Colorado potato beetle manipulates plant defenses in local and systemic leaves

Plant Signaling and Behavior

Volumn 8, Issue 12, 2013, Pages

  Chung, Seung Ho ^a   Rosa, Cristina ^a   Hoover, Kelli ^a   Luthe, Dawn S ^a   Felton, Gary W ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Induced defenses; Insect symbionts; Plant microbe insect interactions; Systemic response; Tomato

Indexed keywords

ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT;

ANIMAL; BEETLE; DRUG EFFECTS; IMMUNOLOGY; LARVA; PARASITOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT IMMUNITY; PLANT LEAF; POTATO; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; BEETLES; COLORADO; LARVA; PLANT IMMUNITY; PLANT LEAVES; SOLANUM TUBEROSUM;

EID: 84899134072     PISSN: 15592316     EISSN: 15592324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/psb.27592     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Howe GA, Jander G. Plant immunity to insect herbivores. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2008; 59:41-66; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092825
2. Wu J, Baldwin IT. New insights into plant responses to the attack from insect herbivores. Annu Rev Genet 2010; 44:1-24; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-102209-163500
3. Pieterse CMJ, Van der Does D, Zamioudis C, Leon-Reyes A, Van Wees SCM. Hormonal modulation of plant immunity. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2012; 28:489-521; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154055
4. Thaler JS, Humphrey PT, Whiteman NK. Evolution of jasmonate and salicylate signal crosstalk. Trends Plant Sci 2012; 17:260-70; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2012.02.010
5. Hogenhout SA, Bos JIB. Effector proteins that modulate plant-insect interactions. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2011; 14:422-8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2011.05.003
6. Walling LL. Adaptive defense responses to pathogens and insects. In: Van Loon LC, ed. Adv. Bot. Res. London: Academic Press; 2009, 551-612.
7. Chung SH, Felton GW. Specificity of induced resistance in tomato against specialist lepidopteran and coleopteran species. J Chem Ecol 2011; 37:378-86; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10886-011-9937-0
8. Bos JIB, Prince D, Pitino M, Maffei ME, Win J, Hogenhout SA. A functional genomics approach identifies candidate effectors from the aphid species Myzus persicae (green peach aphid). PLoS Genet 2010; 6:e1001216; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001216
9. Felton GW, Tumlinson JH. Plant-insect dialogs: complex interactions at the plant-insect interface. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2008; 11:457-63; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2008.07.001
10. Wu S, Peiffer M, Luthe DS, Felton GW. ATP hydrolyzing salivary enzymes of caterpillars suppress plant defenses. PLoS One 2012; 7:e41947; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041947
11. Musser RO, Hum-Musser SM, Eichenseer H, Peiffer M, Ervin G, Murphy JB, Felton GW. Herbivory: caterpillar saliva beats plant defences. Nature 2002; 416:599-600; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/416599a
12. Weech M-H, Chapleau M, Pan L, Ide C, Bede JC. Caterpillar saliva interferes with induced Arabidopsis thaliana defence responses via the systemic acquired resistance pathway. J Exp Bot 2008; 59:2437-48; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ern108
13. Douglas AE. Microbial brokers of insect-plant interactions revisited. J Chem Ecol 2013; 39:952-61; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10886-013-0308-x
14. Hansen AK, Moran NA. The impact of microbial symbionts on host plant utilization by herbivorous insects. Mol Ecol 2013; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mec.12421
15. Feldhaar H. Bacterial symbionts as mediators of ecologically important traits of insect hosts. Ecol Entomol 2011; 36:533-43; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.2011.01318.x
16. Chung SH, Rosa C, Scully ED, Peiffer M, Tooker JF, Hoover K, Luthe DS, Felton GW. Herbivore exploits orally secreted bacteria to suppress plant defenses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013; 110:15728-33; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1308867110
17. Durrant WE, Dong X. Systemic acquired resistance. Annu Rev Phytopathol 2004; 42:185-209; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.040803.140421
18. Mishina TE, Zeier J. The Arabidopsis flavindependent monooxygenase FMO1 is an essential component of biologically induced systemic acquired resistance. Plant Physiol 2006; 141:1666-75; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.106.081257
19. Zhao Y, Thilmony R, Bender CL, Schaller A, He SY, Howe GA. Virulence systems of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato promote bacterial speck disease in tomato by targeting the jasmonate signaling pathway. Plant J 2003; 36:485-99; http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01895.x
20. Cui J, Bahrami AK, Pringle EG, Hernandez-Guzman G, Bender CL, Pierce NE, Ausubel FM. Pseudomonas syringae manipulates systemic plant defenses against pathogens and herbivores. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102:1791-6; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0409450102
21. Green TR, Ryan CA. Wound-induced proteinase inhibitor in plant leaves: a possible defense mechanism against insects. Science 1972; 175:776-7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.175.4023.776
22. Rodriguez-Saona CR, Musser RO, Vogel H, Hum-Musser SM, Thaler JS. Molecular, biochemical, and organismal analyses of tomato plants simultaneously attacked by herbivores from two feeding guilds. J Chem Ecol 2010; 36:1043-57; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10886-010-9854-7
23. Park S-W, Kaimoyo E, Kumar D, Mosher S, Klessig DF. Methyl salicylate is a critical mobile signal for plant systemic acquired resistance. Science 2007; 318:113-6; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1147113
24. Schilmiller AL, Howe GA. Systemic signaling in the wound response. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2005; 8:369-77; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2005.05.008