Motor recovery patterns in arm muscles: Coupled bilateral training and neuromuscular stimulation

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Kang, Nyeonju ^a   Idica, Jerelyne ^a   Amitoj, Bhullar ^a   Cauraugh, James H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Coupled bilateral movements and neuromuscular stimulation; EMG Activation patterns; Motor recovery; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ABDUCTION; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARM MUSCLE; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; ELBOW; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FINGER; FORCE; HUMAN; JOINT FUNCTION; MALE; MOTOR CONTROL; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLE STIMULATOR; MUSCLE STRENGTH; MUSCLE TRAINING; NERVE STIMULATION; NEUROMUSCULAR STIMULATION; SHOULDER; VOLUNTEER; WRIST; ARM; ELECTROSTIMULATION THERAPY; KINESIOTHERAPY; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SKELETAL MUSCLE;

AGED; ARM; ELECTRIC STIMULATION THERAPY; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; STROKE;

EID: 84899502079     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-57     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Motor compensation and recovery for reaching in stroke patients. Roby-Brami A, Feydy A, Combeaud M, Biryukova EV, Bussel B, Levin MF, Acta Neurologica Scand 2003 107 369 381 10.1034/j.1600-0404.2003.00021.x
2. Neurorehabilitation with new functional electrical stimulation for hemiparetic upper extremity in stroke patients. Hara Y, J Nippon Med Sch 2008 75 4 14 10.1272/jnms.75.4 18360073
3. Upper extremity improvements in chronic stroke: coupled bilateral load training. Cauraugh JH, Coombes SA, Lodha N, Naik SK, Summers JJ, Restor Neurol Neurosci 2009 27 17 25 19164850
4. Chronic stroke longitudinal motor improvements: cumulative learning evidence found in the upper extremity. Cauraugh JH, Kim SB, Summers JJ, Cerebrovasc Dis 2008 25 115 121 10.1159/000112321 18073464
5. Long-term rehabilitation for chronic stroke arm movements: a randomized controlled trial. Cauraugh JH, Naik SK, Lodha N, Coombes SA, Summers JJ, Clin Rehabil 2011 25 1086 1096 10.1177/0269215511410580 21788265
6. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for skeletal muscle function. Doucet BM, Lam A, Griffin L, Yale J Biol Med 2012 85 201 215 22737049
7. Coupled bilateral movements and active neuromuscular stimulation: intralimb transfer evidence during bimanual aiming. Cauraugh JH, Kim SB, Duley A, Neurosci Lett 2005 382 39 44 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.02.060 15911118
8. Force control improvements in chronic stroke: bimanual coordination and motor synergy evidence after coupled bimanual movement training. Kang N, Cauraugh JH, Exp Brain Res 2014 232 503 513 10.1007/s00221-013-3758-z 24212257
9. The bliss (not the problem) of motor abundance (not redundancy). Latash ML, Exp Brain Res 2012 217 1 5 10.1007/s00221-012-3000-4 22246105
10. Motor control strategies revealed in the structure of motor variability. Latash ML, Scholz JP, Schoner G, Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2002 30 26 31 10.1097/00003677-200201000-00006 11800496
11. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR, J Psychiatr Res 1975 12 189 198 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 1202204
12. The stroke impact scale 3.0: evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity of the Brazilian version. Carod-Artal FJ, Coral LF, Trizotto DS, Moreira CM, Stroke 2008 39 2477 2484 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.513671 18635846
13. Chronic stroke motor recovery: duration of active neuromuscular stimulation. Cauraugh JH, Kim SB, J Neurol Sci 2003 215 13 19 10.1016/S0022-510X(03)00169-2 14568122
14. Relation between stimulation characteristics and clinical outcome in studies using electrical stimulation to improve motor control of the upper extremity in stroke. de Kroon JR, IJzerman MJ, Chae J, Lankhorst GJ, Zilvold G, J Rehabil Med 2005 37 65 74 10.1080/16501970410024190 15788340
15. Bilateral movement training and stroke motor recovery progress: a structured review and meta-analysis. Cauraugh JH, Lodha N, Naik SK, Summers JJ, Hum Mov Sci 2010 29 853 870 10.1016/j.humov.2009.09.004 19926154
16. Stroke motor recovery: active neuromuscular stimulation and repetitive practice schedules. Cauraugh JH, Kim SB, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003 74 1562 1566 10.1136/jnnp.74.11.1562 14617717
17. Training-induced changes in the pattern of triceps to biceps activation during reaching tasks after chronic and severe stroke. Barker RN, Brauer S, Carson R, Exp Brain Res 2009 196 483 496 10.1007/s00221-009-1872-8 19504088
18. Progress toward motor recovery with active neuromuscular stimulation: muscle activation pattern evidence after a stroke. Cauraugh JH, Kim S, J Neurol Sci 2003 207 25 29 10.1016/S0022-510X(02)00355-6 12614927
19. Winer BJ, Brown DR, Michels KM, Statistical principles in experimental design (third ed) New York: McGraw-Hill 1991
20. Force control and degree of motor impairments in chronic stroke. Lodha N, Naik SK, Coombes SA, Cauraugh JH, Clin Neurophysiol 2010 121 1952 1961 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.04.005 20435515
21. Recovery of thumb and finger extension and its relation to grasp performance after stroke. Lang CE, DeJong SL, Beebe JA, J Neurophysiol 2009 102 451 459 10.1152/jn.91310.2008 19458140
22. Latash ML, Synergy New York: Oxford University Press 2008
23. Observational assessment of forceful exertion and the perceived force demands of daily activities. Marshall MM, Armstrong TJ, J Occup Rehabil 2004 14 281 294 15638258
24. Uncontrolled manifold analysis of single trials during multi-finger force production by persons with and without Down syndrome. Scholz JP, Kang N, Patterson D, Latash ML, Exp Brain Res 2003 153 45 58 10.1007/s00221-003-1580-8 12928761
25. The impact of confounder-selection criteria on effect estimation. Mickey RM, Greenland S, Am J Epidemiol 1989 129 125 137 2910056
26. Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression. Bursac Z, Gauss CH, Williams DK, Hosmer DW, Source Code Biol Med 2008 3 17 10.1186/1751-0473-3- 17 19087314
27. Comparison of stopping rules in forward stepwise regression. Bendel RB, Afifi AA, J Am Stat Assoc 1977 72 46 53
28. Montgomery DC, Peck EA, Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis New York: Wiley 1982
29. Physiological and developmental implications of motor unit anatomy. Ounjian M, Roy RR, Eldred E, Garfinkel A, Payne JR, Armstrong A, Toga AW, Edgerton VR, J Neurobiol 1991 22 547 559 10.1002/neu.480220510 1890428
30. Spatial-distribution of muscle-fibers within the territory of a motor unit. Bodinefowler S, Garfinkel A, Roy RR, Edgerton VR, Muscle Nerve 1990 13 1133 1145 10.1002/mus.880131208 1702521
31. Basmajian JV, De Luca CJ, Muscles Alive: their functions revealed by electromyography Baltimore, Maryland: Williams & Wilkins 5 1985
32. Functional significance of cell size in spinal motoneurons. Henneman E, Somjen G, Carpenter DO, J Neurophysiol 1965 28 560 580 14328454
33. Excitability and inhibitability of motoneurons of different sizes. Henneman E, Somjen G, Carpenter DO, J Neurophysiol 1965 28 599 620 5835487
34. The relationship of motor unit size, firing rate and force. Conwit RA, Stashuk D, Tracy B, McHugh M, Brown WF, Metter EJ, Clinical Neurophysiol 1999 110 1270 1275 10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00054-1
35. Effect of sensory feedback from the proximal upper limb on voluntary isometric finger flexion and extension in hemiparetic stroke subjects. Hoffmann G, Schmit BD, Kahn JH, Kamper DG, J Neurophysiol 2011 106 2546 2556 10.1152/jn.00522.2010 21832028
36. Are age-related increases in force variability due to decrements in strength? Sosnoff JJ, Newell KM, Exp Brain Res 2006 174 86 94 10.1007/s00221-006-0422-x 16575579
37. Progressive shoulder abduction loading is a crucial element of arm rehabilitation in chronic stroke. Ellis MD, Sukal-Moulton T, Dewald JPA, Neurorehab Neural Repair 2009 23 862 869 10.1177/1545968309332927
38. Shoulder abduction-induced reductions in reaching work area following hemiparetic stroke: neuroscientific implications. Sukal TM, Ellis MD, Dewald JP, Exp Brain Res 2007 183 215 223 10.1007/s00221-007-1029-6 17634933
39. Absence of a proximal to distal gradient of motor deficits in the upper extremity early after stroke. Beebe JA, Lang CE, Clinical Neurophysiol 2008 119 2074 2085 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.04.293