Imbalance in individual researcher's peer review activities quantified for Four British Ecological Society Journals, 2003-2010

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2014, Pages

  Petchey, Owen L ^a   Fox, Jeremy W ^b   Haddon, Lindsay ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^c BRITISH ECOLOGICAL SOCIETY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA BASE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PEER REVIEW; UNITED KINGDOM;

DATABASES, FACTUAL; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH PERSONNEL;

EID: 84899114683     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092896     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Baveye PC (2010) Sticker Shock and Looming Tsunami. J Sch Publ 41: 191-215.
2. Vines T, Rieseberg L, Smith H (2010) No crisis in supply of peer reviewers. Nature 468: 1041.
3. McPeek MA, DeAngelis DL, Shaw RG, Moore AJ, Rausher MD, et al. (2009) The Golden Rule of Reviewing. Am Nat 173: E155-E158.
4. Riisgård HU (2003) Misuse of the peer-review system: time for countermeasures? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 258: 297-309.
5. Akst J (2010) I hate your paper. Scientist 24: 36-41.
6. Siegel D, Baveye P (2010) Battling the paper glut. Science (80-) 329: 1466.
7. Hardin G (1968) The trajedy of the commons. Science (80-) 162: 1243-1248.
8. Hochberg ME, Chase JM, Gotelli NJ, Hastings A, Naeem S (2009) The tragedy of the reviewer commons. Ecol Lett 12: 2-4.
9. Hardin G (1998) Extensions of "The Tragedy of the Commons." Science (80-) 280: 682-683.
10. Larsen P, Riisgard H (2000) The peer-review system: time for re-assessment? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 192: 305-313.
11. Lortie CJ (2012) May the odds be ever in your favor: a brief comment on the review games in ecology. Immed Sci Ecol 1: 1-6.
12. Veríssimo D, Roberts DL (2013) The academic welfare state: making peer-review count. Trends Ecol Evol: 623-624.
13. Waltman L (2012) An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing. J Informetr 6: 700-711.
14. Hagen NT (2013) Harmonic coauthor credit: A parsimonious quantification of the byline hierarchy. J Informetr 7: 784-791.
15. Trivers R (1971) The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q Rev Biol 46: 35-57.
16. Rand DG, Nowak M (2013) Human cooperation. Trends Cogn Sci 17: 413-425.
17. Cintas P (2010) Increasing visibility and recognition of reviewers - is a Peer Review Index a possible solution? Elsevier Rev Updat: 2-3.
18. Hirsch J (2005) An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci ... 102: 16569-16572.