Enhancing depression mechanisms in midbrain dopamine neurons achieves homeostatic resilience

Science

Volumn 344, Issue 6181, 2014, Pages 313-319

  Friedman, Allyson K ^a   Walsh, Jessica J ^a   Juarez, Barbara ^a   Ku, Stacy M ^a   Chaudhury, Dipesh ^a   Wang, Jing ^a   Li, Xianting ^a   Dietz, David M ^a   Pan, Nina ^a   Vialou, Vincent F ^a   Neve, Rachael L ^b   Yue, Zhenyu ^a   Han, Ming Hu ^a  

^a MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POTASSIUM CHANNEL; HYPERPOLARIZATION ACTIVATED CYCLIC NUCLEOTIDE GATED CHANNEL; LAMOTRIGINE; TRIAZINE DERIVATIVE;

HOMEOSTASIS; NEUROLOGY; POTASSIUM;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ANTIDEPRESSANT ACTIVITY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPRESSION; DOPAMINERGIC NERVE CELL; HOMEOSTASIS; HYPERACTIVITY; MESENCEPHALON; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OPTOGENETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIAL STRESS; VENTRAL TEGMENTUM; ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; C57BL MOUSE; COPING BEHAVIOR; DRUG EFFECTS; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; MALE; MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; MENTAL STRESS; METABOLISM; PATCH CLAMP TECHNIQUE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TRANSGENIC MOUSE;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; DEPRESSION; DOPAMINERGIC NEURONS; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; HOMEOSTASIS; HYPERPOLARIZATION-ACTIVATED CYCLIC NUCLEOTIDE-GATED CHANNELS; MALE; MEMBRANE POTENTIALS; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICE, TRANSGENIC; OPTOGENETICS; PATCH-CLAMP TECHNIQUES; POTASSIUM CHANNELS; RESILIENCE, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; TRIAZINES; VENTRAL TEGMENTAL AREA;

EID: 84899483845     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1249240     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. V. Krishnan et al., Cell 131, 391-404 (2007).
2. A. Feder, E. J. Nestler, D. S. Charney, Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 446-457 (2009).
3. S. J. Russo, J. W. Murrough, M. H. Han, D. S. Charney, E. J. Nestler, Nat. Neurosci. 15, 1475-1484 (2012).
4. S. Kumar, G. Feldman, A. Hayes, Cognit. Ther. Res. 32, 734-744 (2008).
5. T. A. Carey, Clin. Psychol. Rev. 31, 236-248 (2011).
6. S. M. Southwick, D. S. Charney, Science 338, 79-82 (2012).
7. V. Vialou et al., Nat. Neurosci. 13, 745-752 (2010).
8. E. J. Nestler, W. A. Carlezon Jr., Biol. Psychiatry 59, 1151-1159 (2006).
9. D. Chaudhury et al., Nature 493, 532-536 (2013).
10. O. Berton et al., Science 311, 864-868 (2006).
11. K. M. Tye et al., Nature 493, 537-541 (2013).
12. J.-L. Cao et al., J. Neurosci. 30, 16453-16458 (2010).
13. S. A. Golden, H. E. Covington 3rd, O. Berton, S. J. Russo, Nat. Protoc. 6, 1183-1191 (2011).
14. M. J. Wanat, F. W. Hopf, G. D. Stuber, P. E. M. Phillips, A. Bonci, J. Physiol. 586, 2157-2170 (2008).
15. H. Neuhoff, A. Neu, B. Liss, J. Roeper, J. Neurosci. 22, 1290-1302 (2002).
16. N. P. Poolos, M. Migliore, D. Johnston, Nat. Neurosci. 5, 767-774 (2002).
17. M. A. Frye, N. Engl. J. Med. 364, 51-59 (2011).
18. M. B. Wilkinson et al., J. Neurosci. 31, 9084-9092 (2011).
19. Y. Nakatani, H. Masuko, T. Amano, J. Pharmacol. Sci. 123, 203-206 (2013).
20. M. Biel, C. Wahl-Schott, S. Michalakis, X. Zong, Physiol. Rev. 89, 847-885 (2009).
21. J. Zhang, M. S. Shapiro, Neuron 76, 1133-1146 (2012).
22. H. C. Tsai et al., Science 324, 1080-1084 (2009).
23. J. J. Walsh et al., Nat. Neurosci. 17, 27-29 (2014).
24. J. W. Koo et al., Science 338, 124-128 (2012).
25. E. B. Margolis, J. M. Mitchell, J. Ishikawa, G. O. Hjelmstad, H. L. Fields, J. Neurosci. 28, 8908-8913 (2008).
26. S. Lammel et al., Neuron 57, 760-773 (2008).
27. G. Turrigiano, L. F. Abbott, E. Marder, Science 264, 974-977 (1994).
28. G. Turrigiano, Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 34, 89-103 (2011).
29. A. Maffei, K. Nataraj, S. B. Nelson, G. G. Turrigiano, Nature 443, 81-84 (2006).
30. A. Destexhe, E. Marder, Nature 431, 789-795 (2004).
31. K. Whalley, Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 14, 820-821 (2013).
32. D. K. Dickman, G. W. Davis, Science 326, 1127-1130 (2009).
33. S. Lammel et al., Nature 491, 212-217 (2012).