Application of two bacterial strains for wastewater bioremediation and assessment of phenolics biodegradation

Environmental Technology (United Kingdom)

Volumn 35, Issue 14, 2014, Pages 1802-1810

  Paisio, Cintia E ^a   Quevedo, María R ^a   Talano, Melina A ^a   González, Paola S ^a   Agostini, Elizabeth ^a  

^a DEPARTAMENTO DE QUÍMICA   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Bacteria; Bioremediation; Biotreatment; Phenolic compounds; Wastewater

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA; BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; BIODEGRADATION; BIOREMEDIATION; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; PHENOLS; POLLUTION; SEWAGE; WASTEWATER;

BIOLOGICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; BIOTECHNOLOGICAL TOOLS; BIOTREATMENTS; EFFICIENT TREATMENT; INDUSTRIAL EFFLUENT; PHENOL CONCENTRATION; PHENOLIC COMPOUNDS; WASTE WATER BIOREMEDIATION;

EFFLUENTS;

2,4 DINITROPHENOL; 2,4,6 TRICHLOROPHENOL; 4 CHLOROPHENOL; 4 NITROPHENOL; DICHLOROPHENOL; GUAIACOL; INDUSTRIAL EFFLUENT; PENTACHLOROPHENOL; PHENOL DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ASSESSMENT METHOD; BACTERIUM; BIODEGRADATION; BIOREMEDIATION; CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); DETOXIFICATION; EFFLUENT; PHENOLIC COMPOUND; WASTEWATER;

ACINETOBACTER; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; BIOREMEDIATION; CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; LEATHER INDUSTRY; RHODOCOCCUS ERYTHROPOLIS; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT;

ACINETOBACTER SP.; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); RHODOCOCCUS SP.;

ACINETOBACTER; BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; BIOLOGICAL OXYGEN DEMAND ANALYSIS; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; PHENOLS; RHODOCOCCUS; TANNING; WASTE WATER; WATER PURIFICATION;

EID: 84899553603     PISSN: 09593330     EISSN: 1479487X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2014.882994     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Barreto-Rodrigues M, Aguiar CM, da Cunha, MA. Biotreatment of an effluent from a wood laminate industry using Lentinula edodes UEC 2019. J Hazard Mater. 2009;164: 1556-1560.
2. Tare V, Gupta S, Bose P. Case studies on biological treatment of tannery effluents in India. J AirWaste Manag Assoc. 2003;53: 976-982.
3. Kumaran P, Paruchuri YL. Kinetics of phenol biotransformation. Water Res 1997;31: 11-22.
4. Barco-Bonilla N, Romero-González R, Plaza-Bolaños P, MartínezVidal JL, Castro AJ, Martín I, Salas JJ, Frenich AG. Priority organic compounds in wastewater effluents from the Mediterranean and Atlantic basins of Andalusia (Spain). Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2013;15: 2194-2203.
5. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Phenol: ambient water quality criteria. Washington, DC: Office of Planning and Standards, Environmental Protection Agency; 1979. p. 296-786.
6. ATSDR-Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. (2008). [Internet]. Available from: http://www.atsdr.cdc. gov/toxprofiles/Q5tp115.html
7. Olukanni OD, Osuntoki AA, Gbenle GO. Textile effluent biodegradation potentials of textile effluent-adapted and nonadapted bacteria. Afr J Biotechnol. 2006;5: 1980-1984.
8. Hasegawa MC, Barbosa AM, Takashima K. Biotreatment of industrial tannery wastewater using Botryosphaeria rhodina. J Serb Chem Soc. 2011;76: 439-446.
9. Aggelis G, Iconomou D, Christou M, Bokas D, Kotzailias S, Christou G, Tsagou V, Papanikolaou S. Phenolic removal in a model olive oil mill wastewater using Pleurotus ostreatus in bioreactor cultures and biological evaluation of the process. Water Res. 2003;373: 3897-3904.
10. Dias-Machado M, Madeira LM, Nogales B, Nunes OC, Manaia CM. Treatment of cork boiling wastewater using chemical oxidation and biodegradation. Chemosphere. 2006;64: 455-461.
11. Cordova-Rosa SM, Dams RI, Cordova-Rosa EV, Radetski MR, Corrêa AX, Radetski CM. Remediation of phenolcontaminated soil by a bacterial consortium and Acinetobacter calcoaceticus isolated from an industrial wastewater treatment plant. J Hazard Mater. 2009;164: 61-66.
12. Faouzi M, Merzouki M, Benlemlih M. Contribution to optimize the biological treatment of synthetic tannery effluent by the sequencing batch reactor. J Mater Environ Sci. 2013;4: 532-541.
13. Paisio CE, Talano MA, González PS, Busto VD, Rodríguez Talou J, Agostini E. Isolation and characterization of a Rhodococcus strain with phenol-degrading ability and its potential use for tannery effluent biotreatment. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2012;19: 3430-3439.
14. Paisio CE, Talano MA, González PS, Pajuelo-Domínguez E, Agostini E. Characterization of a phenol-degrading bacterium isolated from an industrial effluent and its potential application for bioremediation. Environ Technol. 2013;34: 485-493.
15. Ren S, Frymier PD. Toxicity estimation of phenolic compounds by bioluminescent bacterium. J Environ Eng-ASCE. 2003;129: 328-335.
16. Li JK, Humphrey AE. Kinetic and fluorimetric behaviour of a phenol fermentation. Biotechnol Lett. 1989;11: 177-182.
17. Gurujeyalakshmi G, Oriel P. Isolation of phenol-metabolizing enzymes in Trichosporon cutaneum. Arch Microbiol. 1989;130: 54-58.
18. APHA-Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 20th ed. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 1998. Available from: http://www. standardmethods.org
19. Wright H, Nicell JA. Characterization of soybean peroxidase for wastewater treatment. Biores Technol. 1999;70: 69-79.
20. Kim MH, Hao OJ. Cometabolic degradation of chlorophenols by Acinetobacter species. Water Res. 1999;33: 562-574.
21. Hao OJ, Kim MH, Seagren EA, Kim H. Kinetics of phenol and chlorophenol utilization by Acinetobacter species. Chemosphere. 2002;46: 797-807.
22. Goswami M, Shivaraman N, Singh RP. Kinetics of chlorophenol degradation by benzoate-induced culture of Rhodococcus erythropolis M1. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002;18: 779-783.
23. Kitova AE, Kuvichkina TN, Arinbasarova AI, Reshetilov AN. Degradation of 2, 4-dinitrophenol by free and immobilized cells of Rhodococcus erythropolis HL PM-1. Prikl Biokhim Mikrobiol. 2004;40: 307-311.
24. Gemini VL, Gallego A, de Oliveira VM, Gomez CE, Manfio GP, Korol SE. Biodegradation and detoxification of p-nitrophenol by Rhodococcus wratislaviensis. Int Biodet Biodeg. 2005;55: 103-108.
25. Pamukoglu MY, Kargi F. Biodegradation kinetics of 2, 4, 6- trichlorophenol by Rhodococcus rhodochrous in batch culture. Enz Microbial Technol. 2008;43: 43-47.
26. Durai G, Rajasimman M. Biological treatment of tannery wastewater - a review. J Environ Sci Technol. 2011;4: 1-17.
27. Ley Nacional Argentina No 24.051 Decreto 831/93. Reglamentación de Residuos Peligrosos [Internet]. Available from: http://www.cecopal.org/ dereccho/DNacional/ DN-831-93.htm
28. Essam T, Amin MA, El Tayeb O, Mattiasson B, Guieysse B. Biological treatment of industrial wastes in a photobioreactor. Water Sci Technol. 2006;53: 117-125.
29. Oller I, Malato S, Sánchez-Pérez JA. Combination of advanced oxidation processes and biological treatments for wastewater decontamination - a review. Sci Total Environ. 2011;409: 4141-4166.
30. Krastanov A, Alexieva Z, Yemendzhiev H. Microbial degradation of phenol and phenolic derivatives. Eng Life Sci. 2013;13: 76-87.
31. Ojumu TV, Bello OO, Sonibare JA, Solomon BO. Evaluation of microbial systems for bioremediation of petroleum refinery effluents in Nigeria. Afr J Biotechnol. 2005;4: 31-35.
32. Nair IC, Jayachandran K, Shashidhar S. Treatment of paper factory effluent using a phenol degrading Alcaligenes sp. under free and immobilized conditions. Biores Technol. 2007;98: 714-716.
33. Omer AM. Production of organic biofertilizer fromolive mill waste water. Australian J Basic Appl Sci. 2012;6: 654-663.
34. Srivastava S, Ahmad AH, Thakur IS. Removal of chromium and pentachlorophenol from tannery effluents. Biores Technol. 2007;98: 1128-1132.
35. Chandra R, Bharagava RN, Kapley A, Purohit HJ. Bacterial diversity, organic pollutants and their metabolites in two aeration lagoons of common effluent treatment plant (CETP) during the degradation and detoxification of tannery wastewater. Biores Technol. 2011;102: 2333-2341.
36. Begoña Prieto M, Hidalgo A, Serra JL, Llama MJ. Degradation of phenol by Rhodococcus erythropolis UPV-1 immobilized on Biolite® in a packed-bed reactor. J Biotechnol. 2002;97: 1-11.
37. Buljan J, Bosnic M. Pollution limits for discharge of tannery effluents into water bodies and sewers. World Leather. 1994;54-60.
38. Ley No 20.324. Disposición 79179/90. Obras Sanitarias de la Nación. Argentina.
39. Jayachandran K, Suresh PV, Chandrasekaran M. A novel Acinetobacter sp. for treating highly acidic rubber latex centrifugation effluent. Biotechnol Lett. 1994;16: 649-654.
40. Rosli NHBM. Development of biological treatment system for reduction of cod from textile wastewater [master dissertation]. Faculty of Science, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia; 2006.
41. Sivaprakasam S, Mahadevan S, Sekar S, Rajakumar S. Biological treatment of tannery wastewater by using salttolerant bacterial strains. Microb Cell Fact. 2008;7: 1-7.
42. Subramani T, Haribalaji D. Biodegradation of tannery effluent and designing the reactor for clarifier and activated sludge process. Int J Modern Eng Res. 2012;2: 774-781.
43. Gidhamaari S, Boominathan, Mamidala E. Studies of efficiency of immobilized bacteria in tannery effluent treatment. J Bio Innov. 2012;2: 33-42.
44. Hidalgo A, Jaureguibeitia A, Begoña Prieto M, Rodríguez- Fernández C, Serra JL, Llama MJ. Biological treatment of phenolic industrial wastewaters by Rhodococcus erythropolis UPV-1. Enz Microb Technol. 2002;31: 221-226.
45. Hozzein WN, Ahmed MB, Tawab MS. Efficiency of some Actinomycete isolates in biological treatment and removal of heavy metals from wastewater. Afr J Biotechnol. 2012;11: 1163-1168.