Epistemic value theory and the digital divide

Information Technology and Social Justice

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 29-46

  Fallis, Don ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899222273     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-968-7.ch002     Document Type: Chapter

References (48)

1. Broome, J. (1991). Weighing goods. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
2. Brown, M. F. (2003). Who owns native culture? Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
3. Camp, L. J., & Tsang, R. P. (2000). Universal service in a ubiquitous digital network. Ethics and Information Technology, 2, 211-221.
4. Chabrán, R. (2001). Immigrants, global digital economies, cyber segmentation, and emergent information services. In S. Luévano-Molina (ed.), Immigrant politics and the public library (pp. 131-140). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
5. Chisholm, R. (1977). Theory of knowledge. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6. Compaine, B. M. (2001). Declare the war won. In B. M. Compaine (Ed.), The digital divide: Facing a crisis or creating a myth? (pp. 315-335). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
7. De George, R. T. (2003). The ethics of information technology and business. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
8. Doctor, R. D. (1992). Social equity and information technologies: Moving toward information democracy. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 27, 43-96.
9. Egan, M., & Shera, J. (1952). Foundations of a theory of bibliography. Library Quarterly, 44, 125-137.
10. Ekelund, R. B. (1970). Price discrimination and product differentiation in economic theory: An early analysis. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 268-278.
11. Erdelez, S., & Houston, R. D. (2004). The digital divide: Who really benefits from the proposed solutions for closing the gap? Journal of Information Ethics, 13, 19-33.
12. Fallis, D. (2000). Veritistic social epistemology and information science. Social Epistemology, 14, 305-316.
13. Fallis, D. (2002). Goldman on probabilistic inference. Philosophical Studies, 109, 223-240.
14. Fallis, D. (2004a). Social epistemology and the digital divide. In J. Weckert & Y. Al-Saggaf (Eds.), Conferences in research and practice in information technology (Vol. 37, pp. 79-84). Sydney, Australia: Australian Computer Society. Available at http://www.crpit.com/confpapers/CRPITV37Fallis.pdf
15. Fallis, D. (2004b). Epistemic value theory and information ethics. Minds and Machines, 14, 101-117.
16. Fallis, D. (2006). Social epistemology and information science. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 40.
17. Garnham, N. (1999). Amartya Sen's "capabilities" approach to the evaluation of welfare: Its application to communications. In A. Calabrese & J. C. Burgelman (Eds.), Communication, citizenship and social policy (pp. 113-124). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
18. Goldman, A. I. (1987). Foundations of social epistemics. Synthese, 73, 109-144.
19. Goldman, A. I. (1999). Knowledge in a social world. New York: Oxford.
20. Goldman, A. I. (2002). Reply to commentators. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 64, 215-227.
21. Hacker, K. L., & Mason, S. M. (2003). Ethical gaps in studies of the digital divide. Ethics and Information Technology, 5, 99-115.
22. Hamburg, M., Ramist, L. E., & Bommer, M. R. W. (1972). Library objectives and performance measures and their use in decision making. Library Quarterly, 42, 107-128.
23. Harman, G. (1986). Change in view. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
24. Hongladarom, S. (2002). Hope in the information society. Available at http://pioneer.netserv.chula.ac.th/~hsoraj/web/Hope.pdf
25. Hull, B. (2003). ICT and social exclusion: The role of libraries. Telematics and Informatics, 20, 131-142.
26. James, F. (2001, February 7). FCC's Powell makes clear contrast with predecessor. Chicago Tribune.
27. Johnson, D. G. (1991). Equal access to computing, computing expertise, and decision making about computers. In R. Dejoie, G. Fowler, & D. Paradice (Eds.), Ethical issues in information systems (pp. 210-218). Boston: Boyd & Fraser.
28. nd ed.). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
29. Kirkwood, C. W. (1997). Strategic decision making. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.
30. Kolata, G. (2001, December 30). Questions grow over usefulness of some routine cancer tests. New York Times.
31. Levi, I. (1967). Gambling with truth. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
32. Lievrouw, L. A., & Farb, S. E. (2003). Information and equity. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 499-540.
33. Lichtblau, E. (2001, November 18). Rising fears that what we do know can hurt us. Los Angeles Times.
34. Maher, P. (1993). Betting on theories. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35. Moss, J. (2002). Power and the digital divide. Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 159-165.
36. Mueller, M. L. (2001). Universal service policies as wealth redistribution. In B. M. Compaine (Ed.), The digital divide: Facing a crisis or creating a myth? (pp. 179-187). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
37. Nozick, R. (1993). The nature of rationality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
38. Papineau, D. (2000). The evolution of knowledge. In P. Carruthers & A. Chamberlain (Eds.), Evolution and the human mind (pp. 170-206). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39. Quine, W. V. O. (1969). Epistemology naturalized. In Ontological relativity and other essays (pp. 69-90). New York: Columbia University.
40. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
41. Rescher, N. (1989). Cognitive economy. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh.
42. Rogers, N. (1992). Dirt and disease. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.
43. Sartwell, C. (1992). Why knowledge is merely true belief. Journal of Philosophy, 89, 167-180.
44. Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. R. (1999). Information rules. Boston: Harvard Business School.
45. Solnick, S. J., & Hemenway, D. (1998). Is more always better?: A survey on positional concerns. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 37, 373-383.
46. Tichenor, P. J., Donohue, G. A., & Olien, C. N. (1970). Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34, 159-170.
47. United Nations. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights. Available at http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html
48. van den Hoven, M. J. (1995). Equal access and social justice: Information as a primary good. In ETHICOMP95: An International Conference on the Ethi cal Issues of Using Information Technology (pp. 1-17). Leicester, UK: De Montfort University.