List-level transfer effects in temporal learning: Further complications for the list-level proportion congruent effect

Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 373-385

  Schmidt, James R ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Conflict adaptation; Contingency learning; Contrast; Delta plot; Distributional analyses; Proportion congruent; Temporal learning; Transfer

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; LEARNING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS; STROOP TEST; TEMPORAL CORTEX; UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT; ADAPTATION; ATTENTION; CONFLICT; NORMAL HUMAN; TASK PERFORMANCE; ADULT; COGNITIVE BIAS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FEMALE; LIST LEVEL PROPORTION CONGRUENT EFFECT; MALE; TEMPORAL LEARNING;

EID: 84899432475     PISSN: 20445911     EISSN: 2044592X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2014.896367     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Blais, C., & Bunge, S. (2010). Behavioral and neural evidence for item-specific performance monitoring. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 2758-2767. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.518
2. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624 (Pubitemid 33604139)
3. Bugg, J. M., Jacoby, L. L., & Toth, J. P. (2008). Multiple levels of control in the Stroop task. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1484-1494. doi:10.3758/MC.36.8.1484
4. Bugg, J. M., McDaniel, M. A., Scullin, M. K., & Braver, T. S. (2011). Revealing list-level control in the Stroop task by uncovering its benefits and a cost. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1595-1606. doi:10.1037/a0024670
5. Cheesman, J., & Merikle, P. M. (1986). Distinguishing conscious from unconscious perceptual processes. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 40, 343-367. doi:10.1037/h0080103
6. Crump, M. J. C., Gong, Z., & Milliken, B. (2006). The context-specific proportion congruent Stroop effect: Location as a contextual cue. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 316-321. doi:10.3758/BF03193850 (Pubitemid 44412016)
7. Crump, M. J. C., & Milliken, B. (2009). The flexibility of context-specific control: Evidence for context-driven generalization of item-specific control settings. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1523-1532. doi:10.1080/17470210902752096
8. De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dualprocess model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731-750. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.731
9. Hutchison, K. A. (2011). The interactive effects of listwide control, item-based control, and working memory capacity on Stroop performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 851-860. doi:10.1037/a0023437
10. Jacoby, L. L., Lindsay, D. S., & Hessels, S. (2003). Itemspecific control of automatic processes: Stroop process dissociations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 634-644. doi:10.3758/BF03196526
11. Kinoshita, S., Forster, K. I., & Mozer, M. C. (2008). Unconscious cognition isn?t that smart: Modulation of masked repetition priming effect in the word naming task. Cognition, 107, 623-649. doi:10.1016/j. cognition.2007.11.011
12. Kinoshita, S., Mozer, M. C., & Forster, K. I. (2011). Dynamic adaptation to history of trial difficulty explains the effect of congruency proportion on masked priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 622-636. doi:10.1037/a0024230
13. Lowe, D. G., & Mitterer, J. O. (1982). Selective and divided attention in a Stroop task. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 684-700. doi:10.1037/h0080661
14. Mordkoff, J. T. (1996). Selective attention and internal constraints: There is more to the flanker effect than biased contingencies. In A. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 483-502). Washington, DC: APA.
15. Mozer, M., Colagrosso, M., & Huber, D. (2002). A rational analysis of cognitive control in a speeded discrimination task. In T. Dietterich, S. Becker, and Z. Ghahramani (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 14 (pp. 51-57). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Pratte, M. S., Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., & Feng, C. (2010). Exploring the differences in distributional properties between Stroop and Simon effects using delta plots. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 2013-2025. doi:10.3758/APP.72.7.2013
17. Risko, E. F., Blais, C., Stolz, J. A., & Besner, D. (2008). Covert orienting: A compound-cue account of the proportion cued effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(1), 123-127. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.1.123
18. Schmidt, J. R. (2013a). Questioning conflict adaptation: Proportion congruent and Gratton effects reconsidered. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 615-630. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0373-0
19. Schmidt, J. R. (2013b). Temporal learning and list-level proportion congruency: Conflict adaptation or learning when to respond? PLoS ONE, 8, e0082320. doi:10.1371/annotation/7a79c40c-c1c2-41eb-a894-614 c12e8c056
20. Schmidt, J. R. (2013c). The parallel episodic processing (PEP) model: Dissociating contingency and conflict adaptation in the item-specific proportion congruent paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 142(1), 119-126. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy. 2012.11.004
21. Schmidt, J. R., & Besner, D. (2008). The Stroop effect: Why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 514-523. doi:10.1037/0278- 7393.34.3.514
22. Schmidt, J. R., Crump, M. J. C., Cheesman, J., & Besner, D. (2007). Contingency learning without awareness: Evidence for implicit control. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 421-435. doi:10.1016/j.con cog.2006.06.010 (Pubitemid 46874206)
23. Schmidt, J. R., & De Houwer, J. (2012a). Adding the goal to learn strengthens learning in an unintentional learning task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 723-728. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0255-5
24. Schmidt, J. R., & De Houwer, J. (2012b). Contingency learning with evaluative stimuli: Testing the generality of contingency learning in a performance paradigm. Experimental Psychology, 59, 175-182. doi:10.1 027/1618-3169/a000141
25. Schmidt, J. R., & De Houwer, J. (2012c). Does temporal contiguity moderate contingency learning in a speeded performance task? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 408-425. doi:10.1080/ 17470218.2011.632486
26. Schmidt, J. R., & De Houwer, J. (2012d). Learning, awareness, and instruction: Subjective contingency awareness does matter in the colour-word contingency learning paradigm. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 1754-1768. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2012.10.006
27. Schmidt, J. R., De Houwer, J., & Besner, D. (2010). Contingency learning in the blink of an eye: A resource dependent process. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 235-250. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.12.016
28. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies on interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662. doi:10.1037/h0054651
29. Van Maanen, L., Brown, S. D., Eichele, T.,Wagenmakers, E. J., Ho, T., Serences, J., & Forstmann, B. U. (2011). Neural correlates of trial-to-trial fluctuations in response caution. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 17488-17495. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2924-11.2011