Mover: A Machine Learning Tool to Assist in the Reading and Writing of Technical Papers

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 185-193

  Anthony, Laurence ^a   Lashkia, George V ^b  

^a OKAYAMA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE   (Japan)

^b CHUKYO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Abstract; Computer; Discourse analysts; Genre; Information technology; Machine learning; Mover; Research article (RA); Structure; Supervised learning

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; LEARNING SYSTEMS; STUDENTS; TECHNICAL WRITING;

ENGLISH GRAMMAR;

FORMAL LANGUAGES;

EID: 0141638678     PISSN: 03611434     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TPC.2003.816789     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. U. Connor, Contrastive Rhetoric: Cross-Cultural Aspects of Second-Language Writing. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996.
2. J. Hinds, "Inductive, deductive, quasiinductive: Expository writing in Japanese, Korean, Chinese, and Thai," in Coherence in Writing: Research and Pedagogical Perspectives, U. Connor and A. M. Johns, Eds. Alexandria, VA: TESOL, 1990.
3. J. M. Swales, Genre Analysis: English In Academic And Research Settings. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990.
4. J. M. Swales, "Aspects of Article Introductions," Univ. Aston, Language Studies Unit, Birmingham, UK, Res. Rep. No. 1, 1981.
5. L. Anthony, "Characteristic features of research article titles in computer science," IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun., vol. 44, pp. 187-194, Sept. 2001.
6. G. S. Posteguillo, "A Genre-based approach to the teaching of reading and writing abstracts in computer science," in English in Specific Settings, J. Pique, J. Vicent Andreu-Beso, and D. J. Viera, Eds. Valencia, Spain: Univ. Valencia, 1996, pp. 47-57.
7. L. Anthony, "Writing research article introductions in software engineering: How accurate is a standard model?," IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun., vol. 42, pp. 38-46, Mar. 1999.
8. J. Noguchi, unpublished Ph.d. thesis, Birmingham Univ., U.K., 2000.
9. U. Connor and A. Mauranen, "Linguistic analysis of grant proposals: European Union research grants," English for Specific Purposes, vol. 18, pp. 47-62, 1999.
10. F. Salager-Meyer, "Discoursal flaws in medical English abstracts: A genre analysis per research- and text-type," Text, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 365-384, 1990.
11. R. A. Day, How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1994.
12. M. Bloor, English Language Needs in the University of Cordoba: The Report of a Survey. Birmingham, UK: Univ. Aston Language Studies Unit (mimeo), 1984.
13. T. Nakajima and S. Tsukamoto, Chitekina Kagaku Gÿutsu Bunshou no Kakikata [Writing Intelligent Scientific and Technical Texts]. Tokyo, Japan: Korona, 1996.
14. T. M. Mitchell, Machine Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1997.
15. R. Mitkov and N. Nicolov, Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins, 1997.
16. D. D. Lewis, "Naïve (Bayes) at forty: The independence assumption in information retrieval," in Proc. Eur. Conf. Machine Learning, 1998, pp. 4-15.
17. C. J. van Rijsbergen, Information Retrieval London, U.K.: Butterworth and Co, 1979.
18. Y. Yang and J. O. Pedersen, "A comparative study on feature selection in text categorization," in Proc. 14th Int. Conf. Mach. Learn., 1997, pp. 412-420.
19. V. Lashkia and S. Aleshin, "Test feature classifiers: Performance and applications," IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., vol. 31, pp, 643-650, Aug. 2001.
20. K. Kira and L. Rendell, "A practical approach to feature selection," in Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Mach. Learn., 1992, pp. 26-256.
21. J. Quinlan, C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 1993.
22. J. A. Anderson, An Introduction to Neural Networks Reading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.
23. C. D. Manning and H. Schütze, Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.