Unrepaired DNA damage facilitates elimination of uniparental chromosomes in interspecific hybrid cells

Cell Cycle

Volumn 13, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 1345-1356

  Wang, Zheng ^a   Yin, Hao ^a   Lv, Lei ^a   Feng, Yingying ^a   Chen, Shaopeng ^b   Liang, Junting ^b   Huang, Yun ^a   Jiang, Xiaohua ^a   Jiang, Hanwei ^a   Bukhari, Ihtisham ^a   Wu, Lijun ^b   Cooke, Howard J ^a,c   Shi, Qinghua ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

^b HEFEI INSTITUTES OF PHYSICAL SCIENCE   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cell cycle regulation; Chromosomal elimination; Chromosome instability; DNA damage repair; Hybrid cells

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CARCINOGENESIS; CELL CULTURE; CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; CELL CYCLE G1 PHASE; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CELL DIVISION; CELL FUSION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CHROMOSOMAL INSTABILITY; CHROMOSOME LOSS; CLONOGENESIS; COMET ASSAY; DAUGHTER CELL; DNA DAMAGE; DNA DAMAGE CHECKPOINT; EPITHELIUM CELL; FLUORESCENCE ACTIVATED CELL SORTING; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN CHROMOSOME; HYBRID CELL; INTERSPECIFIC HYBRID; IRRADIATION; METAPHASE; MICROMANIPULATION; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; UNIPARENTAL CHROMOSOME; 3T3 CELL LINE; ANIMAL; CYTOLOGY; DNA REPAIR; GENETICS; HCT116 CELL LINE; MITOSIS;

ANIMALS; CELL FUSION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CHROMOSOMAL INSTABILITY; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; HCT116 CELLS; HUMANS; HYBRID CELLS; MICE; MITOSIS; NIH 3T3 CELLS;

EID: 84899125741     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.28296     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Matsuya Y, Green H, Basilico C. Properties and uses of human-mouse hybrid cell lines. Nature 1968; 220:1199-202; PMID:5725979; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ 2201199a0
2. Matsuya Y, Green H. Somatic cell hybrid between the established human line D98 (presumptive HeLa) and 3T3. Science 1969; 163:697-8; PMID:5762936; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.163.3868.697
3. Migeon BR, Miller CS. Human-mouse somatic cell hybrids with single human chromosome (group E): link with thymidine kinase activity. Science 1968; 162:1005-6; PMID:5698836; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3857.1005
4. Nabholz M, Miggiano V, Bodmer W. Genetic analysis with human - mouse somatic cell hybrids. Nature 1969; 223:358-63; PMID:4309885; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/223358a0
5. Nowak-Imialek M, Kues WA, Rudolph C, Schlegelberger B, Taylor U, Carnwath JW, Niemann H. Preferential loss of porcine chromosomes in reprogrammed interspecies cell hybrids. Cell Reprogram 2010; 12:55-65; PMID:20132013; http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cell.2009.0045
6. Yerle M, Echard G, Robic A, Mairal A, Dubut-Fontana C, Riquet J, Pinton P, Milan D, Lahbib-Mansais Y, Gellin J. A somatic cell hybrid panel for pig regional gene mapping characterized by molecular cytogenetics. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1996; 73:194-202; PMID:8697807; http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000134338
7. Zijlstra C, Bosma AA, de Haan NA. Comparative study of pig-rodent somatic cell hybrids. Anim Genet 1994; 25:319-27; PMID:7818166; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1111/j.1365-2052.1994.tb00365.x
8. Wasmuth JJ. Overview of somatic cell hybrid mapping. Current protocols in human genetics / editorial board, Jonathan L Haines [et al. 2001; Chapter 3:Unit 3 1.
9. Allikmets R, Kashuba VI, Huebner K, LaForgia S, Kisselev LL, Klein G, Dean M, Zabarovsky ER. Mapping of 22 Notl linking clones on human chromosome 3 by polymerase chain reaction and somatic cell hybrid panels. Chromosome Res 1996; 4:33-7; PMID:8653266; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02254942
10. Apte SS, Mattei MG, Olsen BR. Mapping of the human BAX gene to chromosome 19q13.3-q13.4 and isolation of a novel alternatively spliced transcript, BAX delta. Genomics 1995; 26:592-4; PMID:7607685; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0888- 7543(95)80180-T
11. Hafezparast M, Cole CG, Kaur GP, Athwal RS, Jeggo PA. An extended panel of hamster-human hybrids for chromosome 2q. Somat Cell Mol Genet 1994; 20:541-8; PMID:7892651; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02255844
12. Kastury K, Taylor WE, Gutierrez M, Ramirez L, Coucke PJ, Van Hauwe P, Van Camp G, Bhasin S. Chromosomal mapping of two members of the human dynein gene family to chromosome regions 7p15 and 11q13 near the deafness loci DFNA 5 and DFNA 11. Genomics 1997; 44:362-4; PMID:9325061; http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/geno. 1997.4903
13. Fujiwara A, Abe S, Yamaha E, Yamazaki F, Yoshida MC. Uniparental chromosome elimination in the early embryogenesis of the inviable salmonid hybrids between masu salmon female and rainbow trout male. Chromosoma 1997; 106:44-52; PMID:9169586; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004120050223
14. Iwamatsu T, Uwa H, Inden A, Hirata K. Experiments on Interspecific Hybridization between Oryzias-Latipes and Oryzias-Celebensis. Zoolog Sci 1984; 1:653-63
15. Iwamatsu T, Watanabe T, Hori R, Lam TJ, Saxena OP. Experiments on Interspecific Hybridization between Oryzias-Melastigma and Oryzias Javanicus. Zoolog Sci 1986; 3:287-93
16. Sakai C, Konno F, Nakano O, Iwai T, Yokota T, Lee J, Nishida-Umehara C, Kuroiwa A, Matsuda Y, Yamashita M. Chromosome elimination in the interspecific hybrid medaka between Oryzias latipes and O. hubbsi. Chromosome Res 2007; 15:697-709; PMID:17603754; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10577-007-1155-9
17. Sakai C, Konno F, Nakano O, Iwai T, Yokota T, Lee J, Nishida-Umehara C, Kuroiwa A, Matsuda Y, Yamashita M. Chromosome elimination in the interspecific hybrid medaka between Oryzias latipes and O. hubbsi. Chromosome Res 2007; 15:697-709; PMID:17603754; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10577-007-1155-9
18. Ishii T, Ueda T, Tanaka H, Tsujimoto H. Chromosome elimination by wide hybridization between Triticeae or oat plant and pearl millet: pearl millet chromosome dynamics in hybrid embryo cells. Chromosome Res 2010; 18:821-31; PMID:20953694; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10577-010-9158-3
19. Jin W, Melo JR, Nagaki K, Talbert PB, Henikoff S, Dawe RK, Jiang J. Maize centromeres: organization and functional adaptation in the genetic background of oat. Plant Cell 2004; 16:571-81; PMID:14973167; http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/ tpc.018937
20. Kim NS, Armstrong KC, Fedak G, Ho K, Park NI. A microsatellite sequence from the rice blast fungus (Magnaporthe grisea) distinguishes between the centromeres of Hordeum vulgare and H. bulbosum in hybrid plants. Genome 2002; 45:165-74; PMID:11908659; http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/g01-129
21. Mochida K, Tsujimoto H, Sasakuma T. Confocal analysis of chromosome behavior in wheat x maize zygotes. Genome 2004; 47:199-205; PMID:15060616; http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/g03-123
22. RA F. Tissue-specific elimination of alternative whole parental genomes in one barley hybrid. Chromosoma 1983; 88:386-93; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ BF00285861
23. Schwarzacher Robinson TFR, Smith JB, Bennett MD. Genotypic control of centromere positions of parental genomes in Hordeum X Secale hybrid metaphases. J Cell Sci 1987; 87:291-304
24. Dunwell JM. Haploids in flowering plants: origins and exploitation. Plant Biotechnol J 2010; 8:377-424; PMID:20233334; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 7652.2009.00498.x
25. Ravi M, Chan SWL. Haploid plants produced by centromere-mediated genome elimination. Nature 2010; 464:615-8; PMID:20336146; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nature08842
26. Gupta SB. Duration of Mitotic Cycle and Regulation of DNA Replication in Nicotiana Plumbaginifolia and a Hybrid Derivative of N Tabacum Showing Chromosome Instability. Can J Genet Cytol 1969; 11:133
27. Bennett MD, Finch RA, Barclay IR. Time Rate and Mechanism of Chromosome Elimination in Hordeum Hybrids. Chromosoma 1976; 54:175-200; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00292839
28. Laurie DABM. The timing of chromosome elimination in hexaploid wheat x maize crosses. Genome 1989; 32:953-61; http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/g89-537
29. Gernand D, Rutten T, Pickering R, Houben A. Elimination of chromosomes in Hordeum vulgare x H. bulbosum crosses at mitosis and interphase involves micronucleus formation and progressive heterochromatinization. Cytogenet Genome Res 2006; 114:169-74; PMID:16825770; http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000093334
30. Gernand D, Rutten T, Varshney A, Rubtsova M, Prodanovic S, Brüss C, Kumlehn J, Matzk F, Houben A. Uniparental chromosome elimination at mitosis and interphase in wheat and pearl millet crosses involves micronucleus formation, progressive heterochromatinization, and DNA fragmentation. Plant Cell 2005; 17:2431-8; PMID:16055632; http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.105.034249
31. Davies DR. Chromosome elimination in inter specific hybrids. Heredity 1974; 32:267-70; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1974.30
32. Sanei M, Pickering R, Kumke K, Nasuda S, Houben A. Loss of centromeric histone H3 (CENH3) from centromeres precedes uniparental chromosome elimination in interspecific barley hybrids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011; 108:E498-505; PMID:21746892; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1103190108
33. Zelesco PA, Graves JA. Chromosome segregation from cell hybrids. IV. Movement and position of segregant set chromosomes in early-phase interspecific cell hybrids. J Cell Sci 1988; 89:49-56; PMID:3417792
34. Vig BK, Athwal RS. Sequence of centromere separation: separation in a quasi-stable mouse-human somatic cell hybrid. Chromosoma 1989; 98:167-73; PMID:2582897; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00329680
35. Geigl JB, Obenauf AC, Schwarzbraun T, Speicher MR. Defining 'chromosomal instability'. Trends Genet 2008; 24:64-9; PMID:18192061; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.tig.2007.11.006
36. Gordon DJ, Resio B, Pellman D. Causes and consequences of aneuploidy in cancer. Nat Rev Genet 2012; 13:189-203; PMID:22269907
37. Vitale I, Senovilla L, Jemaà M, Michaud M, Galluzzi L, Kepp O, Nanty L, Criollo A, Rello-Varona S, Manic G, et al. Multipolar mitosis of tetraploid cells: inhibition by p53 and dependency on Mos. EMBO J 2010; 29:1272-84; PMID:20186124; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2010.11
38. Falck GC, Catalán J, Norppa H. Nature of anaphase laggards and micronuclei in female cytokinesis-blocked lymphocytes. Mutagenesis 2002; 17:111-7; PMID:11880539; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mutage/17.2.111
39. Forment JV, Kaidi A, Jackson SP. Chromothripsis and cancer: causes and consequences of chromosome shattering. Nat Rev Cancer 2012; 12:663-70; PMID:22972457; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrc3352
40. Asaithamby A, Chen DJ. Cellular responses to DNA double-strand breaks after low-dose gamma-irradiation. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37:3912-23; PMID:19401436; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp237
41. Postow L. Destroying the ring: Freeing DNA from Ku with ubiquitin. FEBS Lett 2011; 585:2876-82; PMID:21640108; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2011. 05.046
42. Roos WP, Kaina B. DNA damage-induced cell death by apoptosis. Trends Mol Med 2006; 12:440-50; PMID:16899408; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2006.07. 007
43. Giglia-Mari G, Zotter A, Vermeulen W. DNA damage response. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2011; 3:a000745; PMID:20980439; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/ cshperspect.a000745
44. Subrahmanyam NCKK. Selective chromosome elimination during haploid formation in barley following interspecific hybridization. Chromosoma 1973; 42:111-2; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00320934
45. Cieplinski W, Reardon P, Testa MA. Non-random human chromosome distribution in human-mouse myeloma somatic cell hybrids. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1983; 35:93-9; PMID:6851676; http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000131848
46. Sengupta K, Camps J, Mathews P, Barenboim-Stapleton L, Nguyen QT, Difilippantonio MJ, Ried T. Position of human chromosomes is conserved in mouse nuclei indicating a species-independent mechanism for maintaining genome organization. Chromosoma 2008; 117:499-509; PMID:18563425; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1007/s00412-008-0171-7
47. Corredor E, Díez M, Shepherd K, Naranjo T. The positioning of rye homologous chromosomes added to wheat through the cell cycle in somatic cells untreated and treated with colchicine. Cytogenet Genome Res 2005; 109:112-9; PMID:15753566; http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000082389
48. Gleba YY, Parokonny A, Kotov V, Negrutiu I, Momot V. Spatial separation of parental genomes in hybrids of somatic plant cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1987; 84:3709-13; PMID:16593838; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.84.11.3709
49. Leitch AR, Schwarzacher T, Mosgoller W, Bennett MD, Heslopharrison JS. Parental Genomes Are Separated Throughout the Cell-Cycle in a Plant Hybrid. Chromosoma 1991; 101:206-13; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00365152
50. Mayer W, Fundele R, Haaf T. Spatial separation of parental genomes during mouse interspecific (Mus musculus x M. spretus) spermiogenesis. Chromosome Res 2000; 8:555-8; PMID:11032324; http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009227924235
51. Cremer T, Cremer C. Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells. Nat Rev Genet 2001; 2:292-301; PMID:11283701; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35066075
52. Gerlich D, Beaudouin J, Kalbfuss B, Daigle N, Eils R, Ellenberg J. Global chromosome positions are transmitted through mitosis in mammalian cells. Cell 2003; 112:751-64; PMID:12654243; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00189-2
53. Hübner MR, Spector DL. Chromatin dynamics. Annu Rev Biophys 2010; 39:471-89; PMID:20462379; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biophys.093008. 131348
54. Ohashi H, Wakui K, Ogawa K, Okano T, Niikawa N, Fukushima Y. A stable acentric marker chromosome: possible existence of an intercalary ancient centromere at distal 8p. Am J Hum Genet 1994; 55:1202-8; PMID:7977381
55. Kanda T, Wahl GM. The dynamics of acentric chromosomes in cancer cells revealed by GFP-based chromosome labeling strategies. J Cell Biochem Suppl 2000; (Suppl 35): 107-14; PMID:11389539; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1097-4644(2000)79: 35+〈107::AID-JCB1133〉3.0.CO;2-Y
56. Mizuno K, Lambert S, Baldacci G, Murray JM, Carr AM. Nearby inverted repeats fuse to generate acentric and dicentric palindromic chromosomes by a replication template exchange mechanism. Genes Dev 2009; 23: 2876-86; PMID:20008937; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1863009
57. Gernand D, Rutten T, Varshney A, Rubtsova M, Prodanovic S, Brüss C, Kumlehn J, Matzk F, Houben A. Uniparental chromosome elimination at mitosis and interphase in wheat and pearl millet crosses involves micronucleus formation, progressive heterochromatinization, and DNA fragmentation. Plant Cell 2005; 17:2431-8; PMID:16055632; http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.105.034249
58. Finn K, Lowndes NF, Grenon M. Eukaryotic DNA damage checkpoint activation in response to doublestrand breaks. Cell Mol Life Sci 2012; 69:1447-73; PMID:22083606; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-011-0875-3
59. Terradas M, Martín M, Tusell L, Genescà A. Genetic activities in micronuclei: is the DNA entrapped in micronuclei lost for the cell? Mutat Res 2010; 705:60-7; PMID:20307686; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. mrrev.2010.03.004
60. You Z, Bailis JM. DNA damage and decisions: CtIP coordinates DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoints. Trends Cell Biol 2010; 20:402-9; PMID:20444606; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2010.04.002
61. Jackson SP, Bartek J. The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature 2009; 461:1071-8; PMID:19847258; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nature08467
62. Grigsby RV, Fairbairn D, O'Neill KL. Differential DNA damage detected in hybridomas. Hybridoma 1993; 12:755-61; PMID:8288274; http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ hyb.1993.12.755
63. Kass EM, Jasin M. Collaboration and competition between DNA double-strand break repair pathways. FEBS Lett 2010; 584:3703-8; PMID:20691183; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2010.07.057
64. Noon AT, Goodarzi AA. 53BP1-mediated DNA double strand break repair: insert bad pun here. DNA Repair (Amst) 2011; 10:1071-6; PMID:21868291; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2011.07.012
65. Zimmermann M, Lottersberger F, Buonomo SB, Sfeir A, de Lange T. 53BP1 regulates DSB repair using Rif1 to control 5′ end resection. Science 2013; 339:700-4; PMID:23306437; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1231573
66. Johnson RT, Rao PN. Mammalian cell fusion: induction of premature chromosome condensation in interphase nuclei. Nature 1970; 226:717-22; PMID:5443247; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/226717a0
67. Crasta K, Ganem NJ, Dagher R, Lantermann AB, Ivanova EV, Pan Y, Nezi L, Protopopov A, Chowdhury D, Pellman D. DNA breaks and chromosome pulverization from errors in mitosis. Nature 2012; 482:53-8; PMID:22258507; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature10802
68. Lv L, Zhang T, Yi Q, Huang Y, Wang Z, Hou H, Zhang H, Zheng W, Hao Q, Guo Z, et al. Tetraploid cells from cytokinesis failure induce aneuploidy and spontaneous transformation of mouse ovarian surface epithelial cells. Cell Cycle 2012; 11:2864-75; PMID:22801546; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.21196
69. Shi Q, Martin RH. Spontaneous frequencies of aneuploid and diploid sperm in 10 normal Chinese men: assessed by multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cytogenet Cell Genet 2000; 90:79-83; PMID:11060453; http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000015668
70. Huang Y, Hou H, Yi Q, Zhang Y, Chen D, Jiang E, Xia Y, Fenech M, Shi Q. The fate of micronucleated cells post X-irradiation detected by live cell imaging. DNA Repair (Amst) 2011; 10:629-38; PMID:21543268; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.dnarep.2011.04.010
71. Bergqvist M, Brattström D, Stålberg M, Vaghef H, Brodin O, Hellman B. Evaluation of radiation-nduced DNA damage and DNA repair in human lung cancer cell lines with different radiosensitivity using alkaline and neutral single cell gel electrophoresis. Cancer Lett 1998; 133:9-18; PMID:9929155; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3835(98)00178-5