Information networks, Internet governance and innovation in world politics

Electronic Constitution: Social, Cultural, and Political Implications

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 154-173

  Padovani, Claudia ^a   Pavan, Elena ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899346748     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-254-1.ch010     Document Type: Chapter

References (43)

1. Appadurai, A. (1990). Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. Theory, Culture and Society, (7), 295-310.
2. Bijker, W. E. (2006). Why and how technology matters. In R. E. Goodin & C. Tilly (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of contextual political analysis (pp. 681-706). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. st May 2008.
4. Braman, S. (2006). Change of state: Information, policy, and power. Cambridge: MIT Press.
5. Cammaerts, B. (2008). Civil society participation in multi-stakeholder processes: In between realism and utopia. In D. Kidd, C. Ropdriguez, & L. Stein (Eds.), Making our media: Mapping global initiatives toward a democratic public sphere. Cresskill: Hampton Press.
6. Cammaerts, B., & Padovani, C. (2006, July). Theoretical reflections on multi-stakeholderism in global policy processes: the WSIS as a learning space. Paper presented at IAMCR conference, Cairo, Egypt.
7. Castells, M. (1996). The rise of network society. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
8. Deutsch, K. W. (1963). The nerves of government. New York: Free Press.
9. Held, D. (2004). Global covenant: The social alternative to the Washington consensus. Cambridge: Polity Press.
10. Held, D. (2004). Global covenant: The social alternative to the Washington consensus. Cambridge: Polity Press.
11. Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D., & Perraton, J. (1999). Global transformations: Politics, economics, and culture. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
12. Hemmati, M. (2002). Multi-stakeholder processes for governance and sustainablility: Beyond deadlock and conflict. London: Earthscan
13. Hockings, B. (2006). Multistakeholder diplomacy: Forms, functions and frustrations. In J. Kurbaljia & E. Katrandjiev (Eds.), Multistakeholder diplomacy: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 13-32). Diplo Foundation.
14. Hoffmann, J. (2006). Internet governance: A regulative idea in flux. Retrieved from http://duplox.wz-berlin.de/people/jeanette/texte/Internet%20Governance%20english%20version.pdf. Last access March 1, 2008
15. Kamarc, E. C., & Nye, J. S. (Eds.) (2002). Governance.com: Democracy in the information age. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
16. Katz, H., & Anheier, H. (2006). Global connectedness: The structure of transnational NGO networks. In M. Glasius, M. Kaldor, & H. Anheier (Eds.), Global civil society 2005/6 (pp. 240-65). London: Sage.
17. Keck, M. E., &. Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: advocacy networks in international politics. New York: Cornell University Press.
18. Kenis, P., & Schneider, V. (1991), Policy network and policy analysis:Scrutinizing a new analytical toolbox. In B. Marin & R. Mayntz (Eds.), Policy networks: Empirical evidence and theoretical considerations (pp. 25-62). Boulder, CO: West-view Press
19. Kleinwächter, W. (2004). Beyond ICANN vs. ITU? How WSIS tries to enter the new territory of Internet governance. Gazette, 66 (3-4), 233-251
20. Kleinwächter, W. (2007). The history of Internet governance. In C. Mo{double acute}eller & A. Amoroux (Eds.), Governing the Internet (pp.41-66). OSCE Representative on Freedom of Media.
21. Knoke, D., Pappi, F. U., Broadbent, J., & Tsujinaka, Y. (1996). Comparing policy networks. UK: Cambridge University Press.
22. Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. London: Sage Publications.
23. Kratochwil, F. (1989). Rules, Norms and Decisions: on the Conditions of Practical and legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affaires. Cambridge, UK: University Press.
24. Laumann, E. O., & Knoke, D. (1987). The organizational state. Madison: University Winsconsin Press.
25. Mueller, M., Brenden, K., & Pagè, C. (2004). Reinventing media activism: Public interest activism in the making of U.S. communication-information policy 1960-2002. Retrieved from http://dcc.syr.edu/ford/rma/reinventing.pdf. Last access March 1, 2008.
26. Nye, J. S., & Owens, W. A. (1996). America's information edge. In Foreign Affairs, 75(2), 20-36.
27. Padovani, C. (2005a). WSIS and multi-stakeholdersim. In D. Stauffacher & W. Kleinwachter (Eds.), The World Summit on the Information Society: Moving fro the Past into the Future (pp. 147-155). UN ICT Task Force.
28. Padovani, C. (2005b). Civil society organizations beyond WSIS: Roles and potential of a "young" stakeholder. In O. Drossou & H. Jensen (Eds.), Visions in process II: The World Summit on the Information Society. Geneva2003-Tunis 2005 (pp. 37-45). Berlin: Henrich Boell Foundation.
29. Padovani, C., & Pavan, E. (2007). Diversity reconsidered in a global multi-stakeholder environment: insights from the online world. In W. Kleinwächer (Ed.), The power of ideas: Internet governance in a global multi-stakeholder environment (pp. 99-109). Berlin: Germany Land of Ideas.
30. Padovani, C., & Tuzzi, A. (2004). WSIS as a world of words: Building a common vision of the information society?. In Continuum. Journal of Media and Society, 18(3), 360-379.
31. Padovani, C., & Tuzzi, A. (2006). Communication governance and the role civil society. Reflections on participation and the changing scope of political action. In J. Servaes & N. Carpentier (Eds.), Towards a sustainable information society beyond WSIS (pp. 51-79). Bristol & Portland: Intellect.
32. Padovani, C., Tuzzi, A., & Nesti, G. (2007). Communication and (e)democracy: Assessing European e-democracy discourses. In B. Cammaerts & N. Carpentier (Eds.), Reclaiming the media: Communication rights and democratic media roles (pp. 9-30). Bristol & Portland, UK: Intellect.
33. Onuf, N. (1989). World of our making: Rules and rule in social theory and international relations. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
34. Raboy, M., & Landry, N. (2004). La communication au coeur de la gouvernance globale. Enjueux et perspectives de la société civile au Sommet mondial sur la sociétè de l'information.Montréal: Départment de Communication, Université de Montréal. Retrieved from http://www.lrpc.umontreal.ca/smsirapport.pdf. Last access May 31st, 2008.
35. Reinecke, W. H., & Deng, F. (2000). Critical Choices. The United Nations, networks and the future of global governance. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.
36. Rosenau, J. N. (1995). Governance and democracy in a globalizing wold. In D. Archbugi, D. Held, & M. Mohler, (Eds.), Re-imagining political community: studies in cosmopolitan democracy (pp. 28-57). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
37. Rosenau, J. N. (2002). Information technologies and the skills, networks, and structures that sustain world affairs. In J. N. Rosenau & J. P. Singh (Eds.), Information Technologies and Global Politics (pp. 275-88). Albany: State University of New York Press.
38. Singh, J. P. (2002). Introduction: information technologies and the changing scope of global power and governance. In J. N. Rosenau & J. P. Singh (Eds.), Information technologies and global politics (pp. 1-38). Albany: State University of New York Press.
39. Smith, S. (2001). Reflectivist and constructivist approaches to international relations. In J. Baylis and S. Smith (eds.), The globalization of world politics. An introduction for international relations (pp 224-51). UK: Cambridge University Press.
40. United Nation Department of Public Information, News and Media Division (2006). SG/A/1006. PI1717. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2006/sga1006.doc.htm. Last access March 1st, 2008.
41. United Nations General Assembly. Resolution 56/183. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2006/sga1006.doc.htm. Last access March 1, 2008.
42. Wendt, A. (1992) Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organizations 46: 391-425
43. WGIG (2005). WGIG final report. Retrieved from http://www.wgig.org/WGIG-Report.html. Last access March 1, 2008.