The structural and functional connectivity of the grassland plant Lychnis flos-cuculi

Heredity

Volumn 112, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 471-478

  Aavik, T ^a   Holderegger, R ^b,c   Bolliger, J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c SWISS FEDERAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE WSL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL LAND; CONNECTIVITY; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FUNCTIONAL ROLE; GENE FLOW; GENETIC VARIATION; GRASSLAND; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; HERB; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; POPULATION GENETICS; POPULATION SIZE; WETLAND; DICOTYLEDON; INBREEDING; LANDSCAPE CHANGE;

LYCHNIS; LYCHNIS FLOS-CUCULI;

AGRICULTURE; ALGORITHM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GENE FLOW; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GEOGRAPHY; GRASSLAND; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HETEROZYGOTE; INBREEDING; LYCHNIS; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION GENETICS; PROCEDURES; SWITZERLAND;

AGRICULTURE; ALGORITHMS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; GENE FLOW; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; GEOGRAPHY; GRASSLAND; HETEROZYGOTE; INBREEDING; LYCHNIS; MODELS, GENETIC; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SWITZERLAND;

EID: 84899431846     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2013.120     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Aavik T, Augenstein I, Bailey D, Herzog F, Zobel M, Liira J (2008). What is the role of local landscape structure in the vegetation composition of field boundaries? Appl Veg Sci 11: 375-386.
2. Aavik T, Edwards P, Holderegger R, Graf R, Billeter R (2012). Genetic consequences of using seed mixtures in restoration: a case study of a wetland plant Lychnis flos-cuculi. Biol Conserv 145: 195-204.
3. Aavik T, Holderegger R, Edwards P, Billeter R (2013). Patterns of contemporary gene flow suggest low functional connectivity of grasslands in a fragmented agricultural landscape. J Appl Ecol 50: 395-403.
4. Aguilar R, Quesada M, Ashworth L, Herrerias-Diego Y, Lobo J (2008). Genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation in plant populations: susceptible signals in plant traits and methodological approaches. Mol Ecol 17: 5177-5188.
5. Angelone S, Kienast F, Holderegger R (2011). Where movement happens: scale-dependent landscape effects on genetic differentiation in the European tree frog. Ecography 34: 714-722.
6. Biere A (1991). Parental effects in Lychnis flos-cuculi. I: Seed size, germination and seedling performance in a controlled environment. J Evol Biol 4: 447-465.
7. Bruckmann SV, Krauss J, Steffan-Dewenter I (2010). Butterfly and plant specialists suffer from reduced connectivity in fragmented landscapes. J Appl Ecol 47: 799-809.
8. Dauber J, Biesmeijer JC, Gabriel D, Kunin WE, Lamborn E, Meyer B et al. (2010). Effects of patch size and density on flower visitation and seed set of wild plants: a pan- European approach. J Ecol 98: 188-196.
9. Dormann FD, Elith J, Bacher S, Buchmann C, Carl G, Carré G et al. (2013). Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36: 27-46.
10. Dyer RJ, Chan DM, Gardiakos VA, Meadows CA (2012). Pollination graphs: quantifying pollen pool covariance networks and the influence of intervening landscape on genetic connectivity in the North-American understorey tree Cornus florida L. Landsc Ecol 27: 239-251.
11. Ellstrand NC, Elam DR (1993). Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 24: 217-242.
12. Etherington TR (2011). Python based GIS tools for landscape genetics: visualising genetic relatedness and measuring landscape connectivity. Methods Ecol Evol 2: 52-55.
13. Faast R, Facelli JM, Austin AD (2011). Seed viability in declining populations of Caladenia rigida (Orchidaceae): are small populations doomed? Plant Biol 13: 86-95.
14. Galeuchet DJ, Husi R, Perret C, Fischer M, Gautschi B (2002). Characterization of microsatellite loci in Lychnis flos-cuculi (Caryophyllaceae). Mol Ecol Notes 2: 491-492. (Pubitemid 35436725)
15. Goslee SC, Urban DL (2007) the ecodist package for dissimilarity-based analysis of ecological data. J Stat Softw 22: 1-19.
16. Goudet J (1995). FSTAT (version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J Hered 86: 485-486.
17. Helm A, Oja T, Saar L, Takkis K, Talve T, Partel M. (2009). Human influence lowers plant genetic diversity in communities with extinction debt. J Ecol 97: 1329-1336.
18. Holderegger R, Buehler D, Gugerli F, Manel S (2010). Landscape genetics of plants. Trends Plant Sci 15: 675-683.
19. Honnay O, Coart E, Butaye J, Adriaens D, Van Glabeke S, Roldan-Ruiz I (2006). Low impact of present and historical landscape configuration on the genetics of fragmented Anthyllis vulneraria populations. Biol Conserv 127: 411-419. (Pubitemid 41745546)
20. Jacquemyn H, Vandepitte K, Brys R, Honnay O, Roldan-Ruiz I (2007). Fitness variation and genetic diversity in small, remnant populations of the food deceptive orchid Orchis purpurea. Biol Conserv 139: 203-210. (Pubitemid 47320618)
21. Jalas J, Suominen J (1986). Atlas Florae Europaeae. Distribution of Vascular Plants in Europe 7. Caryophyllaceae (Silenioideae) the Committee for Mapping the Flora of Europe & Societas Biologica Fennica Vanamo: Helsinki.
22. Kamm U, Gugerli F, Rotach P, Edwards P, Holderegger R (2010). Open areas in a landscape enhance pollen-mediated gene flow of a tree species: evidence from northern Switzerland. Landsc Ecol 25: 903-911.
23. Keller D, Brodbeck S, Floss I, Vonwil G, Holderegger R (2010). Ecological and genetic measurements of dispersal in a threatened dragonfly. Biol Conserv 143: 2658-2663.
24. Keller D., Van Strien M.J., Holderegger R. (2012). Do landscape barriers affect functional connectivity of populations of an endangered damselfly? Freshw Biol 57: 1373-1384.
25. Klank C, Ghazoul J, Pluess AR (2012). Genetic variation and plant performance in fragmented populations of globeflowers (Trollius europaeus) within agricultural landscapes. Conserv Genet 13: 873-884.
26. Kuussaari M, Bommarco R, Heikkinen RK, Helm A, Krauss J, Lindborg R et al. (2009). Extinction debt: a challenge for biodiversity conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 24: 564-571.
27. Landergott U, Holderegger R, Kozlowski G, Schneller JJ (2001). Historical bottlenecks decrease genetic diversity in natural populations of Dryopteris cristata. Heredity 87: 344-355. (Pubitemid 33136805)
28. Leimu R, Mutikainen P, Koricheva J, Fischer M (2006). How general are positive relationships between plant population size, fitness and genetic variation? J Ecol 94: 942-952. (Pubitemid 44167953)
29. Liira J, Schmidt T, Aavik T, Arens P, Augenstein I, Bailey D et al. (2008). Plant functional group composition and large-scale species richness in the agricultural landscapes of Europe. J Veg Sci 19: 3-14. (Pubitemid 351448457)
30. Moccia MD, Oger-Desfeux C, Marais GAB, Widmer A (2009). A White Campion (Silene latifolia) floral expressed sequence tag (EST) library: annotation, EST-SSR characterization, transferability, and utility for comparative mapping. BMC Genomics 10: 243.
31. Neel MC (2008). Patch connectivity and genetic diversity conservation in the federally endangered and narrowly endemnoc plant species Astragalms albens (Fabaceae). Biol Conserv 141: 938-955.
32. Pascual-Hortal L, Saura S (2006). Comparison and development of new graph-based landscape connectivity indices: towards the priorization of habitat patches and corridors for conservation. Landsc Ecol 21: 959-967. (Pubitemid 44505330)
33. Pellissier V, Muratet A, Verfaillie F, Machon N (2012). Pollination success of Lotus corniculatus (L.) in an urban context. Acta Oecol 39: 94-100.
34. R Development Core Team (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. http://www.Rproject. org/
35. Richards CM, Church S, McCauley DE (1999) the influence of population size and isolation on gene flow by pollen in Silene alba. Evolution 53: 63-73. (Pubitemid 29300659)
36. Saura S, Pascual-Hortal L (2007). A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning: comparison with existing indices and application to a case study. Landscape Urban Plan 83: 91-103. (Pubitemid 47632902)
37. Saura S, Rubio L (2010). A common currency for the different ways in which patches and links can contribute to habitat availability and connectivity in the landscape. Ecography 33: 523-537.
38. Saura S, Torne J (2009). Conefor Sensinode 2.2: a software package for quantifying the importance of habitat patches for landscape connectivity. Environ Modell Softw 24: 135-139.
39. Schmitt T, Varga Z, Seitz A (2000). Forests as dispersal barriers for Erebia medusa (Nymphalidae, Lepidoptera). Basic Appl Ecol 1: 53-59.
40. Schultz B, Dosch F (2005). Trends der Siedlungsfla?chenentwicklung und ihre Steuerung in der Schweiz und Deutschland. DISP 160: 5-15.
41. Tewksbury JJ, Levey DJ, Haddad NM, Sargent S, Orrock JL, Weldon A et al. (2002). Corridors affect plants, animals, and their interactions in fragmented landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 12923-12926.
42. Tischendorf L, Fahring L (2000). On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity. Oikos 90: 7-19. (Pubitemid 30613277)
43. Van Geert A, Van Rossum F, Triest L (2010). Do linear landscape elements in farmland act as biological corridors for pollen dispersal? J Ecol 98: 178-187.
44. Van Rossum F, Triest L (2010). Pollen dispersal in an insect-pollinated wet meadow herb along an urban river. Landscape Urban Plan 95: 201-208.
45. Van Rossum F, Triest L (2012). Stepping-stone populations in linear landscape elements increase pollen dispersal between urban forest fragments. Plant Ecol Evol 145: 332-340.
46. Van Strien MJ, Keller D, Holderegger R (2012). A new analytical approach to landscape genetic modelling: least-cost transect analysis and linear mixed models. Mol Ecol 21: 4010-4023.
47. Whitlock MC, McCauley DE (1999). Indirect measures of gene flow and migration: FST does not equal 1/(4Nm1). Heredity 82: 117-125.
48. Wratten S, Bowie M, Hickman J, Evans A, Sedcole JR, Tylianakis J (2003). Field boundaries as barriers to movement of hover flies (Diptera: Syrphidae) in cultivated land. Oecologia 134: 605-611. (Pubitemid 36317553)
49. Wright S (1965) the interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution 19: 395-420.
50. Zurbuchen A, Bachofen C, Mu? ller A, Hein S, Dorn S (2010). Are landscape structures insurmountable barriers for foraging bees? A mark-recapture study with two solitary pollen specialist species. Apidologie 41: 497-508.