Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic cryoablation versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for the treatment of small renal tumors

Journal of Urology

Volumn 191, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 1209-1217

  Klatte, Tobias ^a   Shariat, Shahrokh F ^a   Remzi, Mesut ^b  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b Landesklinikum ^*  (Austria)

Author keywords

cryosurgery; laparoscopy; nephrectomy; postoperative complications; robotics

Indexed keywords

CANCER GROWTH; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER SURGERY; CANCER THERAPY; CRYOABLATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY TUMOR; LAPAROSCOPE; LAPAROSCOPIC CRYOABLATION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; META ANALYSIS; METASTASIS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURE; MULTIMODALITY CANCER THERAPY; NONUROLOGICAL COMPLICATION; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROBOTICS; SAFETY; SMALL RENAL TUMOR; SURGICAL RISK; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT RESPONSE; URINARY TRACT DISEASE; AGE; BLEEDING; DISTANT METASTASIS; LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; ROBOT ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; THROMBOEMBOLISM; TUMOR GROWTH; URINE INCONTINENCE;

CRYOSURGERY; LAPAROSCOPY; NEPHRECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; ROBOTICS;

CRYOSURGERY; HUMANS; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; LAPAROSCOPY; NEPHRECTOMY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84899118605     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: 15273792     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.11.006     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. D.C. Miller, J. Ruterbusch, and J.S. Colt et al. Contemporary clinical epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma: insight from a population based case-control study J Urol 184 2010 2254
2. S.C. Campbell, A.C. Novick, and A. Belldegrun et al. Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass J Urol 182 2009 1271
3. B.R. Lane, S.C. Campbell, and I.S. Gill 10-year oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy J Urol 190 2013 44
4. S.P. Kim, B.C. Leibovich, and N.D. Shah et al. The relationship of postoperative complications with in-hospital outcomes and costs after renal surgery for kidney cancer BJU Int 111 2013 580
5. T. Klatte, B. Grubmüller, and M. Waldert et al. Laparoscopic cryoablation versus partial nephrectomy for the treatment of small renal masses: systematic review and cumulative analysis of observational studies Eur Urol 60 2011 435
6. P. McCulloch, D.G. Altman, and W.B. Campbell et al. No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations Lancet 374 2009 1105
7. P. McCulloch, J.A. Cook, and D.G. Altman et al. IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 1: the idea and development stages BMJ 346 2013 f3012
8. S.M. Donat, M. Diaz, and J.T. Bishoff et al. Follow-up for clinically localized renal neoplasms: AUA guideline J Urol 190 2013 407
9. R.C. Martin 2nd, M.F. Brennan, and D.P. Jaques Quality of complication reporting in the surgical literature Ann Surg 235 2002 803
10. M.M. Desai, M. Aron, and I.S. Gill Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic cryoablation for the small renal tumor Urology 66 2005 23
11. A.M. Emara, S.S. Kommu, and R.G. Hindley et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy vs laparoscopic cryoablation for the small renal mass: redefining the minimally invasive 'gold standard' BJU Int 113 2014 92
12. J. Guillotreau, G.P. Haber, and R. Autorino et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic cryoablation for the small renal mass Eur Urol 61 2012 899
13. G.P. Haber, M.C. Lee, and S. Crouzet et al. Tumour in solitary kidney: laparoscopic partial nephrectomy vs laparoscopic cryoablation BJU Int 109 2012 118
14. G. Haramis, J.A. Graversen, and A.C. Mues et al. Retrospective comparison of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic renal cryoablation for small (<3.5 cm) cortical renal masses J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22 2012 152
15. G. Hruby, K. Reisiger, and R. Venkatesh et al. Comparison of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and laparoscopic cryoablation for renal hilar tumors Urology 67 2006 50
16. F. Kim, A. Campagna, and E.V. Gewehr et al. Management of small renal masses < 4cm with laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery (partial nephrectomy with hilar control, parenchyma compression partial nephrectomy and cryoablation) J Endourol 21 2007 A191
17. H.B. Lian, H.Q. Guo, and W.D. Gan et al. A retrospective study comparing the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic cryoablation and partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 48 2010 834
18. Y.C. Lin, B. Turna, and R. Frota et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic cryoablation for multiple ipsilateral renal tumors Eur Urol 53 2008 1210
19. G. Lughezzani, A. Cestari, and N.M. Buffi et al. Nephron sparing surgery for the treatment of small renal masses: comparison between open partial nephrectomy, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and laparoscopic cryoablation Eur Urol Suppl 8 2009 126
20. R.L. O'Malley, A.D. Berger, and J.A. Kanofsky et al. A matched-cohort comparison of laparoscopic cryoablation and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for treating renal masses BJU Int 99 2007 395
21. B. Turna, J.H. Kaouk, and R. Frota et al. Minimally invasive nephron sparing management for renal tumors in solitary kidneys J Urol 182 2009 2150
22. A.A. Nisbet, J.M. Rieder, and V.Q. Tran et al. Decision tree for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic renal cryoablation for small renal masses J Endourol 23 2009 431
23. P. Khairy, P. Chauvet, and J. Lehmann et al. Lower incidence of thrombus formation with cryoenergy versus radiofrequency catheter ablation Circulation 107 2003 2045
24. D.C. Kang, D.A. Palmer, and M. Zarei et al. A systematic review of the quality of evidence of ablative therapy for small renal masses J Urol 187 2012 44
25. C.J. Long, D.J. Canter, and M.C. Smaldone et al. Role of tumor location in selecting patients for percutaneous versus surgical cryoablation of renal masses Can J Urol 19 2012 6417
26. G.H. Guyatt, A.D. Oxman, and R. Kunz et al. What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ 336 2008 995
27. S. MacLennan, M. Imamura, and M.C. Lapitan et al. Systematic review of perioperative and quality-of-life outcomes following surgical management of localised renal cancer Eur Urol 62 2012 1097
28. D.A. Kunkle, B.L. Egleston, and R.G. Uzzo Excise, ablate or observe: the small renal mass dilemma-a meta-analysis and review J Urol 179 2008 1227
29. T.D. Atwell, G.D. Schmit, and S.A. Boorjian et al. Percutaneous ablation of renal masses measuring 3.0 cm and smaller: comparative local control and complications after radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation AJR Am J Roentgenol 200 2013 461
30. E.E. Young, S.M. Castle, and V. Gorbatiy et al. Comparison of safety, renal function outcomes and efficacy of laparoscopic and percutaneous radio frequency ablation of renal masses J Urol 187 2012 1177