Legislating interspecies embryos

The Legal, Medical and Cultural Regulation of the Body: Transformation and Transgression

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 95-125

  Fox, Marie ^a  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899323397     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (116)

1. Academy of Medical Sciences (2007), Inter-species Embryos, (London).
2. Alleyne, R. (2009), Controversial Hybrid Embryos 'are no Use to Science' new Research Suggests, Daily Telegraph (3 February).
3. Balaban, E. et al. (1988), Application of the Quail-Chick Chimera System to the Study of Brain Development and Behavior, Science 241, 1339.
4. Ballard, R.A. (2008), Animal/Human Hybrids and Chimeras: What Are They? Why Are They Being Created? And What Attempts Have Been Made to Regulate Them?, Michigan State University Journal of Medicine and Law 12, 297-319.
5. BBC News (2007), Hybrid Embryo Ban 'Unnecessary' (4 May).
6. BBC News (2008), UK's First Hybrid Embryos Created' (4 June).
7. Bennett, D.S. (2006), Chimera and the Continuum of Humanity: Erasing the Line of Constitutional Personhood, Emory Law Journal 55, 347-388.
8. Beyleveld, D., Finnegan, T. and Pattinson, S.D. (2006), The Regulation of Hybrids and Chimera in the UK, Report produced for CHIMBRIDS (Chimera and Hybrids in Comparative European and International Research), a coordinated project run by the University of Mannheim, funded by the EC Sixth framework, (on file with author).
9. Bovenkerk, B., Brom, F.W.A. and Van Den Berg, D.J. (2002), Brave New Birds: The Use of Animal Integrity in Animal Ethics', Hastings Center Report 32:1, 16-22.
10. Brazier, M. (1988), Embryo's 'Rights': Abortion and Research, in Freeman, M. (ed.), Medicine, Ethics and Law, (Stevens and Son).
11. Bridge, S. (2007), Hybrid Embryo Research is Legal, Regulator Says', The Guardian (11 January).
12. Brown, N. and Michael, M. (2004), Risky Creatures: Institutional Species Boundary Change in Biotechnology Regulation', Health, Risk and Society 6, 207-22.
13. Brown, N. and Webster, A. (2004), Reordering Life: New Medical Technologies and Society, (Wiley-Blackwell).
14. Chapman, J. (2008), Hybrid Embryos are a Hope for my Son, says David Cameron, Daily Mail (21 May).
15. Chen, Y. et al. (2003), Embryonic Stem Cells Generated by Nuclear Transfer of Human Somatic Nuclei into Rabbit Oocytes, Cell Research 13, 251.
16. Davies, G. (2006), The Sacred and the Profane: Biotechnology, Rationality and Public Debate, Environment and Planning 38, 423-444.
17. Davis-Floyd, R. and Dumit, J. (eds) (1998), Cyborg Babies: From Techno-Sex to Techno-Tots, (Routledge).
18. Dawkins, R. (1993), Gaps in the Mind, in Singer, P. and Cavalieri, P. (eds), The Great Ape Project: Equality Beyond Humanity, (St. Martin' Press).
19. Dickenson, D. (2007), Property in the Body: Feminist Perspectives, (Cambridge University Press).
20. Department of Health, (2000), Government Response to the Recommendations Made in the Chief Medical Officer's Expert Group Report, (Department of Health).
21. Department of Health (2005), Review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990: A Public Consultation, (opened 16 August 2005).
22. Department of Health (2006), Review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act: Proposals for revised legislation (including establishment of the Regulatory Authority for Tissue and Embryos) (Cm. 6989).
23. Diprose, R. (1995), The Body Biomedical Ethics Forgets, in Komesaroff, P. (ed.), Troubled Bodies: Critical Perspectives on Postmodernism, Medical Ethics and the Body, (Duke University Press).
24. Dyson, A. and Harris, J. (1991), Experiments on Embryos, (Routledge).
25. Editorial (2007), The Chimera Question: A Sensible Decision Amid much Nonsense, The Times (12 January).
26. Expert Medical Group on Human Cloning (2000), Stem Cell Research: Medical Progress with Responsibility, (Department of Health).
27. Fletcher, R., Fox, M. and McCandless, J. (2008), Legal Embodiment: Analysing the Body of Healthcare Law, Medical Law Review 16:3, 321-345.
28. Fox, M. (2000), Pre-Persons, Commodities or Cyborgs: The Legal Construction and Representation of the Embryo, Health Care Analysis 8:2, 171-188.
29. Fox, M. (2004), Re-thinking Kinship: Law's Construction of the Animal Body, Current Legal Problems 57, 469-493.
30. Fox, M. (2006), Exposing Harm: The Erasure of Animal Bodies in Health Care Law, in McLean, S. (ed.), First Do No Harm: Law, Ethics and Healthcare (Ashgate).
31. Fox, M. and Murphy, T. (forthcoming), Embryonic Hopes, Social and Legal Studies.
32. Foxcroft, L. (1997), Surrogacy-Warnock and After, Medical Law International 2, 337.
33. Franklin, S, and McKinnon, S. (eds) (2001), Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies, (Duke University Press).
34. Franklin, S. (2001), Bioloigization Revisited: Kinship Theory in the Context of the New Biologies, in Franklin, S. and McKinnon, S. (eds), Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies, (Duke University Press).
35. Franklin, S. (2006), The Cyborg Embryo: Our Path to Transbiology, Theory, Culture and Society 23, 167-187.
36. Franklin, S. (2007), Dolly Mixtures: The Remaking of Genealogy, (Duke University Press).
37. Freeman, M. (ed.) (1988), Medicine, Ethics and the Law, (Stevens and Son).
38. Freeman, M. (ed.) (2008), Law and Bioethics, (Oxford University Press).
39. Giffney, N. and Hird, M.J. (eds) (2008), Queering the Non/Human, (Ashgate Publishing).
40. Gledhill, R. and Lister, D. (2008), Cardinal Keith O'Brien Attacks 'monstrous' Human Embryo Bill', The Times (22 March).
41. Greely, H.T. (2003), Defining Chimeras ... and Chimeric Concerns, American Journal of Bioethics 3:3, 17-18.
42. Hammond, N. (2008), Regulating Hybrid Embryo Research in the UK, Bionews (7 April).
43. Haraway, D. (2004), The Promises of Monsters: A Regenerative Politics for Inappropriate/d Others, in Haraway, D., The Haraway Reader, (Routledge).
44. Hartouni, V. (1997), Cultural Conceptions: On Reproductive Technologies and the Remaking of Life, (University of Minnesota Press).
45. Hawkes, N. (2006), Nobel Scientists urge Fertility Watchdog to back Hybrid Embryos', The Times (10 January).
46. Hawkes, N. (2007), Human-cow Embryo Planned', The Times (7 November).
47. Henderson, M. (2005), Fear over Human-Animal Embryos, The Times (16 August).
48. Henderson, M. (2006), 'British Scientists plan Work on Human-Rabbit Embryos', The Times (13 January).
49. Henderson, M. (2007a), Medicine faces Ban on Rabbit-Human Embryos', The Times (5 January).
50. Henderson, M. (2007b), Ministers have been Spooked by 'Frankenbuny' Headlines', The Times (5 January).
51. Henderson, M. (2007c), The Wild East is now Tamed', The Times (10 February).
52. Henderson, M. (2007d), Scientists Triumph in Battle over Ban on Hybrid Embryos', The Times (27 February).
53. Henderson, M. (2007e), Watchdog should Approve 'Cybrid' Embryos', The Times (3 September).
54. Henderson, M. (2007f), British Scientists given Go-ahead to Create Human-Animal Embryos', The Times (6 September).
55. Henderson, M. (2007g), White Coats Defeat the Grey Suits in a Clash between Science and Whitehall, The Times (13 October).
56. Henderson, M. (2008a), Embryo Research Bill could Block Life-saving Stem Cell Treatments', The Times (15 March).
57. Henderson, M. (2008b), Does every Child Need a Father? How the Nation is Divided', The Times (10 April).
58. Henderson, M. (2009), Brain Drain Fears as Barack Obama lifts Ban on Stem-cell Funding', The Times (9 March).
59. Henderson, M. and Hurst, G. (2008), Scientists Win Public Support on Embryo Research', The Times (10 April).
60. Hennette-Vauchez, S. (2009), Words Count: How Interest in Stem Cells has made the Embryo Available - a Look at the French Law of Bioethics', Medical Law Review 17, 52-75.
61. Herring, J. (2003), Cloning in the House of Lords, Family Law 33, 63.
62. Highfield, R. (2008), Dolly Creator Prof Ian Wilmut shuns Cloning, Daily Telegraph (10 November).
63. Holland, S. et al. (eds) (2001), The Human Embryonic Stem Cell Debate: Science, Ethics and Public Policy, (MIT Press).
64. House of Commons (2008), Research Paper 08/43: Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill, (House of Commons Library).
65. House of Commons Select Committee on Science and Technology (2004-5), Fifth Report of Session 2004-5, Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law, HC 7, (House of Commons Library).
66. House of Commons Select Committee on Science and Technology (2007), Government proposals for the regulation of hybrid and chimera embryos, Fifth Report of Session 2006-7.
67. House of Lords Select Committee (2002), Report on Stem Cell Research, HL Paper 83(i).
68. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (2007a), Hybrids and Chimeras: A consultation on the ethical and social implications of creating human/animal embryos in research, (Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority).
69. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (2007b), Hybrids and Chimeras: A report on the findings of the consultation, (Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority).
70. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (2009), Code of Practice, 8th Edition.
71. Hyde, A. (1997), Bodies of Law, (Princeton University Press).
72. Jackson, E. (2008), The Donation of Eggs for Research and the Rise of Neopaternalism, in Freeman, M. (ed.), Law and Bioethics, (Oxford University Press).
73. Karpin, I. (2006), The Uncanny Embryos: Legal Limits to the Human and Reproduction without Women, Sydney Law Review 28, 599-623.
74. Kass, L.R. (1998), The Wisdom of Repugnance, in Kass, L.R. and Wilson, J.Q. (eds), The Ethics of Human Cloning, (AEI Press).
75. Kass, L.R. and Wilson, J.Q. (1998), The Ethics of Human Cloning, (AEI Press).
76. Komesaroff, P. (ed.) (2004), Troubled Bodies: Critical Perspectives on Postmodernism, Medical Ethics and the Body, (Duke University Press).
77. Kopinski, N.E. (2003-4), Human-Nonhuman Chimera: A Regulatory Proposal on the Blurring of Species Lines, Boston College Law Review 619-666.
78. Latour, B. (1993), We Have Never Been Modern, (Harvard University Press).
79. Lee, S. (1986), Law and Morals, (Oxford University Press).
80. Letter to The Times (2007), Stemming Studies, The Times (10 January).
81. McLean, S. (ed.) (2006), First Do No Harm: Law, Ethics and Healthcare, (Ashgate).
82. Mitchell, L.M. and Georges, E. (1998), Baby's First Picture: The Cyborg Fetus of Ultrasound Imaging, in Davis-Floyd, R. and Dumit, J. (eds) (1998), Cyborg Babies: From Techno-Sex to Techno-Tots, (Routledge).
83. Moore, J. (2008), What's Monstrous about Saving Lives? The Sun (27 May).
84. Morgan, D. and Ford, M. (2004), Cell Phoney: Human Cloning after Quintavalle, Journal of Medical Ethics 30, 524-526.
85. Mulkay, M. (1997), The Embryo Research Debate: Science and the Politics of Reproduction, (Cambridge University Press).
86. Munzer, S.R. (2007-08), Human-Nonhuman Chimeras in Embryonic Stem Cell Research, Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 21:1, 123-178.
87. Nicholl, H. (2006), British Stem Cell Scientists seek Licence to Create Chimeras, Bionews (9 October).
88. Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2000), Stem Cell Research Therapy: The Ethical Issues, (Nuffield Council).
89. Oakeshott, I. and Templeton S. (2008), An Embryonic Disaster, The Sunday Times (16 March).
90. Phillips, M. (2008), If this Monstrous Bill is not a Matter for MPs, then What is?', Daily Mail (23 March).
91. Prince, R. (2008a), MPs vote against Human-animal Hybrid Embryo Ban, Daily Telegraph (19 May).
92. Prince, R. (2008b), MPs vote to allow Human-animal Hybrids, Daily Telegraph (23 October).
93. Quintavalle, J. and Lovell-Badge, R. (2008), For and against Human-animal Embryos for Research, Daily Telegraph (8 April).
94. Rayfield, L. (2008), We must Pause at this Amber Light, The Times (31 March).
95. Rollin, B.E. (2003), Ethics and Species Integrity, American Journal of Bioethics 3:3, 15-17.
96. Sample, I. (2009), Rival Stem Cell Technique takes the Heat out of Hybrid Embryo Debate, The Guardian (13 January).
97. Scott, J.R. and Baylis, F. (2003), Crossing Species Boundaries, American Journal of Bioethics 3:3, 1-9.
98. Scott, R. (2007), Choosing Between Possible Lives: Law and Ethics of Prenatal and Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, (Hart Publishing).
99. Shaikh, N. (2009), Lack of Funding Threatens Progress in Admixed Embryo Research, Bionews (19 January).
100. Sinclair, K. (2008), UK MPs Vote to allow 'Admixed' Embryo Research, Bionews (27 May).
101. Staff Reporter (2007), Ban on Hybrid Embryos is Harmful, Daily Mail (5 April).
102. Staff Reporter (2008a), Embryos could Save Millions, The Sun (18 May).
103. Staff Reporter (2008b), Science behind Stem Cell Debate, The Sun (18 May).
104. Squier, S. (2004), Liminal Lives: Imagining the Human at the Frontiers of Biomedicine, (Duke University Press).
105. Steinberg, D.L. (1997), A Most Selective Practice: The Eugenic Logics of IVF', Women's Studies International Forum 2, 33-48.
106. Steinbock, B. (1987), Life Before Birth: The Moral and Legal Status of Embryos and Fetuses, (Oxford University Press).
107. Thompson, C. (2005), Making Parents: the Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies, (MIT Press).
108. Wade, M. (2007), Cloning Pioneer fears Britain will lose out, The Sunday Times (7 January).
109. Walby, C. (2002), Stem Cells, Tissue Cultures and the Production of Biovalue', Health 6, 372-384.
110. Walby, C. and Mitchell, R. (2006), Tissue Economies: Blood, Organs, and Cell Lines in Late Capitalism, (Duke University Press).
111. Warnock, M. et al. (1984), Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology, (Cmnd 9214) (HMSO).
112. White, E. (2008), Stem Cells could Finish Diseases, The Sun (22 May).
113. Wolpert, L. (2007), Maturity at Last in the Genetic Science Debate?, The Times (5 September).
114. Wright, J. (2008), Rift grows as Embryo Laws nudge Ethical Boundaries, The Times (May 10).
115. Williamson, L., Fox, M. and McLean, S. (2007), The Regulation of Xenotransplantation in the United Kingdom After UKXIRA: Legal and Ethical Issues, Journal of Law and Society 34:4, 441-464.
116. Yeoman, F. and Henderson, M. (2007), Doctors' Rebellion forces Embryos Research U-turn, The Times (9 October).