Examining regional variation in the use of cancer screening in Germany

Social Science and Medicine

Volumn 110, Issue , 2014, Pages 74-80

  Vogt, Verena ^a   Siegel, Martin ^a   Sundmacher, Leonie ^b  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cancer screening; Germany; Health care access; Spatial analysis

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; AUTOCORRELATION; CANCER; DISEASE SPREAD; GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH SERVICES; PUBLIC HEALTH; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPILLOVER EFFECT;

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; CAUSE OF DEATH; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; GEOGRAPHY; GERMANY; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PROSTATE CANCER; SKIN CANCER; SOCIAL STRUCTURE; SOCIOECONOMICS; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

GERMANY;

CANCER SCREENING; GERMANY; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

ADULT; AGED; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; GERMANY; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84899562403     PISSN: 02779536     EISSN: 18735347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.033     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Andersen R.M. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter?. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 1995, 36(1):1-10.
2. Anselin L. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models 1988, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston.
3. Anselin L., Griffith D.A. Do spatial effects really matter in regression analysis?. Papers in Regional Science 1988, 65(1):11-34.
4. Anselin L. SpaceStat tutorial: A workbook for using SpaceStat in the analysis of spatial data 1992, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University, West Virginia.
5. Anselin L. The local indicators of spatial association - LISA. Geographical Analysis 1995, 27(2):93-115.
6. Anselin L., Bera A. Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics. Handbook of Applied Economic Statistics 1998, 237-289. Marcel Dekker, New York [etc.]. A. Ullah, D.E.A. Giles (Eds.).
7. Anselin L., Hudak S. Spatial econometrics in practice. Regional Science and Urban Economics 1992, 22(3):509-536.
8. Arbyn M., Anttila A., Jordan J., Ronco G., Schenck U., Segnan N., Wiener H., Herbert A., Daniel J., Karsa L.von European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening 2008, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
9. Atkin W.S., Edwards R., Kralj-Hans I., Wooldrage K., Hart A.R., Northover J.M.A., Parkin D.M., Wardle J., Duffy S.W., Cuzick J. Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010, 375(9726):1624-1633.
10. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: a Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall Series in Social Learning Theory 1986, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
11. Benarroch-Gampel J., Sheffield K.M., Lin Y.-L., Kuo Y.-F., Goodwin J.S., Riall T.S. Colonoscopist and primary care physician supply and disparities in colorectal cancer screening. Health Services Research 2012, 47(3 Pt 1):1137-1157.
12. Benjamins M.R., Kirby J.B., Bond Huie S.A. County characteristics and racial and ethnic disparities in the use of preventive services. Preventive Medicine 2004, 39(4):704-712.
13. Bentham G., Hinton J., Haynes R., Lovett A., Bestwick C. Factors affecting non-response to cervical cytology screening in Norfolk, England. Social Science & Medicine 1995, 40(1):131-135.
14. Social Epidemiology 2000, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford. L.F. Berkman, I. Kawachi (Eds.).
15. Bowman J., Sanson-Fisher R., Boyle C., Pope S., Redman S. Arandomised controlled trial of strategies to prompt attendance for a Pap smear. Journal of Medical Screening 1995, 2(4):211-218.
16. Carrieri V., Bilger M. Preventive care: underused even when free. Is there something else at work?. Applied Economics 2009, 45(2):239-253.
17. Coughlin S.S., King J., Richards T.B., Ekwueme D.U. Cervical cancer screening among women in metropolitan areas of the United States by individual- level and area-based measures of socioeconomic status, 2000 to 2002. Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 2006, 15(11):2154-2159.
18. Coughlin S.S., Leadbetter S., Richards T., Sabatino S.A. Contextual analysis of breast and cervical cancer screening and factors associated with health care access among United States women, 2002. Social Science & Medicine 2008, 66(2):260-275.
19. Datta G.D., Colditz G.A., Kawachi I., Subramanian S.V., Palmer J.R., Rosenberg L. Individual-, neighborhood-, and state-level socioeconomic predictors of cervical carcinoma screening among U.S. black women: a multilevel analysis. Cancer 2006, 106(3):664-669.
20. Destatis Gesundheit - Todesursachen in Deutschland 2012, Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), Wiesbaden.
21. Dupont-Lucas C., Dejardin O., Dancourt V., Launay L., Launoy G., Guittet L. Socio-geographical determinants of colonoscopy uptake after faecal occult blood test. Digestive and Liver Disease 2011, 43(9):714-720.
22. Engelman K.K., Hawley D.B., Gazaway R., Mosier M.C., Ahluwalia J.S., Ellerbeck E.F. Impact of geographic barriers on the utilization of mammograms by older rural women. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2002, 50(1):62-68.
23. Fülop G., Koptesch T., Schöpe P. Bedarfsgerechte Versorgungsplanung. Entwicklung eines Modells zur Bestimmung zwischenstandörtlicher Versorgungsbeziehungen zur Sicherstellung einer flächendeckenden und bedarfsgerechten ambulanten vertragsärztlichen Versorgung. Gesundheits- und Sozialpolitik 2007, 9(10):57-63.
24. Grillo F., Vallée J., Chauvin P. Inequalities in cervical cancer screening for women with or without a regular consulting in primary care for gynaecological health, in Paris, France. Preventive Medicine 2012, 54(3-4):259-265.
25. Hofer T.P., Wolfe R.A., Tedeschi P.J., McMahon L.F., Griffith J.R. Use of community versus individual socioeconomic data in predicting variation in hospital use. Health Services Research 1998, 33(2 Pt 1):243-259.
26. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Cancer-Preventive Strategies Breast Cancer Screening. IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention 2002, vol. 7. IARC Press, Lyon.
27. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Cancer-Preventive Strategies Cervix Cancer Screening. IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention 2005, vol. 10. IARC Press, Lyon.
28. Jensen L.F., Pedersen A.F., Andersen B., Fenger-Gron M., Vedsted P. Distance to screening site and non-participation in screening for breast cancer: a population-based study. Journal of Public Health. Advance online Publication 2013, 10.1093/pubmed/fdt068.
29. Kreuger F.A., van Oers H.A., Nijs H.G. Cervical cancer screening: spatial associations of outcome and risk factors in Rotterdam. Public Health 1999, 113(3):111-115.
30. Krieger N. Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: validation and application of a census-based methodology. American Journal of Public Health 1992, 82(5):703-710.
31. Kroll L., Lampert T. Regionalisierung von Gesundheitsindikatoren. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz 2012, 55(1):129-140.
32. Lairson D.R., Chan W., Newmark G.R. Determinants of the demand for breast cancer screening among women veterans in the United States. Social Science & Medicine 2005, 61(7):1608-1617.
33. Litaker D., Tomolo A. Association of contextual factors and breast cancer screening: finding new targets to promote early detection. Journal of Women's Health 2007, 16(1):36-45.
34. Lyimo F.S., Beran T.N. Demographic, knowledge, attitudinal, and accessibility factors associated with uptake of cervical cancer screening among women in a rural district of Tanzania: three public policy implications. BMC Public Health 2012, 12(1):22.
35. Macedo A., Waller J., Patnik J., Marlow L. Cervical screening uptake, political interest and voter turnout: a population-based survey of women in England. Journal of Medical Screening 2013, 19(4):189-194.
36. McCaffery K. Socioeconomic variation in participation in colorectal cancer screening. Journal of Medical Screening 2002, 9(3):104-108.
37. McPhillips J.B., Eaton C.B., Gans K.M., Derby C.A., Lasater T.M., McKenney J.L., Carleton R.A. Dietary differences in smokers and nonsmokers from two southeastern New England communities. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 1994, 94(3):287-292.
38. Moyer V.A. Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Annals of Internal Medicine 2012, 157(2):120.
39. Neilson A.R., Whynes D.K. Determinants of persistent compliance with screening for colorectal cancer. Social Science & Medicine 1995, 41(3):365-374.
40. Ozegowski S., Sundmacher L. Ensuring access to health care-Germany reforms supply structures to tackle inequalities. Health Policy 2012, 106(2):105-109.
41. Perkins K.A., Rohay J., Meilahn E.N., Wing R.R., Matthews K.A., Kuller L.H. Diet, alcohol, and physical activity as a function of smoking status in middle-aged women. Health Psychology Official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association 1993, 12(5):410-415.
42. Perry N., Broeders M., Wolf C.de, Törnberg S., Holland R., Karsa L.von European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis 2006, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
43. Pruitt S.L., Shim M.J., Mullen P.D., Vernon S.W., Amick B.C. Association of area socioeconomic status and breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 2009, 18(10):2579-2599.
44. Putnam R.D. Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy 1995, 6(1):65-78.
45. Rahman S.M.M., Dignan M.B., Shelton B.J. Factors influencing adherence to guidelines for screening mammography among women aged 40 years and older. Ethnicity & Disease 2003, 13(4):477-484.
46. Rakowski W., Clark M.A., Ehrich B. Smoking and cancer screening for women ages 42-75: associations in the 1990-1994 National Health Interview Surveys. Preventive Medicine 1999, 29(6 Pt 1):487-495.
47. RKI Gesundheit in Deutschland 2006, Statistisches Bundesamt, Berlin.
48. Roetzheim R.G., Pal N., Gonzalez E.C., Ferrante J.M., van Durme D.J., Ayanian J.Z., Krischer J.P. The effects of physician supply on the early detection of colorectal cancer. The Journal of Family Practice 1999, 48(11):850-858.
49. Rückinger S., Kries R.V., Pauli S., Munte A., Mielck A. Die Krebsfrüherkennungsuntersuchung für Frauen wird in Regionen mit niedrigerem Haushaltseinkommen seltener in Anspruch genommen - Analyse von Daten der Kassenärztlichen Vereinigung Bayerns. Das Gesundheitswesen 2008, 70(7):393-397.
50. Sabates R., Feinstein L. The role of education in the uptake of preventative health care: the case of cervical screening in Britain. Social Science & Medicine 2006, 62(12):2998-3010.
51. Segnan N., Patnick J., Karsa L.von European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Colorectal cancer Screening and Diagnosis 2010, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
52. Soneji S., Armstrong K., Asch D.A. Socioeconomic and physician supply determinants of racial disparities in colorectal cancer screening. Journal of Oncology Practice 2012, 8(5):e125.
53. Taplin S.H., Anderman C., Grothaus L., Curry S., Montano D. Using physician correspondence and postcard reminders to promote mammography use. American Journal of Public Health 1994, 84(4):571-574.
54. U.S.Department of Health and Human Services Healthy People 2020 2013, http://healthypeople.gov/2020/.
55. U.S.Preventive Services Task Force Screening for skin cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Annals of Internal Medicine 2009, 150(3):188-193.
56. Vallée J., Cadot E., Grillo F., Parizot I., Chauvin P. The combined effects of activity space and neighbourhood of residence on participation in preventive health-care activities: the case of cervical screening in the Paris metropolitan area (France). Health & Place 2010, 16(5):838-852.
57. Waller J., Bartoszek M., Marlow L., Wardle J. Barriers to cervical cancer screening attendance in England: a population-based survey. Journal of Medical Screening 2009, 16(4):199-204.
58. Ward M.D., Gleditsch K.S. Spatial Regression Models. Sage University Papers Series. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences 2008, vol. 155. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
59. Weiss J.M., Smith M.A., Pickhardt P.J., Kraft S.A., Flood G.E., Kim D.H., Strutz E., Pfau P.R. Predictors of colorectal cancer screening variation among primary-care providers and clinics. The American Journal of Gastroenterology 2013, 108(7):1159-1167.
60. Wells B.L., Horm J.W. Targeting the underserved for breast and cervical cancer screening: the utility of ecological analysis using the national health interview survey. American Journal of Public Health 1998, 88(10):1484-1489.
61. WHO The Global Burden of Disease, 2004 Update 2008, World Health Organization, Geneva.