A large scale (N=102) functional neuroimaging study of error processing in a Go/NoGo task

Behavioural Brain Research

Volumn 268, Issue , 2014, Pages 127-138

  Steele, Vaughn R ^a,b   Claus, Eric D ^a   Aharoni, Eyal ^a,b   Harenski, Carla ^a   Calhoun, Vince D ^a,b,c   Pearlson, Godfrey ^c,d   Kiehl, Kent A ^a,b  

^a MIND RESEARCH NETWORK   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d INSTITUTE OF LIVING   (United States)

Author keywords

Error processing; FMRI; Go NoGo; Response inhibition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANTERIOR CINGULATE; ARTICLE; BILATERAL INFERIOR FRONTAL GYRUS; BRAIN FUNCTION; COHORT ANALYSIS; ERROR PROCESSING; FEMALE; FRONTAL GYRUS; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEFT LATERAL PREFRONTAL AREA; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; MENTAL TASK; NERVE POTENTIAL; NORMAL HUMAN; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SUBTHALAMIC NUCLEUS; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MIDDLE AGED; NERVE TRACT; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TASK PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEURAL PATHWAYS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84899554341     PISSN: 01664328     EISSN: 18727549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Steele V.R., Aharoni E., Munro G.E., Calhoun V.D., Nyalakanti P., Stevens M.C., et al. A large scale (N=102) functional neuroimaging study of response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task. Behav Brain Res 2013, 256:529-536.
2. Niendam T.A., Laird A.R., Ray K.L., Dean Y.M., Glahn D.C., Carter C.S. Meta-analytic evidence for a superordinate cognitive control network subserving diverse executive functions. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2012, 12:241-268.
3. Kiehl K.A., Liddle P.F., Hopfinger J.B. Error processing and the rostral anterior cingulate: an event-related fMRI study. Psychophysiology 2000, 37:216-223.
4. Simmonds D.J., Pekar J.J., Mostofsky S.H. Meta-analysis of Go/No-go tasks demonstrating that fMRI activation associated with response inhibition is task-dependent. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:224-232.
5. Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Gray J.R., Molfese D.L., Snyder A. Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: effects of frequency, inhibition, and errors. Cereb Cortex 2001, 11:825-836.
6. Horn N.R., Dolan M., Elliott R., Deakin J.F.W., Woodruff P.W.R. Response inhibition and impulsivity: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41:1959-1966.
7. Liddle P.F., Kiehl K.A., Smith A.M. Event-related fMRI study of response inhibition. Hum Brain Mapp 2001, 12:100-109.
8. Schulz K.P., Fan J., Tang C.Y., Newcorn J.H., Buchsbaum M.S., Cheung A.M., et al. Response inhibition in adolescents diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder during childhood: an event-related fMRI study. Am J Psychiatry 2004, 161:1650-1657.
9. Aron A.R., Robbins T.W., Poldrack R.A. Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends Cogn Sci 2004, 8:170-177.
10. Garavan H., Ross T.J., Stein E.A. Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999, 96:8301-8306.
11. Garavan H., Ross T.J., Murphy K., Roche R.A.P., Stein E.A. Dissociable executive functions in the dynamic control of behavior: inhibition, error detection, and correction. Neuroimage 2002, 17:1820-1829.
12. Mathalon D.H., Whitfield S.L., Ford J.M. Anatomy of an error: ERP and fMRI. Biol Psychol 2003, 64:119-141.
13. McNab F., Leroux G., Strand F., Thorell L., Bergman S., Klingberg T. Common and unique components of inhibition and working memory: an fMRI, within-subjects investigation. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:2668-2682.
14. Menon V., Adleman N.E., White C.D., Glover G.H., Reiss A.L. Error-related brain activation during a Go/NoGo response inhibition task. Hum Brain Mapp 2001, 12:131-143.
15. Wager T.D., Sylvester C.Y., Lacey S.C., Nee D.E., Franklin M., Jonides J. Common and unique components of response inhibition revealed by fMRI. Neuroimage 2005, 27:323-340.
16. Mostofsky S.H., Schafer J.G.B., Abrams M.T., Goldberg M.C., Flower A.A., Boyce A., et al. fMRI evidence that the neural basis of response inhibition is task-dependent. Cogn Brain Res 2003, 17:419-430.
17. Garavan H., Ross T.J., Kaufman J., Stein E.A. A midline dissociation between error-processing and response-conflict monitoring. Neuroimage 2003, 20:1132-1139.
18. Tian Y., Yao D. A study on the neural mechanism of inhibition of return by the event-related potential in the Go/NoGo task. Biol Psychol 2008, 79:171-178.
19. Aron A.R. The neural basis of inhibition in cognitive control. Neuroscientist 2007, 13:214-228.
20. Bekker E.M., Kenemans J.L., Verbaten M.N. Source analysis of the N2 in a cued Go/NoGo task. Cogn Brain Res 2005, 22:221-231.
21. Garavan H., Hester R., Murphy K., Fassbender C., Kelly C. Individual differences in the functional neuroanatomy of inhibitory control. Brain Res 2006, 1105:130-142.
22. Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Gray J.R., Molfese D.L., Snyder A. Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: effects of frequency, inhibition and errors. Cereb Cortex 2001, 11:825-836.
23. Garavan H., Ross T.J., Murphy K., Roche R.A.P., Stein E.A. Dissociable executive functions in the dynamic control of behavior: inhibition, error detection, and correction. NeuroImage 2002, 17:1820-1829.
24. Horn N.R., Dolan M., Deakin J.F.W., Woodruff P.W.R. Response inhibition and impulsivity: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41:1959-1966.
25. Kiehl K.A., Smith A.M., Hare R.D., Liddle P.F. An event-related potential investigation of response inhibition in schizophrenia and psychopathy. Biol Psychiatry 2000, 48:210-221.
26. Liddle P.F., Kiehl K.A., Smith A.M. Event-related fMRI study of response inhibition. Hum Brain Mapp 2001, 12:100-109.
27. Menon V., Adleman N.E., White C.D., Glover G.H., Reiss A.L. Error-related brain activation during a Go/No-go response inhibition task. Hum Brain Mapp 2001, 12:131-143.
28. Holroyd C.B., Coles M.G.H. The neural basis of human error-processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine and the error-related negativity. Psychol Rev 2002, 109:679-709.
29. Carter C.S., Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Botvinick M., Noll D., Cohen J.D. Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science 1998, 280:747-749.
30. Holroyd C.B., Nieuwenhuis S., Yeung N., Nystrom L., Mars R.B., Coles M.G., et al. Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex shows fMRI response to internal and external error signals. Nat Neurosci 2004, 7:497-498.
31. Ullsperger M., von Cramon D.Y. Subprocesses of performance monitoring: a dissociation of error processing and response competition revealed by event-related fMRI and ERPs. Neuroimage 2001, 14:1387-1401.
32. Stevens M.C., Kiehl K.A., Pearlson G.D., Calhoun V.D. Brain network dynamics during error commission. Hum Brain Mapp 2009, 30:24-37.
33. Stevens M.C., Kiehl K.A., Pearlson G.D., Calhoun V.D. Functional neural networks underlying response inhibition in adolescents and adults. Behav Brain Res 2007, 181:12-22.
34. Holroyd C.B., Coles M.G.H. The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychol Rev 2002, 109:679-709.
35. Edwards B.G., Calhoun V.D., Kiehl K.A. Joint ICA of ERP and fMRI during error-monitoring. Neuroimage 2012, 59:1896-1903.
36. Devinsky O., Morrell M.J., Vogt B.A. Contributions of anterior cingulate to behaviour. Brain 1995, 188:279-306.
37. Polli F.E., Barton J.J., Cain M.S., Thakkar K.N., Rauch S.L., Manoach D.S. Rostral and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex make dissociable contributions during antisaccade error commission. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102:15700-15705.
38. Falkenstein M., Hielscher H., Dziobeck I., Schwarzenau P., Hoorman J., Sundermann B., et al. Action monitoring, error detection, and the basal ganglia: an ERP study. Neuroreport 2001, 12:157-161.
39. Gehring W.J., Knight R.T. Prefrontal-cingulate interactions in action monitoring. Nat Neurosci 2000, 3:516-520.
40. Ullsperger M., von Cramon D.Y. The role of intact frontostriatal circuits in error processing. J Cogn Neurosci 2006, 18:651-664.
41. Ullsperger M., von Cramon D.Y., Müller N.G. Interactions of frontal cortical lesions with error processing: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Neuropsychology 2002, 16:548-561.
42. Kiehl K.A., Stevens M.C., Laurens K.R., Pearlson G., Calhoun V.D., Liddle P.F. An adaptive reflexive processing model of neurocognitive function: supporting evidence from a large scale (n=100) fMRI study of an auditory oddball task. Neuroimage 2005, 25:899-915.
43. Murphy K., Garavan H. An empirical investigation into the number of subjects required for an event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage 2004, 22:879-885.
44. Bellgrove M.A., Hester R., Garavan H. The functional neuroanatomical correlates of response variability: evidence from a response inhibition task. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42:1910-1916.
45. Rubia K., Smith A.B., Woolley J., Nosarti C., Heyman I., Taylor E., et al. Progressive increase of frontostriatal brain activation from childhood to adulthood during event-related tasks of cognitive control. Hum Brain Mapp 2006, 27:973-993.
46. First M.B., Spitzer R.L., Gibbon M.W.J.B., Williams J.B.W. Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I (SCID-I), clinician version 1997, American Psychiatric Press, Washington, DC.
47. Freire L., Mangin J.F. Motion correction algorithms may create spurious brain activations in the absence of subject motion. Neuroimage 2001, 14:709-722.
48. Freire L., Roche A., Mangin J.F. What is the best similarity measure for motion correction in fMRI time series. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2002, 21:470-484.
49. Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging UCL.
50. Friston K.J., Holmes A.P., Worsley K.J., Poline J-P., Frith C.D., Frackowiak R.S.J. Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach. Hum Brain Mapp 1994, 2:189-210.
51. Calhoun V.D., Stevens M.C., Pearlson G.D., Kiehl K.A. fMRI analysis with the general linear model: removal of latency-induced amplitude bias by incorporation of hemodynamic derivative terms. Neuroimage 2004, 22:252-257.
52. Danielmeier C., Ullsperger M. Post-error adjustments. Front Psychol 2011, 2:1-10.
53. Braet W., Johnson K.A., Tobin C.T., Acheson R., Bellgrove M.A., Robertson I.H., et al. Functional developmental changes underlying response inhibition and error-detection processes. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:3143-3151.
54. Hirose S., Chikazoe J., Jimura K., Yamashita K., Miyashita Y., Konishi S. Sub-centimeter scale functional organization in human inferior frontal gyrus. Neuroimage 2009, 47:442-450.
55. Chambers C.D., Bellgrove M.A., Gould I.C., English T., Garavan H., McNaught E., et al. Dissociable mechanisms of cognitive control in prefrontal and premotor cortex. J Neurophysiol 2007, 98:3638-3647.
56. Chambers C.D., Garavan H., Bellgrove M.A. Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2009, 33:631-646.
57. Chikazoe J., Konishi S., Asari T., Jimura K., Miyashita Y. Activation of right inferior frontal gyrus during response inhibition across response modalities. J Cogn Neurosci 2007, 19:69-80.
58. Aron A.R., Durston S., Eagle D.M., Logan G.D., Stinear C.M., Stuphorn V. Converging evidence for a fronto-basal-ganglia network for inhibitory control of action and cognition. J Neurosci 2007, 27:11860-11864.
59. Aron A.R., Poldrack R.A. Cortical and subcortical contributions to stop signal response inhibition: role of the subthalamic nucleus. J Neurosci 2006, 26:2424-2433.
60. Durston S., Thomas K.M., Yang Y., Ulug A.M., Zimmerman R.D., Casey B.J. A neural basis for the development of inhibitory control. Dev Sci 2002, 5:F9-F16.
61. Casey B.J., Castellanos F.X., Giedd J.E., Marsh W.L., Hamburger S.D., Schubert A.B., et al. Implication of the right frontostriatal circuitry in response inhibition and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1997, 36:374-383.
62. Gauggel S., Rieger M., Feghoff T.A. Inhibition of ongoing responses in patients with Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004, 75:539-544.
63. Rieger M., Gauggel S., Burmeister K. Inhibition of ongoing responses following frontal, nonfrontal, and basal ganglia lesions. Neuropsychology 2003, 17:272-282.
64. Thoma P., Koch B., Heyder K., Schwarz M., Daum I. Subcortical contributions to multitasking and response inhibition. Behav Brain Res 2008, 194:214-222.
65. Fassbender C., Simoes-Franklin C., Murphy K., Hester R., Meaney J., Robertson I.H., et al. The role of a right fronto-parietal network in cognitive control. J Psychophysiol 2006, 20:286-296.
66. Kerns J.G., Cohen J.D., MacDonald A.W., Cho R.Y., Stenger V.A., Carter C.S. Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science 2004, 303:1023-1026.
67. King J.A., Korb F.M., von Cramon D.Y., Ullsperger M. Post-error behavioral adjustments are facilitated by activation and suppression of task-relevant and task-irrelevant information processing. J Neurosci 2010, 30:12759-12769.
68. Ramautar J.R., Slagter H.A., Kok A., Ridderinkhof K.R. Probability effects in the stop-signal paradigm: the insula and the significance of failed inhibition. Brain Res 2006, 1105:143-154.
69. Hester R., Fassbender C., Garavan H. Individual differences in error processing: a review and reanalysis of three event-related fMRI studies using the Go/NoGo task. Cereb Cortex 2004, 14:986-994.
70. de Bruijn E.R., Miedl S.F., Bekkering H. Fast responders have blinders on: ERP correlates of response inhibition in competition. Cortex 2008, 44:580-586.
71. Cavanna A.E. The precuneus and consciousness. CNS Spectr 2007, 12:545-552.
72. Cavanna A.E., Trimble M.R. The precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. Brain 2006, 129:564-583.
73. Shulman G.L., Fiez J.A., Corbetta M., Buckner R.L., Miezin F.M., Raichle M.E., et al. Common blood flow changes across visual tasks: II. Decreases in cerebral cortex. J Cogn Neurosci 1997, 9:648-663.
74. Wagner A.D., Shannon B.J., Kahn I., Buckner R.L. Parietal lobe contributions to episodic memory deficits. Trends Cogn Sci 2005, 9:445-453.
75. Aron A.R. From reactive to proactive and selective control: developing a richer model for stopping inappropriate responses. Biol Psychiatry 2011, 69:55-68.
76. Hajcak G., Moser J.S., Yeung N., Simons R.F. On the ERN and the significance of errors. Psychophysiology 2005, 42:151-160.
77. Nielson K.A., Langenecker S.A., Ross T.J., Garavan H., Rao S.M., Stein E.A. Comparability of functional MRI response in young and old during inhibition. Neuroreport 2004, 15:129-133.
78. Calhoun V.D., Maciejewski P.K., Pearlson G.D., Kiehl K.A. Temporal lobe and default hemodynamic brain modes discriminate between schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Hum Brain Mapp 2008, 29:1265-1275.
79. Bokura H., Yamaguchi S., Kobayashi S. Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task. Clin Neurophysiol 2001, 112:2224-2232.
80. Calhoun V.D., Adali T., Pearlson G.D., Kiehl K.A. Neuronal chronometry of target detection: fusion of hemodynamic and event-related potential data. Neuroimage 2006, 30:544-553.