Complex assessment of structural systems used for high-rise buildings

Journal of Civil Engineering and Management

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 305-317

  Tamošaitiene, Jolanta ^a   Gaudutis, Ernestas ^a  

^a VILNIUS GEDIMINAS TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

complex assessment; COPRAS G; expert judgment; grey numbers; high rise building; MCDM; structural system

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX ASSESSMENT; COPRAS-G; EXPERT JUDGMENT; GREY NUMBER; HIGH RISE BUILDING; MCDM; STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS;

CIVIL ENGINEERING;

TALL BUILDINGS;

EID: 84876760215     PISSN: 13923730     EISSN: 18223605     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3846/13923730.2013.772071     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Akadiri, P. O.; Chinyio, E. A.; Olomolaiye, P. O. 2012. Design of a sustainable building: A conceptual framework for implementing sustainability in the building sector, Buildings 2(2): 126-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ buildings2020126
2. Ali, M. M.; Moon, K. S. 2007. Structural developments in tall buildings: Current trends and future prospects, Architectural Science Review 50(3): 205-223. http://dx.doi.org/10.3763/asre.2007.5027
3. Bitarafan, M.; Hashemkhani Zolfani, S.; Arefi, S. L.; Zavadskas, E. K. 2012. Evaluating the construction methods of cold-formed steel structures in reconstructing the areas damaged in natural crises, using the methods AHP and COPRAS-G, Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 12(3): 360-367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2012.06.015
4. Berge, B. 2012. The ecology of building materials. Routledge. 448 p.
5. Bojković, N.; Anić, I.; Pejcić-Tarle, S. 2010. One solution for cross-country transport-sustainability evaluation using a modified ELECTRE method, Ecological Economics 69(5): 1176-1186. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.ecolecon.2010.01.006
6. Chatterjee, P.; Chakraborty, S. 2012. Material selection using preferential ranking methods, Materials & Design 35: 384-393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.027
7. Chatterjee, P.; Athawale, V. M.; Chakraborty, S. 2011. Materials selection using complex proportional assessment and evaluation of mixed data methods, Materials & Design 32(2): 851-860. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. matdes.2010.07.010
8. Choi, W.; Joe, J.; Kwak, Y.; Huh, J.-H. 2012. Operation and control strategies for multi-storey double skin facades during the heating season, Energy and Buildings 49: 454-465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.02. 047
9. Dejus, T. 2011. Safety of technological projects using multicriteria decision making methods, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 17(2): 177-183.
10. Dixit, M. K.; Ferna'ndez-Soli's, J. L.; Lavy, S.; Culp, C. H. 2012. Need for an embodied energy measurement protocol for buildings: A review paper, Renewable & Sustainable Energy Review 16(6): 3730-3743. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.rser.2012.03.021
11. Dixit, M. K.; Ferna'ndez-Soli's, J. L.; Lavy, S.; Culp, C. H. 2010. Identification of parameters for embodied energy measurement: A literature review, Energy and Buildings 42(8): 1238-1247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. enbuild.2010.02.016
12. Fiaschi, D.; Bandinelli, R.; Conti, S. 2012. A case study for energy issues of public buildings and utilities in a small municipality: Investigation of possible improvements and integration with renewables, Applied Energy 97: 101-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.03.008
13. Fujita, M. 2012. Reuse system of building steel structures - str uctural performance of reusable members and practical examples, Key Engineering Materials 517: 513-521. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.517.513
14. Gupta, R.; Sachdeva, A.; Bhardwaj, A. 2012. Selection of logistic service provider using fuzzy PROMETHEE for a cement industry, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 23(7): 899-921. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ 17410381211267727
15. Hang, J.; Li, Y.; Sandberg, M.; Buccolieri, R.; Di Sabatino, S. 2012. The influence of building height variability on pollutant dispersion and pedestrian ventilation in idealized high-rise urban areas, Building and Environment 56: 346-360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.03.023
16. Hearn, G.;Wise, D. Hart, A; Morgan, C. 2012. Assessing the potential for future first-time slope failures to impact the oil and gas pipeline corridor through the Makarov Mountains, Sakhalin Island, Russia, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology & Hydrogeology 45(1): 79-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1144/ 1470-9236/10-033
17. Hong, T.; Ji, C.; Park, H. 2012. Integrated model for assessing the cost and CO2 emission (IMACC) for sustainable structural design in ready-mix concrete, Journal of Environmental Management 103: 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.jenvman.2012.02.034
18. Jiao, Y.; Lloyd, C. R.; Wakes, S. J. 2012. The relationship between total embodied energy and cost of commercial buildings, Energy and Buildings 52: 20-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.05.028
19. Kaklauskas, A.; Rute, J.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Daniunas, A.; Pruskus, V.; Bivainis, J.; Gudauskas, R.; Plakys, V. 2012. Passive house model for quantitative and qualitative analyses and its intelligent system, Energy and Buildings 50: 7-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.03.008
20. Kendall, M. G. 1970. Rank correlation methods. 4th ed. London: Griffin. p 365.
21. Kildiene, S.; Kaklauskas, A.; Zavadskas, E. K. 2011. COPRAS based comparative analysis of the European country management capabilities within the construction sector in the time of crisis, Journal of Business Economics and Management 12(2): 417-434. http://dx. doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2011.575190
22. Kua, H. W.; Wong, C. L. 2012. Analyzing the life cycle greenhouse gas emission and energy consumption of a multi-storied commercial building in Singapore from an extended system boundary perspective, Energy and Buildings 51: 6-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.03.027
23. Lee, S.; Joo, J.; Kim, J. T.; Kim, S. 2012. An analysis of the CO2 reduction effect of a column-beam structure using composite precast concrete members, Indoor and Built Environment 21(1): 150-162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 1420326X11423162
24. Li, P.;Wu, J.; Qian, H. 2012. Groundwater quality assessment based on rough sets attribute reduction and TOPSIS method in a semi-arid area, China, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 184(8): 4841-4854. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1007/s10661-011-2306-1
25. Medineckiene, M.; Bjork, F. 2011. Owner preferences regarding renovation measures the demonstration of using multi-criteria decision making, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 17(2): 284-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/ 13923730.2011.582380.
26. Medineckiene, M.; Turskis, Z.; Zavadskas, E. K. 2011. Life-Cycle analysis of a sustainable building, applying Multi-Criteria Decision Making method, in C ygas, D.; Froehner, K. D. (Eds.). The 8th International Conference ''Environmental Engineering'': Selected papers. 19-20 May, 2011, Vilnius, Lithuania. Vilnius: Technika, 957-961.
27. Mulliner, E.; Smallbone, K.; Maliene, V. 2013. An assessment of sustainable housing affordability using a multiple criteria decision making method, Omega 41(2): 270-279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2012.05.002
28. Parasonis, J. 2008. Basics of buildings structure design. Vilnius: Technika. 219 p. (in Lithuanian). http://dx. doi.org/10.3846/997-S
29. Parasonis, J.; Gaudutis, E. 2009. Origin and evolution of high-rise buildings, Town Planning and Architecture 33(3): 158-172. http://dx.doi.org/10. 3846/1392-1630. 2009.33.158-172
30. Peças, P.; Ribeiro, I.; Silva, A.; Henriques, E. 2013. Comprehensive approach for informed life cyclebased materials selection, Materials & Design 43: 220-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.06. 064
31. Qian, Y. M.; Jin, J. Y.; Tian, W. 2012. Research on applying the reborn resource and new materials for energy saving and protecting environment in the design of green ecological residential building design at the super cold district, Applied Mechanics and Materials 152-154: 826-834. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.4028/www. scientific.net/AMM.152-154.826
32. Razaitis, V. 2004. Basics of building construction. Vilnius: Dailes akademijos leidykla. 325 p. (in Lithuanian).
33. Roozbahani, A.; Zahraie, B.; Tabesh, M. 2012. PROMETHEE with precedence order in the criteria (PPOC) as a new group decision making aid: An application in urban water supply management, Water Resources Management 26(12): 3581-3599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0091-4
34. Sivilevicius, H. 2011. Application of expert evaluation method to determine the importance of operating asphalt mixing plant quality criteria and rank correlation, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 6(1): 48-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2011.07
35. Shen, L.-Y; Tam, W. Y. V.; Tam, L.; Ji, Y.-B. 2010. Project feasibility study: The key to successful implementation of sustainable and socially responsible construction management practice, Journal of Cleaner Production 18(3): 254-259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.10.014
36. STR 1.01.06:2002 Technical Construction Regulation ''Structures of Exceptional Significance''. Republic of Lithuania, 2002. (in Lithuanian). STR 2.02.01:2004 Technical Construction Regulation ''Residential Buildings''. Republic of Lithuania, 2004. (in Lithuanian). Taranath, B. 1998. Steel, concrete, and composite design of tall buildings. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1024 p.
37. Tupenaite, L.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Kaklauskas, A.; Turskis, Z.; Seniut, M. 2010. Mutiple criteria assessment of alternatives for built and human environment renovation, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 16(2): 257-266. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2010.30
38. Turskis, Z.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Peldshus, F. 2009. Multicriteria optimization system for decision making in construction design and management, Inzinerine Ekonomika Engineering Economics (1): 7-17.
39. Yuan, Y.; Yuan, J.; Du, H.; Li, L. 2012. An improved multiobjective ant colony algorithm for building life cycle energy consumption optimization, International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology 43(1): 60-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJCAT.2012.045842
40. Zavadskas, E. K. 1987. Complex estimation and choice of resource saving decisions in construction. Vilnius: Mokslas (in Russian).
41. Zavadskas, E. K.; Kaklauskas, A. 1996. Multiple criteria evaluation of buildings. Vilnius: Technika. 275 p.
42. (in Lithuanian). Zavadskas, E. K.; Kaklauskas, A.; Turskis, Z.; Tamosaitiene ̇, J. 2009. Multi-attribute decision-making model by applying grey numbers, Informatica 20(2): 305-320.
43. Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z.; Tamosaitiene, J. 2010. Risk assessment of construction projects, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 16(1): 33-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2010.03
44. Zavadskas, E. K.;Kaklauskas, A.;Turskis,Z.;Tamosaitiene, J.; Kalibatas, D. 2011. Assessment of the indoor environment of dwelling houses by applying the COPRAS-G method: Lithuania case study, Environmental Engineering and Management Journal 10(5): 637-647.
45. Zavadskas, E. K.; Vainiunas, P.; Turskis, Z.; Tamosaitiene, J. 2012. Multiple criteria decision support system for assessment of projects managers in construction, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 11(2): 501-502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219622012400135
46. Zuo, J.; Read, B.; Pullen, S.; Shi, Q. 2012. Achieving carbon neutrality in commercial building developments -Perceptions of the construction industry, Habitat International 36(2): 278-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint. 2011.10.010