Failing the disabled community: The continuing problem of web accessibility

Advances in Universal Web Design and Evaluation: Research, Trends and Opportunities

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 25-41

  Kreps, David ^a   Adam, Alison ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899210395     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-096-7.ch002     Document Type: Chapter

References (19)

1. Blair, P. (2004). A review of free, online accessibility tools. Retrieved 2004, from http://www.webaim.org
2. CabinetOffice. (2003). The guidelines for UK government websites. TSO.
3. CAST. (2004). Bobby. Watchfire Corporation. Retrieved 2004, from http://www.watchfire.com/bobby/
4. Connecticut. (2004). Accessibility tools. State of Connecticut Web Accessibility Committee. Retrieved 2004, from http://www.cmac.state.ct.ud/access/tools.html
5. Council of Europe. (2003). Council resolution on the implementation of the eEurope 2005 Action Plan. Retrieved 2005, from http://www.eu.int/information_society/eeurope/2005/doc/all_about/resolution.doc
6. DRC. (2002). Disability Discrimination Act: Code of Practice UK Act of Parliament 2008_223. London: Disability Rights Commission. Retrieved 2005, from http://www.drc-gb.org/thelaw/practice.asp
7. DRC. (2004). The Web: Access and inclusion for disabled people. London: Disability Rights Commission. Retrieved 2005, from http://www.drc-gb.org/library/webaccessibility.asp
8. eEnvoy. (2004). eGIF v6. eGovernment Interoperability Framework. UK: Office of the eEnvoy. Retrieved from http://www.govtalk.gov.uk/documents/e-gifv6-0.doc
9. e-Government Unit. (2005). eAccessibility of public sector services in the European Union. Retrieved 2005, from http://www.cabinet.gov.uk/egovernment/resources/eaccessibility/content.asp
10. EU. (2005). eInclusion. Retrieved 2005, from http://www.europa.eu.int/information_society/soccul/einc/index_en.htm
11. EUParliament. (2002). European Parliament resolution on the Commission communication eEurope 2002:Accessibility of public Web sites and their content. (COM(2001) 529 - C5-0074/2002 -2002/2032(COS)). Retrieved 2005, from http://europa.eu.int/information_society/topics/citizens/accessibility/web/wai_2002/ep_res_web_wai_2002/index_en.htm
12. EUParliament. (2003). Council resolution on the implementation of the eEurope 2005 Action Plan. Retrieved 2005, from http://www.eu.int/information_society/eeurope/2005/doc/all_about/resolution.doc
13. EuroAccessibility. (2003). Retrieved 2005, from http://www.europaccessibility.org
14. Isolani. (2003). Weblogs: Web Accessibility. Retrieved 2005, from http://www.isolani.co.uk/blog/access/MoreDetailOnRnibLegalAction
15. UK Parliament. (2003). Draft Disability Discrimination Bill. Retrieved 2006, from http://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts2005/20050013.htm
16. W3C. (1999). Web content accessibility guidelines 1.0. WAI - Wendy Chisholm, Trace R & D Center, University of Wisconsin - Madison; Gregg Vanderheiden, Trace R & D Center, University of Wisconsin - Madison; Ian Jacobs, W3C. Retrieved 2004, from http://www.w3.org/WAI
17. WAI. (2004). Evaluation, repair, and transformation tools for Web content accessibility. Retrieved 2005, from http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/existingtools.html
18. Watchfire. (2005). Retrieved 2005, from http://www.webxact.com
19. Witt, N., & McDermott, A. (2004). Web site accessibility: What logo will we use today? British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 45.