Computer-aided rhetorical analysis

Applied Natural Language Processing: Identification, Investigation and Resolution

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 275-295

  Ishizaki, Suguru ^a   Kaufer, David ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899368592     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60960-741-8.ch016     Document Type: Chapter

References (35)

1. Akers, A., Kaufer, D., Ishizaki, S., Seltman, H., & Greenhouse, J. (2009). Computer-based methods for analyzing the language of medical focus groups. Technical report. University of Pittsburgh Medical School.
2. Al-Malki, A., Kaufer, D., Ishizaki, S., & Kira Dreher. (manuscript). Old stereotypes in new media: Active/passive images of Arab women in translated news.
3. Anthony, L., & Lashkia, G. (2003). Mover: A machine learning tool to assist in the reading and writing of technical papers. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 46, 185-193. doi:10.1109/TPC.2003.816789
4. Argamon, S., Whitelaw, C., Chase, P., & Hota, S. R. (2007). Stylistic text classification using functional lexical features. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(6). doi:10.1002/asi.20553
5. Atlas.Ti. (2007). Computer program, version 5.2. Berlin, Germany.
6. Burstein, J., Marcu, D., & Knight, K. (2003). Finding the WRITE stuff: Automatic identification of discourse structure in student essays. IEEE Intelligent Systems: Special Issue on Advances in Natural Language Processing, 18(1), 32-39.
7. Collins, J. (2003). Variations in written English: Characterizing the authors' rhetorical language choices across corpora of published texts. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University.
8. Ellis, N. C., & Ferreira-Junior, F. (2009). Construction learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution, and function. Modern Language Journal, 93, 370-385. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00896.x
9. Geisler, C. (2003). Analyzing streams of language: Twelve steps to the systematic coding of text, talk, and other verbal data. New York, NY: Longman.
10. Hart, R. P. (2001). Diction 5.0 (computer software). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Hoey, M. (2005). Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. London, UK: Routledge.
12. Ishizaki, S. (2009). Toward a unified theory of verbal-visual strategies in communication design. Best Paper. IEEE International Professional Communication Conference. Hawaii, July 19-22.
13. Kaufer, D. 2000. Flaming: A white paper. Retrieved from www.eudora.com.
14. Kaufer, D. (2006). Genre variation and minority ethnic identity: Exploring the personal profile in Indian American community publications. Discourse & Society, 17(6), 761-784. doi:10.1177/0957926506068432
15. Kaufer, D., & Al-Malki, A. (2009). A first for women in the kingdom: Arab/west representations of female trendsetters in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research, 2(2), 113-133. doi:10.1386/jammr.2.1and2.113/1
16. Kaufer, D., & Al-Malki, A. M. (2009). The war on terror through Arab-American eyes: The Arab-American press as a rhetorical counterpublic. Rhetoric Review, 28(1), 47-65. doi:10.1080/07350190802540724
17. Kaufer, D., & Butler, B. (1996). Rhetoric and the arts of design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
18. Kaufer, D., & Butler, B. (2000). Designing interactive worlds with words: Principles of writing as representational composition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
19. Kaufer, D., Geisler, C., Ishizaki, S., & Vlachos, P. (2005). Computer-support for genre analysis and discovery in ambient intelligence for scientific discovery. In Cai, Y. (Ed.), Ambient intelligence for scientific discovery (pp. 129-151). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-32263-4_7
20. Kaufer, D., & Hariman, R. (2008). A corpus analysis evaluating Hariman's theory of political style. Text & Talk, 28(4), 475-500.
21. Kaufer, D., & Ishizaki, S. (2006). A corpus study of canned letters: Mining the latent rhetorical proficiencies marketed to writers in a hurry and non-writers. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 40(3), 254-266. doi:10.1109/TPC.2006.880743
22. Kaufer, D., Ishizaki, S., Butler, B., & Collins, J. (2004). The power of words: Unveiling the speaker and writer's hidden craft. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
23. Kaufer, D., Ishizaki, S., Collins, J., & Vlachos, P. (2004). Teaching language awareness in rhetorical choice using IText and visualization in classroom genre assignments. Journal for Business and Technical Communication, 18(3), 361-402. doi:10.1177/1050651904263980
24. Klein, H. Klein H. (2009). Text analysis info: Category systems. Retrieved August 18, 2009, from http://www.textanalysis.info.
25. McCarthy, P. M., Graesser, A. C., & McNamara, D. S. (2006, July). Distinguishing genre using Coh-Metrix indices of cohesion. Paper presented at the Society for Text and Discourse Conference, Minneapolis, MN.
26. Miller, G. A. (1995). WordNet: A lexical database for English. Communications of the ACM, 38(11), 39-41. doi:10.1145/219717.219748
27. Ong, W. (2004). Ramus, method, and the decay of dialogue: From the art of discourse to the art of reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1958)
28. Pennebaker, J. W., Booth, R. J., & Francis, M. E. (2007). Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC. Austin, TX: LIWC. Retrieved August 18, 2009 from www.liwc.net.
29. Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. South Bend, IN: Notre Dame Press.
30. Popping, R. (2000). Computer-assisted text analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Richards, L. (1999). Using NVivo in qualitative research. London, UK: Sage.
32. Sekhon, J. (n.d.). Bootstrap Kolmogorov-Smirnov. Retrieved on March 28, 2010, from http://sekhon.berkeley.edu/matching/ks.boot.html.
33. Stein, B., & Eissen, M. (2008). Retrieval models for genre classification. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 20(1).
34. Witmore, M., & Hope, J. (2007). Shakespeare by the numbers: On the linguistic texture of the late plays. In Mukherji, S., & Lyne, R. (Eds.), Early modern tragicomedy (pp. 133-153). Cambridge, UK: D.S. Brewer.
35. Wray, A., & Perkins, M. (2000). The functions of formulaic language: An integrated model. Language & Communication, 20, 1-28. doi:10.1016/S0271-5309(99)00015-4