Microbial growth and carbon use efficiency in the rhizosphere and root-free soil

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2014, Pages

  Blagodatskaya, Evgenia ^a,b   Blagodatsky, Sergey ^b,c   Anderson, Traute Heidi ^d   Kuzyakov, Yakov ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^b INSTITUTE OF PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL PROBLEMS IN SOIL SCIENCE   (Russian Federation)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM   (Germany)

^d THÜNEN INSTITUTE OF CLIMATE SMART AGRICULTURE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA; GLUCOSE; BACTERIAL DNA; CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; NITROGEN; SOIL;

ARTICLE; BEET; BIOMASS; CARBON METABOLISM; GROWTH RATE; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; MICROBIAL GROWTH; MICROBIAL RESPIRATION; NONHUMAN; PLANT MICROORGANISM INTERACTION; PLANT ROOT; RHIZOSPHERE; SOIL; CHEMISTRY; ECOSYSTEM; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; ORGANISMAL INTERACTION; TIME;

BETA VULGARIS; BIOMASS; CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; DNA, BACTERIAL; ECOSYSTEM; GLUCOSE; MICROBIAL INTERACTIONS; NITROGEN; PLANT ROOTS; RHIZOSPHERE; SOIL; SOIL MICROBIOLOGY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84899564796     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093282     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Cheng W (2009) Rhizosphere priming effect: Its functional relationships with microbial turnover, evapotranspiration, and C-N budgets. Soil Biol Biochem 41: 1795-1801.
2. Gärdenäs AI, Ågren GI, Bird JA, Clarholm M, Hallin S, et al. (2011) Knowledge gaps in soil carbon and nitrogen interactions - From molecular to global scale. Soil Biol Biochem 43: 702-717.
3. Manzoni S, Taylor P, Richter A, Porporato A, Agren GI (2013) Environmental and stoichiometric controls on microbial carbon-use efficiency in soils. New Phytol 196: 79-91.
4. Bradford M, Keiser A, Davies C, Mersmann C, Strickland M (2013) Empirical evidence that soil carbon formation from plant inputs is positively related to microbial growth. Biogeochem 113: 271-281.
5. Anderson TH, Martens R (2013) DNA determinations during growth of soil microbial biomasses. Soil Biol Biochem 57: 487-495.
6. Keiblinger KM, Hall EK, Wanek W, Szukics U, Hammerle I, et al. (2010) The effect of resource quantity and resource stoichiometry on microbial carbon-use-efficiency. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 73: 430-440.
7. Schimel J, Schaeffer SM (2012) Microbial control over carbon cycling in soil. Frontiers in Microbiology 3: 348.
8. Allison SD, Wallenstein MD, Bradford MA (2010) Soil-carbon response to warming dependent on microbial physiology. Nature Geosci 3: 336-340.
9. Paterson E (2009) Comments on the regulatory gate hypothesis and implications for C-cycling in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 41: 1352-1354.
10. Berg G, Smalla K (2009) Plant species and soil type cooperatively shape the structure and function of microbial communities in the rhizosphere. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 68: 1-13.
11. Paterson E, Midwood AJ, Millard P (2009) Through the eye of the needle: a review of isotope approaches to quantify microbial processes mediating soil carbon balance. New Phytol 184: 19-33.
12. Grayston SJ, Wang S, Campbell CD, Edwards AC (1998) Selective influence of plant species on microbial diversity in the rhizosphere. Soil Biol Biochem 30: 369-378. (Pubitemid 28199126)
13. Blagodatskaya EV, Blagodatsky SA, Anderson TH, Kuzyakov Y (2007) Priming effects in Chernozem induced by glucose and N in relation to microbial growth strategies. Applied Soil Ecology 37: 95-105. (Pubitemid 47284843)
14. Pirt SJ (1975) Principles of microbe and cell cultivation: John Wiley & Sons. 274 p.
15. Blagodatsky SA, Demyanova EG, Kobzeva EI, Kudeyarov VN (2002) Changes in the efficiency of microbial growth upon soil amendment with available substrates. Euras Soil Sci 35: 874-880. (Pubitemid 39547323)
16. 15N-ammonia gas. Soil Biol Biochem 41: 1262-1269.
17. Payne JW (1970) Energy yields and growth of heterotrophs. Annual Reviews in Microbiology 24: 17-52.
18. Thiet RK, Frey SD, Six J (2006) Do growth yield efficiencies differ between soil microbial communities differing in fungal: bacterial ratios? Reality check and methodological issues. Soil Biol Biochem 38: 837-844.
19. Panikov NS, Sizova MV (1996) A kinetic method for estimating the biomass of microbial functional groups in soil. J Microbiol Meth 24: 219-230. (Pubitemid 26060996)
20. Anderson TH, Domsch KH (1985) Maintenance carbon requirements of actively metabolizing microbial populations under in situ conditions. Soil Biol Biochem 17: 197-203.
21. van Bodegom P (2007) Microbial Maintenance: A Critical Review on Its Quantification. Microbial Ecol 53: 513-523.
22. Lipson D, Monson R, Schmidt S, Weintraub M (2009) The trade-off between growth rate and yield in microbial communities and the consequences for under-snow soil respiration in a high elevation coniferous forest. Biogeochem 95: 23-35.
23. Marstorp H, Guan X, Gong P (2000) Relationship between dsDNA, chloroform labile C and ergosterol in soils of different organic matter contents and pH. Soil Biol Biochem 32: 879-882. (Pubitemid 30351677)
24. Blagodatskaya EV, Blagodatskii SA, Anderson TH (2003) Quantitative isolation of microbial DNA from different types of soils from natural and agricultural ecosystems. Mikrobiology 72: 840-846. (Pubitemid 44784867)
25. Joergensen RG, Emmerling C (2006) Methods for evaluating human impact on soil microorganisms based on their activity, biomass, and diversity in agricultural soils. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 169: 295-309. (Pubitemid 44021376)
26. Marstorp H, Witter E (1999) Extractable dsDNA and product formation as measures of microbial growth in soil upon substrate addition. Soil Biol Biochem 31: 1443-1453. (Pubitemid 29347781)
27. Andrews JH, Harris RF (1986) r and K-selection and microbial ecology. In: Marshall KC, editor. Adv Microb Ecol. New York. 99-144.
28. Dorodnikov M, Blagodatskaya E, Blagodatsky S, Fangmeier A, Kuzyakov Y (2009) Stimulation of r- vs. K-selected microorganisms by elevated atmospheric CO2 depends on soil aggregate size. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 69.
29. del Giorgio PA, Cole JJ (1998) Bacterial growth efficiency in natural aquatic systems. Ann Rev Ecol Systematics 29: 503-541.
30. Blagodatskiy SA, Larionova AA, Yevdokimov IV (1993) Effect of mineral nitrogen on the respiration rate and growth efficiency of soil microorganisms. Euras Soil Sci 25: 85-95.
31. Blagodatsky SA, Yevdokimov IV, Larionova AA, Richter J (1998) Microbial growth in soil and nitrogen turnover: Model calibration with laboratory data. Soil Biol Biochem 30: 1757-1764. (Pubitemid 28362283)
32. Rousk J, Bååth E (2007) Fungal and bacterial growth in soil with plant materials of different C/N ratios. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 62: 258-267. (Pubitemid 350076065)
33. Kuzyakov Y, Xu X (2013) Competition between roots and microorganisms for nitrogen: mechanisms and ecological relevance. New Phytologist 198: 656-669.
34. Weigel HJ, Pacholski A, Burkart S, Helal M, Heinemeyer O, et al. (2005) Carbon turnover in a crop rotation under free air CO2 enrichment (FACE). Pedosphere 15: 728-738. (Pubitemid 41767842)
35. Anderson JPE, Domsch KH (1978) A physiological method for the quantative measurement of microbial biomass in soils. Soil Biol Biochem 10: 215-221.
36. Anderson TH, Domsch KH (1986) Carbon assimilation and microbial activity in soil. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde 149: 457-468.
37. Heinemeyer O (1989) Soil microbial biomass and respiration measurements: An automated technique based on infra-red gas analysis. Plant Soil: 191-195.
38. Panikov NS (1995) Microbial Growth Kinetics. London, Glasgow: Chapman and Hall. 378 p.
39. Blagodatsky SA, Blagodatskaya EV, Anderson TH, Weigel HJ (2006) Kinetics of the respiratory response of the soil and rhizosphere microbial communities in a field experiment with an elevated concentration of atmospheric CO2. Euras Soil Sci 39: 290-297. (Pubitemid 44740711)
40. Blagodatsky SA, Heinemeyer O, Richter J (2000) Estimating the active and total soil microbial biomass by kinetic respiration analysis. Biol Fertil Soils 32: 73-81. (Pubitemid 32139508)
41. Wutzler T, Blagodatsky SA, Blagodatskaya E, Kuzyakov Y (2012) Soil microbial biomass and its activity estimated by kinetic respiration analysis - Statistical guidelines. Soil Biol Biochem 45: 102-112.
42. ModelMaker (1997) ModelMaker Version 3.0.3 Software. CherwellScientific Publishing Limited, Oxford.
43. Blagodatskaya EV, Blagodatsky SA, Anderson TH, Kuzyakov Y (2009) Contrasting effects of glucose, living roots and maize straw on microbial growth kinetics and substrate availability in soil. Europ J Soil Sci 60.
44. Christensen H, Bakken LR, Olsen RA (1993) Soil bacterial DNA and biovolume profiles measured by flow-cytometry. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 102: 129-140. (Pubitemid 23114136)
45. Christensen H, Olsen RA, Bakken LR (1995) Flow Cytometric Measurements of Cell Volumes and DNA Contents During Culture of Indigenous Soil Bacteria. Microbial Ecol 29: 49.
46. Panikov NS (2010) Microbial Ecology. Environmental Biotechnology. 121-191.
47. Goddard VJ, Bailey MJ, Darrah P, Lilley AK, Thompson IP (2001) Monitoring temporal and spatial variation in rhizosphere bacterial population diversity: A community approach for the improved selection of rhizosphere competent bacteria. Plant Soil 232: 181-193. (Pubitemid 32643835)
48. Gershenson A, Bader NE, Cheng W (2009) Effects of substrate availability on the temperature sensitivity of soil organic matter decomposition. Global Change Biol 15: 176-183.
49. Pfeiffer T, Schuster S, Bonhoeffer S (2001) Cooperation and competition in the evolution of ATP-producing pathways. Science (Washington D C) 292: 504-507. (Pubitemid 32335953)
50. Hill PW, Farrar JF, Jones DL (2008) Decoupling of microbial glucose uptake and mineralization in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 40: 616-624.
51. Schneckenberger K, Demin D, Stahr K, Kuzyakov Y (2008) Microbial utilization and mineralization of [14C] glucose added in six orders of concentration to soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 40: 1981-1988.
52. Anderson TH (2008) Assessment of DNA contents of soil fungi. Landbauforsch Volkenrode 58: 19-28.
53. Leckie SE, Prescott CE, Grayston SJ, Neufeld JD, Mohn WW (2004) Comparison of chloroform fumigation-extraction, phospholipid fatty acid, and DNA methods to determine microbial biomass in forest humus. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 36: 529-532. (Pubitemid 38215045)
54. Zachow C, Tilcher R, Berg G (2008) Sugar beet-associated bacterial and fungal communities show a high indigenous antagonistic potential against plant pathogens. Microbial Ecol 55: 119-129.