Characterization and application of a flow system for in vitro multispecies oral biofilm formation

Journal of Periodontal Research

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 323-332

  Blanc, V ^a   Isabal, S ^a   Sanchez M C ^b   Llama Palacios, A ^b   Herrera, D ^b   Sanz, M ^b   Leon R ^a  

^a Department of Microbiology DENTAID S L ^*  (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Biofilm model; Chlorhexidine; Confocal laser scanning microscopy; Oral bacteria

Indexed keywords

CETYLPYRIDINIUM SALT; CHLORHEXIDINE; HYDROXYAPATITE; MOUTHWASH; SODIUM FLUORIDE; TOPICAL ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT;

ACTINOMYCES; AGGREGATIBACTER ACTINOMYCETEMCOMITANS; BACTERIAL LOAD; BIOFILM; BIOREACTOR; CHEMISTRY; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; DRUG EFFECTS; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; FUSOBACTERIUM NUCLEATUM; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HUMAN; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TEST; MICROBIAL VIABILITY; MICROBIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION; MICROBIOLOGY; MOUTH; PHYSIOLOGY; PORPHYROMONAS GINGIVALIS; SALIVA; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STREPTOCOCCUS ORALIS; VEILLONELLA;

ACTINOMYCES; AGGREGATIBACTER ACTINOMYCETEMCOMITANS; ANTI-INFECTIVE AGENTS, LOCAL; BACTERIAL LOAD; BACTERIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; BIOFILMS; BIOREACTORS; CETYLPYRIDINIUM; CHLORHEXIDINE; DURAPATITE; FUSOBACTERIUM NUCLEATUM; HUMANS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TESTS; MICROBIAL VIABILITY; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MOUTH; MOUTHWASHES; PORPHYROMONAS GINGIVALIS; SALIVA; SODIUM FLUORIDE; STREPTOCOCCUS ORALIS; VEILLONELLA;

EID: 84899653970     PISSN: 00223484     EISSN: 16000765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jre.12110     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 1999;284:1318-1322.
2. Hall-Stoodley L, Costerton JW, Stoodley P. Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat Rev Microbiol 2004;2:95-108.
3. Donlan RM, Costerton JW. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev 2002;15:167-193.
4. Jenkinson HF, Lamont RJ. Oral microbial communities in sickness and in health. Trends Microbiol 2005;13:589-595.
5. Taylor CJ, Mahenthiralingam E. Functional foods and paediatric gastro-intestinal health and disease. Ann Trop Paediatr 2006;26:79-86.
6. Filoche S, Wong L, Sissons CH. Oral biofilms: emerging concepts in microbial ecology. J Dent Res 2010;89:8-18.
7. Beighton D. Can the ecology of the dental biofilm be beneficially altered? Adv Dent Res 2009;21:69-73.
8. Sheiham A, Netuvile GS. Periodontal diseases in Europe. Periodontol 2000 2000;29:104-121.
9. Paster BJ, Boches SK, Galvin JL et al. Bacterial diversity in human subgingival plaque. J Bacteriol 2001;183:3770-3783.
10. Kolenbrander PE, Andersen RN, Blehert DS, Egland PG, Foster JS, Palmer RJ Jr. Communication among oral bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2002;66:486-505.
11. Hojo K, Nagaoka S, Ohshima T, Maeda N. Bacterial interactions in dental biofilm development. J Dent Res 2009;88:982-990.
12. Palmer RJ Jr, Gordon SM, Cisar JO, Kolenbrander PE. Coaggregation-mediated interactions of streptococci and actinomyces detected in initial human dental plaque. J Bacteriol 2003;185:3400-3409.
13. Yoshida Y, Ganguly S, Bush CA, Cisar JO. Carbohydrate engineering of the recognition motifs in streptococcal co-aggregation receptor polysaccharides. Mol Microbiol 2005;58:244-256.
14. Tang G, Yip HK, Cutress TW, Samaranayake LP. Artificial mouth model systems and their contribution to caries research: a review. J Dent 2003;31:161-171.
15. Guggenheim B, Giertsen E, Schüpbach P, Shapiro S. Validation of an in vitro biofilm model of supragingival plaque. J Dent Res 2001;80:363-370.
16. Foster JS, Kolenbrander PE. Development of a multispecies oral bacterial community in a saliva-conditioned flow cell. Appl Environ Microbiol 2004;70:4340-4348.
17. Sedlacek MJ, Walker C. Antibiotic resistance in an in vitro subgingival biofilm model. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2007;22:333-339.
18. Sánchez MC, Llama-Palacios A, Blanc V, León R, Herrera D, Sanz M. Structure, viability and bacterial kinetics of an in vitro biofilm model using six bacteria from the subgingival microbiota. J Periodontal Res 2011;46:252-260.
19. Alsina M, Ollé E, Frías J. Improved, low-cost selective culture medium for Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans. J Clin Microbiol 2001;39:509-513.
20. Dawes C, Watanabe S, Biglow-Lecomte P, Dibdin GH. Estimation of the velocity of the salivary film at some different locations in the mouth. J Dent Res 1989;68:1479-1482.
21. Nickel JC, Wright JB, Ruseska I, Marrie TJ, Whitfield C, Costerton JW. Antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonizing a urinary catheter in vitro. Eur J Clin Microbiol 1985;4:213-218.
22. Herrera D, Roldán S, Santacruz I, Santos S, Masdevall M, Sanz M. Differences in antimicrobial activity of four commercial 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthrinse formulations: an in vitro contact test and salivary bacterial counts study. J Clin Periodontol 2003;30:307-314.
23. Wei GX, Campagna AN, Bobek LA. Effect of MUC7 peptides on the growth of bacteria and on Streptococcus mutans biofilm. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006;57:1100-1109.
24. Helmerhorst EJ, Hodgson R, van't Hof W, Veerman EC, Allison C, Nieuw Amerongen AV. The effects of histatin derived basic antimicrobial peptides on oral biofilms. J Dent Res 1999;78:1245-1250.
25. Corbin A, Pitts B, Parker A, Stewart PS. Antimicrobial penetration and efficacy in an in vitro oral biofilm model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011;55:3338-3344.
26. Guggenheim B, Meier A. In vitro effect of chlorhexidine mouth rinses on polyspecies biofilms. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 2011;121:432-441.
27. Periasamy S, Kolenbrander PE. Central role of the early colonizer Veillonella sp. in establishing multispecies biofilm communities with initial, middle, and late colonizers of enamel. J Bacteriol 2010;192:2965-2972.
28. Periasamy S, Kolenbrander PE. Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans builds mutualistic biofilm communities with Fusobacterium nucleatum and Veillonella species in saliva. Infect Immun 2009;77:3542-3551.
29. Vaughan BL Jr, Smith BG, Chopp DL. The influence of fluid flow on modeling quorum sensing in bacterial biofilms. Bull Math Biol 2010;72:1143-1165.
30. Drescher K, Dunkel J, Cisneros LH, Ganguly S, Goldstein RE. Fluid dynamics and noise in bacterial cell-cell and cell-surface scattering. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108:10940-10945.
31. Laue H, Schenk A, Li H et al. Contribution of alginate and levan production to biofilm formation by Pseudomonas syringae. Microbiology 2006;152:2909-2918.
32. Maezono H, Noiri Y, Asahi Y et al. Antibiofilm effects of azithromycin and erythromycin on Porphyromonas gingivalis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011;55:5887-5892.
33. Douterelo I, Sharpe RL, Boxall JB. Influence of hydraulic regimes on bacterial community structure and composition in an experimental drinking water distribution system. Water Res 2013;47:503-516.
34. Foka A, Katsikogianni MG, Anastassiou ED, Spiliopoulou I, Missirlis YF. The combined effect of surface chemistry and flow conditions on Staphylococcus epidermidis adhesion and ica operon expression. Eur Cell Mater 2012;24:386-402.
35. Weaver WM, Milisavljevic V, Miller JF, Di Carlo D. Fluid flow induces biofilm formation in Staphylococcus epidermidis polysaccharide intracellular adhesin-positive clinical isolates. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012;78:5890-5896.
36. Oliver JD. The viable but nonculturable state in bacteria. J Microbiol 2005;43:93-100.
37. Cerca F, Trigo G, Correia A, Cerca N, Azeredo J, Vilanova M. SYBR green as a fluorescent probe to evaluate the biofilm physiological state of Staphylococcus epidermidis, using flow cytometry. Can J Microbiol 2011;10:850-856.
38. Venugopalan VP, Kuehn M, Hausner M, Springael D, Wilderer PA, Wuertz S. Architecture of a nascent Sphingomonas sp. biofilm under varied hydrodynamic conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005;71:2677-2686.
39. Hope CK, Clements D, Wilson M. Determining the spatial distribution of viable and nonviable bacteria in hydrated microcosm dental plaques by viability profiling. J Appl Microbiol 2002;93:448-455.
40. Bridier A, Briandet R, Thomas V, Dubois-Brissonnet F. Resistance of bacterial biofilms to disinfectants: a review. Biofouling 2011;27:1017-1032.
41. Mendieta C, Vallcorba N, Binney A, Addy M. Comparison 0f 2 chlorhexidine mouthwashes on plaque regrowth in vivo and dietary staining in vitro. J Clin Periodontol 1994;21:296-300.
42. Quirynen M, Avontroodt, Peeters W, Pauwels M, Coucke W, van Steenberghe D. Effect of different chlorhexidine formulations in mouthrinses on de novo plaque formation. J Clin Periodontol 2001;28:1127-1136.
43. Pratten J, Smith AW, Wilson M. Response of single species biofilms and microcosm dental plaques to pulsing with chlorhexidine. J Antimicrob Chemother 1998;42:453-459.
44. Shapiro S, Giertsen E, Guggenheim B. An in vitro oral biofilm model for comparing the efficacy of antimicrobial mouthrinses. Caries Res 2002;36:93-100.
45. Wood SR, Kirkham J, Marsh PD, Shore RC, Nattress B, Robinson C. Architecture of intact natural human plaque biofilms studied by confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Dent Res 2000;79:21-27.