Sericin-carboxymethyl cellulose porous matrices as cellular wound dressing material

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 102, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1928-1940

  Nayak, Sunita ^a   Kundu, S C ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Antheraea mylitta; growth factor; hydrogel; sericin; wound dressing

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE; CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; ENZYME INHIBITION; FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; HYDROGELS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; THREE DIMENSIONAL; TISSUE ENGINEERING; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

ANTHERAEA MYLITTA; BIOPHYSICAL CHARACTERIZATION; GROWTH FACTOR; SERICIN; TISSUE ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTORS; TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR ALPHA; WOUND DRESSINGS;

BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS;

ALUMINUM CHLORIDE; BROMINE DERIVATIVE; CARBOXYMETHYLCELLULOSE; GELATIN; GELATINASE A; GELATINASE B; GLUTARALDEHYDE; HYDROXYLYSINE; HYDROXYPROLINE; LYSINE; SERICIN; TETRAZOLIUM; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR BETA1; BIOMATERIAL; DELAYED RELEASE FORMULATION; HYDROGEL;

ABSORPTION; ABSORPTION BAND; ANIMAL CELL; ANTHERAEA MYLITTA; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BOMBYX MORI; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; CELL MIGRATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL VIABILITY; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; COCOON; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; CONFOCAL LASER MICROSCOPY; CROSS LINKING; CYTOTOXICITY; ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; FREEZE DRYING; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HYDROGEL DRESSING; HYDROGEN BOND; HYDROLYSIS; INFLAMMATION; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; INNATE IMMUNITY; KERATINOCYTE; MACROPHAGE; MTT ASSAY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOPHILICITY; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PORE SIZE; POROSITY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SOLUBILITY; STATIC ELECTRICITY; TISSUE ENGINEERING; WATER TRANSPORT; WOUND DRESSING; WOUND HEALING; X RAY DIFFRACTION; ZYMOGRAPHY; ANIMAL; BANDAGE; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; DELAYED RELEASE FORMULATION; DRUG EFFECTS; HYDROGEL; MOTH;

ANIMALS; BANDAGES; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CARBOXYMETHYLCELLULOSE SODIUM; CELL ADHESION; CELL PROLIFERATION; DELAYED-ACTION PREPARATIONS; HUMANS; HYDROGEL; KERATINOCYTES; MOTHS; POROSITY; SERICINS; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR BETA1; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 84899441672     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34865     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Koschwanez HE, Broadbent E,. The use of wound healing assessment methods in psychological studies: A review and recommendations. Brit J Health Psych 2011; 16: 3-32.
2. Clark RA, Ghosh K, Tonnesen MG,. Tissue engineering for cutaneous wounds. J Invest Dermatol 2007; 127: 1018-1029.
3. 2+. J Invest Dermatol 1999; 112: 957-964.
4. Armstrong DG, Jude EB,. The role of matrix metalloproteinases in wound healing. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2002; 92: 12-18.
5. Salo T, Makela M, Kylmaniemi M, Autio-Harmainen H, Larjava H,. Expression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and 9 during early human wound healing. Lab Invest 1994; 70: 176-182.
6. Ben-Bassat H,., Chaouat M, Segal N, Zumai E, Wexler MR,., Eldad A,. How long can cryopreserved skin be stored to maintain adequate graft performance? Burns 2001; 27: 425-431.
7. Zaman HU, Islam JM, Khan MA, Khan RA,. Physico-mechanical properties of wound dressing material and its biomedical application. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2011; 4: 1369-1375.
8. Boateng JS, Matthews KH, Stevens HN, Eccleston GM,. Wound healing dressings and drug delivery systems: A review. J Pharm Sci 2008; 97: 2892-2923.
9. Leon-Villapalos J, Eldardiri M, Dziewulski P,. The use of human deceased donor skin allograft in burn care. Cell Tissue Bank 2010; 11: 99-104.
10. Nolte SV, Xu W, Rennekampff HO, Rodemann HP,. Diversity of fibroblasts-A review on implications for skin tissue engineering. Cell Tissues Organs 2008; 187: 165-176.
11. Hunt NC, Grover LM,. Cell encapsulation using biopolymer gels for regenerative medicine. Biotechnol Lett 2010; 32: 733-742.
12. Zhong SP, Zhang YZ, Lim CT,. Tissue scaffolds for skin wound healing and dermal reconstruction. WIREs Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 2010; 2: 510-525.
13. Ikada Y,. Challenges in tissue engineering. J R Soc Interface 2006; 3: 589-601.
14. Gamo T, Inokuchi T, Laufer H,. Polypeptides of fibroin and sericin secreted from the different sections of the silk gland in Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem 1977; 7: 285-295.
15. Kundu SC, Dash BC, Dash R,. Natural protective glue protein, sericin bioengineered by silkworms: Potential for biomedical and biotechnological applications. Prog Polym Sci 2008; 33: 998-1012.
16. Aramwit P, Siritientong T, Srichana T,. Potential applications of silk sericin, a natural protein from textile industry by-products. Waste Manag Res 2012; 30: 217-224.
17. Zhang YQ,. Applications of natural silk protein sericin in biomaterials. Biotechnol Adv 2002; 20: 91-100.
18. Dash BC, Mandal BB, Kundu SC,. Silk gland sericin protein membranes: Fabrication and characterization for potential biotechnological applications. J Biotechnol 2009; 144: 321-329.
19. Zhaorigetu S, Sasaki M, Kato N,. Consumption of sericin suppresses colon oxidative stress and aberrant crypt foci in 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-treated rats by colon undigested sericin. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo) 2007; 53: 297-300.
20. Nagai N, Murao T, Ito Y, Okamoto N, Sasaki M,. Enhancing effects of sericin on corneal wound healing in rat debrided corneal epithelium. Biol Pharm Bull 2009; 32: 933-936.
21. Aramwit P, Kanokpanont S, De-Eknamkul W, Srichana T,. Monitoring of inflammatory mediators induced by silk sericin. J Biosci Bioeng 2009; 107: 556-561.
22. Morikawa M, Kimura T, Murakami M, Katayama K, Terada S, Yamaguchi A,. Rat islet culture in serum-free medium containing silk protein sericin. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2009; 16: 223-228.
23. Nayak S, Talukdar S, Kundu SC,. Potential of 2D crosslinked sericin membranes with improved biostability for skin tissue engineering. Cell Tissue Res 2012; 347: 783-794.
24. Lim KS, Kundu J, Reeves A, Poole-Warren LA, Kundu SC,., Martens PJ,. The influence of silkworm species on cellular interactions with novel PVA/silk sericin hydrogels. Macromol Biosci 2012; 12: 322-332.
25. Kundu B, Kundu SC,. Silk sericin/polyacrylamide in situ forming hydrogels for dermal reconstruction. Biomaterials 2012; 30: 7456-7467.
26. Leonardis M, Palange A, Dornelles RF, Hund F,. Use of cross-linked carboxymethyl cellulose for soft-tissue augmentation: Preliminary clinical studies. Clin Interv Aging 2010; 5: 317-322.
27. Moseley R, Walker M, Waddington RJ, Chen WY,. Comparison of the antioxidant properties of wound dressing materials-carboxymethylcellulose, hyaluronan benzyl ester and hyaluronan, towards polymorphonuclear leukocyte-derived reactive oxygen species. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 1549-1557.
28. Boppana R, Kulkarni RV, Mutalik SS, Setty CM, Sa B,. Interpenetrating network hydrogel beads of carboxymethylcellulose and egg albumin for controlled release of lipid lowering drug. J Microencapsul 2010; 27: 337-344.
29. Reeves R, Ribeiro A, Lombardo L, Boyer R, Leach JB,. Synthesis and characterization of carboxymethylcellulose-methacrylate hydrogel cell scaffolds. Polymers 2010; 2: 252-264.
30. Heinze T, Koschella A,. Carboxymethyl ethers of cellulose and starch-A review. Macromol Symp 2005; 223: 13-39.
31. Kleiner DE, Stetler-Stevenson WG,. Quantitative zymography: Detection of pictogram quantities of gelatinases. Anal Biochem 1994; 218: 325-329.
32. Annabi N, Nichol JW, Zhong X, Ji C, Koshy S, Khademhosseini A, Dehghani F,. Controlling the porosity and microarchitecture of hydrogels for tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2010; 4: 371-383.
33. Bigi A, Cojazzi G, Panzavolta S, Rubini K, Roveri N,. Mechanical and thermal properties of gelatin films at different degrees of glutaraldehyde crosslinking. Biomaterials 2001; 8: 763-768.
34. Cheung DT, Nimni ME,. Mechanism of crosslinking of proteins by glutaraldehyde II. Reaction with monomeric and polymeric collagen. Connect Tissue Res 1982; 2: 201-216.
35. Silva CJSM, Sousa F, Gubitz G, Cavaco-Paulo A,. Chemical modifications on proteins using glutaraldehyde. Food Technol Biotechnol 2004; 1: 51-56.
36. Teramoto H, Miyazawa M,. Molecular orientation behaviour of silk sericin film as revealed by ATR infrared spectroscopy. Biomacromolecules 2005; 6: 2049-2057.
37. Mandal BB, Priya AS, Kundu SC,. Novel silk sericin/gelatin 3-D scaffolds and 2-D films: Fabrication and characterization for potential tissue engineering applications. Acta Biomater 2009; 5: 3007-3020.
38. Lawrence BJ, Madihally SV,. Cell colonization in degradable 3D porous matrices. Cell Adh Migr 2008; 2: 9-16.
39. Hollister SJ,. Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering. Nat Mater 2005; 4: 518-524.
40. Li J, Pan J, Zhang L, Yu Y,. Culture of hepatocytes on fructose-modified chitosan scaffolds. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 2317-2322.
41. Chang HI, Wang Y,. Cell responses to surface and architecture of tissue engineering scaffolds. In:, Eberli D, editor. Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Engineering-Cells and Biomaterials. New York, USA: InTech; 2011. p 569-588. DOI: 10.5772/21983. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/regenerative- medicine-and-tissue-engineering-cells-and-biomaterials/cell-responses-to- surface-and-architecture-of-tissue-engineering-scaffolds.
42. Murphy CM, O'Brien FJ,. Understanding the effect of mean pore size on cell activity in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds. Cell Adh Migr 2010; 4: 377-381.
43. Yannas IV,. Tissue regeneration by use of collagen-glycosaminoglycan copolymers. Clin Mater 1992; 9: 179-187.
44. Griffith LG,. Emerging design principles in biomaterials and scaffold for tissue engineering Ann N Y Acad 2002; 961: 83-95.
45. Ranucci CS, Kumar A, Batra SP, Moghe PV,. Control of hepatocyte function on collagen foames: Sizing matrix pores toward selective induction of 2-D and 3-D cellular morphogenesis. Biomaterials 2000; 21: 783-793.
46. Kondo T,. The assignment of IR absorption bands due to free hydroxyl groups in cellulose. Cellulose 1997; 4: 281-292.
47. Magoshi J, Magoshi Y, Nakamura S,. Physical properties and structure of silk: 10. The mechanism of fibre formation from liquid silk of silkworm Bombyx mori. Polym Commun 1985; 26: 309-311.
48. Xu Q, Buckley D, Guan C, Guo HC,. Structural insights into the mechanism of intramolecular proteolysis. Cell 1999; 5: 651-661.
49. Hatefi Y,. The mitochondrial electron transport and oxidative phosphorylation system. Annu Rev Biochem 1985; 54: 1015-1069.
50. Webb K, Hlady V, Tresco PA,. Relative importance of surface wettability and charged functional groups on NIH 3T3 fibroblast attachment, spreading and cytoskeletal organization. J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 41: 422-430.
51. Planell JA, Navarro M, Altankov G, Aparicio C, Engel E, Gil J, Ginebra MP, Lacroix D,. Materials surface effects on biological interactions. In:, Shastri VP, Altankov G, Lendlein A, editor. Advances in Regenerative Medicine: Role of Nanotechnology and Engineering Principles. Netherlands: Springer; 2010. p 233-252.
52. Huttenlocher A, Sandborg RR, Horwitz AF,. Adhesion in cell migration. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1995; 7: 697-706.
53. Parks WC,. The production, role and regulation of matrix metalloproteinases in the healing epidermis. Wounds 1995; 7: 23-37.
54. Steffensen B, Hakkinen L, Larjava H,. Proteolytic events of wound-healing-coordinated interactions among matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), integrins, and extracellular matrix molecules. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2001; 5: 373-398.
55. Guo S, Dipietro LA,. Factors affecting wound healing. J Dent Res 2010; 89: 219-229.
56. Sapolsky AI, Howell DS,. Further characterization of a neutral metalloprotease isolated from human articular cartilage. Arthritis Rheum 1982; 25: 981-988.
57. Pasparakis M,. Regulation of tissue homeostasis by NF-kappaB signalling: Implications for inflammatory diseases. Nat Rev Immunol 2009; 9: 778-788.
58. Kidd BL, Urban LA,. Mechanisms of inflammatory pain. Br J Anaesth 2001; 87: 3-11.