research Policy 37(10): 1751-1764. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.013
16. MaskeliunaitB, L.; Sivilevicius, H. 2012. Expert evaluation of criteria describing the quality of travelling by international passenger train: technological, economic and safety perspectives, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 18(3): 544-566. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012. 710178
17. Mat, A.; Razak, C. R. 2011. Technological innovation implementation: a proposed model on organizational learning ccaopmapblielixtiyt y, with moderating effect of knowledge Full Length Research Paper 7(12): 926-935.
18. Mazurkiewicz, A.; Poteralska, B. 2012. System of a complex assessment of technological innovative solutions, Problemy Eksploatacji-Maintenance Problems (4): 5-21.
19. Montalvo, C.; van der Giessen, A. 2012. Sectoral innovation watch-synthesis report, Europe INNOVA Sectoral InnovCaotmiomn iWssaiotcnh, ,M foary D20G1 2E. nterprise and Industry, European
20. Moore, G. A. 1991. Crossing the chasm: marketing and selling high-tech products to mainstream customers. New York: Harper Business Essentials. 227 p.
21. Oliveira, S. R. M.; Lino, J. 2013. Model for technological innovation integration and new product development in high tech environments, International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies 3(4): 919-930.
22. Paelnick, J. H. P. 1976. Qualitative multiple criteria analysis, environmental protection and multiregional development, hPtatpp:e/r/ds xo.df othi.eo rRge/1g0io.1n0a0l 7S/cBieFn0c1e9 A44ss3o7c5i ation 36(1): 59-74.
23. Saaty, T. L. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, pHriilol.r 2it8y7 s pet. ting, resources allocation. London: McGraw
24. Shadiya, O. O.; High, K. A. 2012. Sustainability evaluator: tool for evaluating process sustainability, Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy 32(3): 749-761.
25. Schiederig, T.; Tietze, F.; Herstatt, C. 2012. Green innovation in technology and innovation management-an exploratory literature review, R&D Management http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-931 04.22(021)1:.108006-7129.x2.
26. Skibniewski, M. J.; Zavadskas E. K. 2013. Technology development in construction: a continuum from distant past into the future, Journal of Civil Engineering and Managehmtetpn: t//1d9x(.1d)o: i1.o3r6g-/1104.73.8 46/13923730.2012.756060
27. TamošaitienB, J.; Gaudutis, E. 2013. Complex assessment of structural systems used for high-rise buildings, Journal of hCtitvpi:l//dExn. dgoini.eoerrgi/n1g0.3a8n4d6/1M39a2n3a7g3e0m.2en0t1 31.797(220):7 13 05-317.
28. TamošaitienB, J.; Zavadskas, E. K. 2013. The multi-stage decision making system for complicated problems, World Conference on Psychology and Sociology 2012, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 82: 215-219.
29. TamošaitienB, J.; Šipalis, J.; Banaitis, A.; Gaudutis, E. 2013. Complex model for the assessment of the location of high-rise buildings in the city urban structure, Internatio1n0al9 .J ohuttrpn:/a/dl xo.fd Sotir.oartegg/1ic0.P3r8o4p6e/1rt6y4 M87a1n5aXg.e2m0e1n3t. 71871(916):8 9 3
30. Teece, D. J. 2010. Business models, business strategy and innohvatttpio:/n/d, x.dLooi.nogrg/10R.a1n0g1e6/j.lrPpl.a2n0n0i9n.g0 7.04033( 2): 172-194.
31. Testa, F.; Iraldo, F.; Frey, M. 2011. The effect of environmental regulation on firms' competitive performance: the case of the building & construction sector in some EU regions, 2Jo1u4r4n. ahlt topf:/E/dnxv.idrooni. moregn/1ta0l. 1M0a1n6a/jg.jeemnvenmt a9n2.2(90)1: 12.10336.0-39
32. Turskis, Z. 2008. Multi-attribute contractors ranking method by applying ordering of feasible alternatives of solutions in terms of preferability technique, Technological and Ecohntotmp: i/c/d Dx.edvoeil.ooprgm/e1n0t. 3o8f 4E6c/1o3n9o2m-y8 61149(2.2):0 0282.41-42.23294.-239
33. VasauskaitB, J.; Snieška, V.; DrakšaitB, A. 2011. Nauju technolvoegikijsun iadii,e gimas Lietuvos pramoneje: sprendimai ir ju Economics and Management 16: 418-427.
34. Von Hippel, E. 1988. The sources of innovation. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 218 p.
35. Wu, C. R.; Lin, C. T.; Chen, H. C. 2008. Is FHC the preferable bancassureance alliance model from supervisory authorities' perspectives in Taiwan using AHP and GRA, The Journal of Grey System 1: 39-52.
36. Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z.; TamošaitienB, J. 2011. Selection of construction enterprises management strategy based on the SWOT and multi-criteria analysis, Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 11(4): 1063-1082.