Functionalizable hydrogel microparticles of tunable size and stiffness for soft-tissue filler applications

Acta Biomaterialia

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 2563-2573

  Chan, Ka Man Carmen ^a,b   Li, Randolph H ^a,b   Chapman, Joseph W ^a   Trac, Eric M ^b   Kobler, James B ^a   Zeitels, Steven M ^a   Langer, Robert ^b   Karajanagi, Sandeep S ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

Author keywords

Hydrogel; Microparticles; Soft tissue filler; Suspension photopolymerization

Indexed keywords

CONTROLLED DRUG DELIVERY; FILLERS; HYALURONIC ACID; PARTICLE SIZE; PHOTOPOLYMERIZATION; STIFFNESS; SYNTHETIC POLYMERS; TARGETED DRUG DELIVERY; TISSUE;

INJECTABLE BIOMATERIALS; MICRO PARTICLES; PARTICLE CHARACTERISTICS; PHOTO POLYMERIZATION; PROCESS PARAMETERS; SOFT TISSUE; SOFT-TISSUE FILLER; SUSPENSION PHOTOPOLYMERIZATION; TUNABLE SIZES; TUNABLE STIFFNESS;

HYDROGELS;

BIOMATERIAL; DEXAMETHASONE; FILLER; MACROGOL; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL DIACRYLATE; RHODAMINE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; HYDROGEL; MICROSPHERE;

ARTICLE; DRUG DISTRIBUTION; ENCAPSULATION; HYDROGEL; HYDROGEL MICROPARTICLE; IN VITRO STUDY; INJECTION SITE; PARTICLE SIZE; POLYMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGIDITY; SOFT TISSUE; SUSPENSION; CONNECTIVE TISSUE;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; HYDROGELS; MICROSPHERES; PARTICLE SIZE;

EID: 84899628030     PISSN: 17427061     EISSN: 18787568     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.02.021     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Lowe NJ, Maxwell CA, Patnaik R. Adverse reactions to dermal fillers: review. Dermatol Surg 2005;31:1616-25.
2. Sankar V, McGuff HS. Foreign body reaction to calcium hydroxylapatite after lip augmentation. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138:1093-6.
3. Zielke H, Wolber L, Wiest L, Rzany B. Risk profiles of different injectable fillers: results from the Injectable Filler Safety Study (IFS Study). Dermatol Surg 2008;34:326-35.
4. Herschorn S. Current use of injectable agents for female stress urinary incontinence. Rev Urol 2005;7(Suppl. 1):S12-21.
5. Yang JH, Lee SM, Won CH, Chang SE, Lee MW, Choi JH, et al. Foreign body granuloma caused by hyaluronic acid/dextranomer microsphere filler injection. Int J Dermatol 2012;51:1517-8.
6. Tezel A, Fredrickson GH. The science of hyaluronic acid dermal fillers. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2008;10:35-42.
7. Henly DR, Barrett DM, Weiland TL, O'Connor MK, Malizia AA, Wein AJ. Particulate silicone for use in periurethral injections: local tissue effects and search for migration. J Urol 1995;153:2039-43.
8. FDA U. Guidance for industry and FDA staff vocal fold medialization devices - premarket notification 51(k)] Submissions 2004;510.
9. Morhenn VB, Lemperle G, Gallo RL. Phagocytosis of different particulate dermal filler substances by human macrophages and skin cells. Dermatol Surg 2002;28:484-90.
10. Gelb H, Schumacher HR, Cuckler J, Ducheyne P, Baker DG. In vivo inflammatory response to polymethylmethacrylate particulate debris: effect of size, morphology, and surface area. J Orthop Res 1994;12:83-92.
11. Matlaga BF, Yasenchak LP, Salthouse TN. Tissue response to implanted polymers: the significance of sample shape. J Biomed Mater Res 1976;10:391-7.
12. Bellis SL. Advantages of RGD peptides for directing cell association with biomaterials. Biomaterials 2011;32:4205-10.
13. Brodbeck WG, Patel J, Voskerician G, Christenson E, Shive MS, Nakayama Y, et al. Biomaterial adherent macrophage apoptosis is increased by hydrophilic and anionic substrates in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99:10287-92.
14. Kamath S, Bhattacharyya D, Padukudru C, Timmons RB, Tang L. Surface chemistry influences implant-mediated host tissue responses. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008;86:617-26.
15. Thevenot P, Hu W, Tang L. Surface chemistry influences implant biocompatibility. Curr Top Med Chem 2008;8:270-80.
16. Khandwekar AP, Patil DP, Shouche Y, Doble M. Surface engineering of polycaprolactone by biomacromolecules and their blood compatibility. J Biomater Appl 2011;26:227-52.
17. Fakhari A, Berkland C. Applications and emerging trends of hyaluronic acid in tissue engineering, as a dermal filler and in osteoarthritis treatment. Acta Biomater 2013;9:7081-92.
18. Edsman K, Nord LI, Ohrlund A, Larkner H, Kenne AH. Gel properties of hyaluronic acid dermal fillers. Dermatol Surg 2012;38:1170-9.
19. Kablik J, Monheit GD, Yu L, Chang G, Gershkovich J. Comparative physical properties of hyaluronic acid dermal fillers. Dermatol Surg 2009;35(Suppl 1):302-12.
20. Baumann L, Blyumin M, Saghari S. Dermal fillers. In: Weisberg E, editor. Cosmetic dermatology: principles and practice. Philadelphia, PA: McGraw-Hill Professional; 2007. p. 191-211.
21. Helgeson ME, Chapin SC, Doyle PS. Hydrogel microparticles from lithographic processes: novel materials for fundamental and applied colloid science. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 2011;16:106-17.
22. Merkel TJ, Jones SW, Herlihy KP, Kersey FR, Shields AR, Napier M, et al. Using mechanobiological mimicry of red blood cells to extend circulation times of hydrogel microparticles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108:586-91.
23. Dendukuri D, Pregibon DC, Collins J, Hatton TA, Doyle PS. Continuous-flow lithography for high-throughput microparticle synthesis. Nat Mater 2006;5:365-9.
24. Xu S, Nie Z, Seo M, Lewis P, Kumacheva E, Stone HA, et al. Generation of monodisperse particles by using microfluidics: control over size, shape, and composition. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2005;44:724-8.
25. Haghgooie R, Toner M, Doyle PS. Squishy non-spherical hydrogel microparticles. Macromol Rapid Commun 2010;31:128-34.
26. Acharya G, Shin CS, McDermott M, Mishra H, Park H, Kwon IC, et al. The hydrogel template method for fabrication of homogeneous nano/ microparticles. J Control Release 2010;141:314-9.
27. Sahiner N, Jha AK, Nguyen D, Jia XQ. Fabrication and characterization of crosslinkable hydrogel particles based on hyaluronic acid: potential application in vocal fold regeneration. J Biomater Sci-Polym Ed 2008;19:223-43.
28. John G, Morita M. Synthesis and characterization of photo-cross-linked networks based on L-lactide/serine copolymers. Macromolecules 1999;32:1853-8.
29. Kumar A, Lahiri SS, Singh H. Development of PEGDMA: MAA based hydrogel microparticles for oral insulin delivery. Int J Pharm 2006;323:117-24.
30. Rodrigo R, Toro CA, Cuellar J. Influence of the geometric factors of the experimental device used in suspension polymerization on the properties of poly(styrene-co-divinylbenzene) microparticles. J Appl Polym Sci 2012;124:1431-46.
31. Bryant SJ, Nuttelman CR, Anseth KS. Cytocompatibility of UV and visible light photoinitiating systems on cultured NIH/3T3 fibroblasts in vitro. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2000;11:439-57.
32. Fairbanks BD, Schwartz MP, Bowman CN, Anseth KS. Photoinitiated polymerization of PEG-diacrylate with lithium phenyl-2,4,6- trimethylbenzoylphosphinate: polymerization rate and cytocompatibility. Biomaterials 2009;30:6702-7.
33. Williams CG, Malik AN, Kim TK, Manson PN, Elisseeff JH. Variable cytocompatibility of six cell lines with photoinitiators used for polymerizing hydrogels and cell encapsulation. Biomaterials 2005;26:1211-8.
34. Panda P, Ali S, Lo E, Chung BG, Hatton TA, Khademhosseini A, et al. Stop-flow lithography to generate cell-laden microgel particles. Lab Chip 2008;8:1056-61.
35. Sharma B, Fermanian S, Gibson M, Unterman S, Herzka DA, Cascio B, et al. Human cartilage repair with a photoreactive adhesive-hydrogel composite. Sci Transl Med 2013;5.
36. ICRS 2013 press release. Hydrogel Implant GelrinC Demonstrates Impressive Recovery Rates for Patients with Knee Cartilage Damage. http:// www.regentis.co.il/files/files/ICRS%202013%20press%20release.pdf.
37. Van Den Bulcke AI, Bogdanov B, De Rooze N, Schacht EH, Cornelissen M, Berghmans H. Structural and rheological properties of methacrylamide modified gelatin hydrogels. Biomacromolecules 2000;1:31-8.
38. Camci-Unal G, Nichol JW, Bae H, Tekin H, Bischoff J, Khademhosseini A. Hydrogel surfaces to promote attachment and spreading of endothelial progenitor cells. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2012;7:337-47.
39. Kim DH, Martin DC. Sustained release of dexamethasone from hydrophilic matrices using PLGA nanoparticles for neural drug delivery. Biomaterials 2006;27:3031-7.
40. Ju YM, Yu B, West L, Moussy Y, Moussy F. A dexamethasone-loaded PLGA microspheres/collagen scaffold composite for implantable glucose sensors. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010;93:200-10.
41. Habeeb AF. Determination of free amino groups in proteins by trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid. Anal Biochem 1966;14:328-36.
42. Snyder SL, Sobocinski PZ. An improved 2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid method for the determination of amines. Anal Biochem 1975;64:284-8.
43. Brown E, Zhang H, Forman NA, Maynor BW, Betts DE, DeSimone JM, et al. Shear thickening in densely packed suspensions of spheres and rods confined to few layers. J Rheol 2010;54:1023-46.
44. Menut P, Seiffert S, Sprakel J, Weitz DA. Does size matter? Elasticity of compressed suspensions of colloidal- and granular-scale microgels. Soft Matter 2012;8:156-64.
45. Saralidze K, Koole LH, Knetsch MLW. Polymeric microspheres for medical applications. Materials 2010;3:3537-64.
46. Wischke C, Schwendeman SP. Principles of encapsulating hydrophobic drugs in PLA/PLGA microparticles. Int J Pharm 2008;364:298-327.
47. Sundaram H, Voigts B, Beer K, Meland M. Comparison of the rheological properties of viscosity and elasticity in two categories of soft tissue fillers: calcium hydroxylapatite and hyaluronic acid. Dermatol Surg 2010;36(Suppl. 3):1859-65.
48. Barrera DA, Zylstra E, Lansbury PT, Langer R. Synthesis and RGD peptide modification of a new biodegradable copolymer - poly(lactic acid-co-lysine). J Am Chem Soc 1993;115:11010-1.
49. Bhatnagar P, Nixon AJ, Kim I, Kameoka J. Protein functionalized micro hydrogel features for cell-surface interaction. Biomed Microdevices 2008; 10:567-71.
50. Rimmer S, Johnson C, Zhao B, Collier J, Gilmore L, Sabnis S, et al. Epithelialization of hydrogels achieved by amine functionalization and coculture with stromal cells. Biomaterials 2007;28:5319-31.
51. Saralidze K, Knetsch ML, van Hooy-Corstjens CS, Koole LH. Radio-opaque and surface-functionalized polymer microparticles: potentially safer biomaterials for different injection therapies. Biomacromolecules 2006;7:2991-6.
52. Rowley JA, Madlambayan G, Mooney DJ. Alginate hydrogels as synthetic extracellular matrix materials. Biomaterials 1999;20:45-53.
53. Alam M, Gladstone H, Kramer EM, Murphy Jr JP, Nouri K, Neuhaus IM, et al. ASDS guidelines of care: injectable fillers. Dermatol Surg 2008;34: S115-48.
54. Berkland C, King M, Cox A, Kim K, Pack DW. Precise control of PLG microsphere size provides enhanced control of drug release rate. J Control Release 2002;82:137-47.
55. Brooks BW. Suspension polymerization processes. Chem Eng Technol 2010;33:1737-44.
56. Gao ZQ, Grulke EA, Ray AK. Synthesis of monodisperse polymer microspheres by photopolymerization of microdroplets. Colloid Polym Sci 2007;285: 847-54.
57. Dowding PJ, Goodwin JW, Vincent B. Production of porous suspension polymers using a continuous tubular reactor. Colloid Polym Sci 2000;278:346-51.
58. Arshady R. Suspension, emulsion and dispersion polymerization - a methodological survey. Colloid Polym Sci 1992;270:717-32.