Design and perceptibility of a wearable haptic device using low-frequency stimulations on the forearm

IEEE Haptics Symposium, HAPTICS

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 505-508

  Erwin, Andrew ^a   Sup, Frank ^b  

^a RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

Haptic feedback; myoelectric prosthetics; sensory substitution

Indexed keywords

HAPTIC INTERFACES; MAGNETS;

HAPTIC DEVICES; HAPTIC FEEDBACK DEVICES; HAPTIC FEEDBACKS; PLASTIC COMPONENTS; PROTOTYPE DEVICES; SENSORY SUBSTITUTION; STIMULATION PATTERN; TACTILE STIMULATION;

PROSTHETICS;

EID: 84899513872     PISSN: 23247347     EISSN: 23247355     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HAPTICS.2014.6775507     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. C. Antfolk, C. Balkenius, G. Lundborg, B. Rosen, and F. Sebelius. Design and technical construction of a tactile display for sensory feedback in a hand prosthesis system. Biomed. Eng., 50(9):1-9, 2010.
2. D. J. Atkins, D. C. Y. Heard, and W. H. Donovan. Epidemiologic overview of individuals with upper-limb loss and their reported research priorities. J. Prosthet. Orthot., 8(1):2-11, 1996.
3. K. Bark, J. Wheeler, P. Shull, J. Savall, and M. Cutkosky. Rotational skin stretch feedback: A wearable haptic display for motion. IEEE Trans. Haptics, 3(3):166-176, July 2010.
4. J. Biggs and M. A. Srinivasan. Tangential versus normal displacements of skin: Relative effectiveness for producing tactile sensations. In Proc. 10th Symp. on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environ. and Teleoperator Syst., pages 121-128. IEEE Comput. Soc, 2002.
5. R. W. Cholewiak and A. A. Collins. Vibrotactile localization on the arm: Effects of place, space, and age. Perception &Psychophysics, 65(7):1058-77, 2003.
6. D. D. Damian, M. Ludersdorfer, A. H. Arieta, R. Pfeifer, and A. M. Okamura. Wearable haptic device for cutaneous force and slip speed display. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. and Autom., pages 1038-1043, 2012.
7. J. Y. C. Ng and J. C. F. Man. Vibro-Monitor: A vibrotactile display for physiological data monitoring. Human Interface Technol., 2004.
8. C. Pylatiuk, A. Kargov, and S. Schulz. Design and evaluation of a low-cost force feedback system for myoelectric prosthetic hands. J. Prosthet. Orthot., 18(2):57-61, Apr. 2006.
9. C. Pylatiuk, S. Schulz, and L. Doderlein. Results of an internet survey of myoelectric prosthetic hand users. J. Prosthet. Orthot. Int., 31(4):362-370, 2007.
10. R. N. Scott, R. H. Brittain, R. R. Caldwell, A. B. Cameron, and V. A. Dunfield. Sensory-feedback system compatible with myoelectric control. Med. &Bio. Eng. &Comp., 18(1):65-9, 1980.
11. G. F. Shannon. Characteristics of a transducer for tactile displays. Biomed. Eng., 9(6):247-249, 1974.
12. G. F. Shannon. A comparison of alternative means of providing sensory feedback on upper limb amputees. Med. Biol. Eng., 14(3):289-294, 1976.
13. N. Staff. Amputation statistics by cause limb loss in the United States. Physiol. Med. and Rehabil., pages 1-3, 2008.
14. Z. Szabo, M. Ganji, and E. T. Enikov. Development of voice-coil micro-actuator for 3-D virtual tactile displays. In Proc. ASME 2011 IMECE, pages 1-7, 2011.
15. A. van Lunteren, G. H. van Lunteren-Gerritsen, H. G. Stassen, and M. J. Zuithoff. A field evaluation of arm prostheses for unilateral amputees. J. Prosthet. Orthot., 7(3):141-51, 1983.
16. J. Wheeler, K. Bark, J. Savall, and M. Cutkosky. Investigation of rotational skin stretch for proprioceptive feedback with application to myoelectric systems. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., 18(1):58-66, 2010.