Influence of computed tomography angiography reconstruction software on anatomic measurements and endograft component selection for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Journal of Vascular Surgery

Volumn 59, Issue 5, 2014, Pages

  Corriere, Matthew A ^a   Islam, Arsalla ^a   Craven, Timothy E ^a   Conlee, Thomas D ^a   Hurie, Justin B ^a   Edwards, Matthew S ^a  

^a WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; AORTA BIFURCATION; AORTIC ANEURYSM ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL DIAMETER; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; DIGITAL IMAGING AND COMMUNICATIONS IN MEDICINE; ENDOVASCULAR ANEURYSM REPAIR; ILIAC ARTERY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGING SOFTWARE; INTERNAL ILIAC ARTERY; MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RENAL ARTERY; SURGEON; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; AORTOGRAPHY; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATIENT SELECTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REGISTRIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84899569676     PISSN: 07415214     EISSN: 10976809     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. E.L. Chaikof, D.C. Brewster, R.L. Dalman, M.S. Makaroun, K.A. Illig, and G.A. Sicard et al. The care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: the Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines J Vasc Surg 50 4 Suppl 2009 S2 49
2. A. Hyhlik-Durr, T. Krieger, P. Geisbusch, D. Kotelis, T. Able, and D. Bockler Reproducibility of deriving parameters of AAA rupture risk from patient-specific 3D finite element models J Endovasc Ther 18 2011 289 298
3. E. Neri, I. Bargellini, M. Rieger, A. Giachetti, C. Vignali, and M. Tuveri et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysms: virtual imaging and analysis through a remote web server Eur Radiol 15 2005 348 352
4. G.A. Pitoulias, K.P. Donas, S. Schulte, E.A. Aslanidou, and D.K. Papadimitriou Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional CT angiography in analysis of anatomical suitability for stentgraft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms Acta Radiol 52 2011 317 323
5. T. Ihara, K. Komori, K. Yamamoto, M. Kobayashi, H. Banno, and A. Kodama Three-dimensional workstation is useful for measuring the correct size of abdominal aortic aneurysm diameters Ann Vasc Surg 27 2013 154 161
6. N. Diehm, P. Herrmann, and H.P. Dinkel Multidetector CT angiography versus digital subtraction angiography for aortoiliac length measurements prior to endovascular AAA repair J Endovasc Ther 11 2004 527 534
7. J.M. Bland, and D.G. Altman Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement Lancet 1 1986 307 310
8. J.M. Bland, and D.G. Altman Measuring agreement in method comparison studies Stat Methods Med Res 8 1999 135 160
9. B. Rosner Fundamentals of biostatistics 6th ed. 2006 Thomson Higher Education Belmont, CA
10. T.M. Ghatwary, B.O. Patterson, A. Karthikesalingam, R.J. Hinchliffe, I.M. Loftus, and R. Morgan et al. A systematic review of protocols for the three-dimensional morphologic assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms using computed tomographic angiography Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 36 2013 14 24
11. C. Kauffmann, A. Tang, A. Dugas, É. Therasse, V. Oliva, and G. Soulez Clinical validation of a software for quantitative follow-up of abdominal aortic aneurysm maximal diameter and growth by CT angiography Eur J Radiol 77 2011 502 508