Modeling human behavior in the aftermath of a hypothetical improvised nuclear detonation

12th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems 2013, AAMAS 2013

Volumn 2, Issue , 2013, Pages 949-956

  Parikh, Nidhi ^a   Swarup, Samarth ^a   Stretz, Paula E ^a   Rivers, Caitlin M ^a   Lewis, Bryan L ^a   Marathe, Madhav V ^a   Eubank, Stephen G ^a   Barrett, Christopher L ^a   Lum, Kristian ^a   Chungbaek, Youngyun ^a  

^a VIRGINIA BIOINFORMATICS INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavior Modeling; Disaster Modeling; Social Simulation

Indexed keywords

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; RADIATION EFFECTS; SOCIAL SCIENCES;

BEHAVIOR MODEL; BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; HUMAN POPULATION; INTERDEPENDENT INFRASTRUCTURES; MULTI AGENT SIMULATION; MULTI-AGENT INTERACTION; PHYSICAL EFFECTS; SOCIAL SIMULATIONS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84899433200     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. SALT mass casualty triage. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 2(4):245-246, Dec 2008.
2. E. Auf der Heide. The importance of evidence-based disaster planning. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 47(1):34-49, Jan 2006.
3. C. Barrett, S. Eubank, A. Marathe, M. Marathe, Z. Pan, and S. Swarup. Information integration to support policy informatics. The Innovation Journal, 16(1):article 2, 2011.
4. R. J. Beckman, K. A. Baggerly, and M. D. McKay. Creating synthetic baseline populations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 30(6):415-429, November 1996.
5. B. R. Buddemeier, J. E. Valentine, K. K. Millage, and L. D. Brandt. National Capital Region: Key response planning factors for the aftermath of nuclear terrorism. Technical Report LLNL-TR-512111, Lawrence Livermore National Lab, November 2011.
6. M. J. Dombroski and P. S. Fischbeck. An integrated physical dispersion and behavioral response model for risk assessment of radiological dispersion device (RDD) events. Risk Analysis, 26(2):501-514, 2006.
7. T. E. Drabek and K. S. Boggs. Families in disaster: reactions and relatives. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 30:443-451, 1968.
8. C. V. Goldman and S. Zilberstein. Communication-based decomposition mechanisms for decentralized MDPs. J. Artif. Int. Res., 32(1):169-202, May 2008.
9. T. M. Guterbock, J. H. Lambert, R. A. Bebel, and M. W. Parker. NCR behavioral survey 2011: Work, school or home? Issues in sheltering In place during an emergency. Technical report, Center for Survey Research, University of Virginia, Aug. 2011.
10. R. D. Lasker. Redefining Readiness: Terrorism Planning Through the Eyes of the Public. Center for the Advancement of Collaborative Strategies in Health, New York Academy of Medicine, 2004.
11. R. D. Lasker, N. D. Hunter, and S. E. Francis. With the Public's Knowledge, We Can Make Sheltering in Place Possible. New York Academy of Medicine, New York, NY, 2007.
12. Y. Lin, I. Fedchenia, B. LaBarre, and R. Tomastik. Agent-based simulation of evacuation: An office building case study. In W. W. F. Klingsch, C. Rogsch, A. Schadschneider, and M. Schreckenberg, editors, Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2008, pages 347-357. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010. 10.1007/978-3-642-04504-2-30.
13. S. Liu, P. Murray-Tuite, and L. Schweitzer. Analysis of child pick-up during daily routines and for daytime no-notice evacuations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(1):48-67, Jan. 2012.
14. X. Pan. Computational Modeling of Human and Social Behaviors for Emergency Egress Analysis. PhD thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, 2006.
15. N. Parikh, S. Shirole, and S. Swarup. Modeling the effects of transient populations on epidemics. In The AAAI Fall Symposium on Social Networks and Social Contagion, Arlington, VA, Nov 2012.
16. N. Pelechano, K. O'brien, B. Silverman, and N. Badler. Crowd Simulation Incorporating Agent Psychological Models, Roles and Communication. In 1st Int'l Workshop on Crowd Simulation, pages 21-30, 2005.
17. R. W. Perry and M. K. Lindell. Understanding citizen response to disasters with implications for terrorism. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 11(2):49-60, 2003.
18. M. F. Sherman, M. Peyrot, L. A. Magda, and R. R. M. Gershon. Modeling pre-evacuation delay by evacuees in World Trade Center towers 1 and 2 on September 11, 2001: A revisit using regression analysis. Fire Safety Journal, July 2011.
19. B. R. Steunebrink, M. Dastani, and J.-J. C. Meyer. Emotions to control agent deliberation. In Proc. AAMAS, pages 973-980, Richland, SC, 2010.
20. R. Sutton, D. Precup, and S. Singh. Between MDPs and semi-MDPs: A framework for temporal abstraction in reinforcement learning. Artificial Intelligence, 112(1-2):181-211, 1999.
21. J. Tsai, N. Fridman, E. Bowring, M. Brown, S. Epstein, G. Kaminka, S. C. Marsella, A. Ogden, I. Rika, A. Sheel, M. Taylor, X. Wang, A. Zilka, and M. Tambe. ESCAPES - Evacuation simulation with children, authorities, parents, emotions, and social comparison. In Proc. AAMAS, Taipei, Taiwan, May 2011.
22. L. M. Wein, Y. Choi, and S. Denuit. Analyzing evacuation versus shelter-in-place strategies after a terrorist nuclear detonation. Risk Analysis, 30(6):1315-1327, 2010.