-
1
-
-
0141731407
-
Editorial
-
Anonymous (2003) Editorial. Aquac Nutr 9:65
-
(2003)
Aquac Nutr
, vol.9
, pp. 65
-
-
-
2
-
-
0025015166
-
The evolution of editorial peer review
-
Burnham JC (1990) The evolution of editorial peer review. J Am Med Assoc 263:1323-1329
-
(1990)
J Am Med Assoc
, vol.263
, pp. 1323-1329
-
-
Burnham, J.C.1
-
3
-
-
0141508084
-
A message from the editor: Reviewing for L&O
-
Fee E (1998) A message from the editor: reviewing for L&O. ASLO Bulletin 7(3):5
-
(1998)
ASLO Bulletin
, vol.7
, Issue.3
, pp. 5
-
-
Fee, E.1
-
4
-
-
0024033673
-
The scientific process - Its links, functions and problems
-
Kinne O (1988) The scientific process - its links, functions and problems. Naturwissenschaften 75:275-279
-
(1988)
Naturwissenschaften
, vol.75
, pp. 275-279
-
-
Kinne, O.1
-
5
-
-
0033519442
-
Electronic publishing in science: Changes and risks
-
Kinne O (1999) Electronic publishing in science: changes and risks. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 180:1-5
-
(1999)
Mar Ecol Prog Ser
, vol.180
, pp. 1-5
-
-
Kinne, O.1
-
6
-
-
0038717107
-
The scientific process: New forces attempt to enter the scene
-
Kinne O (2003) The scientific process: new forces attempt to enter the scene. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 254:1
-
(2003)
Mar Ecol Prog Ser
, vol.254
, pp. 1
-
-
Kinne, O.1
-
7
-
-
0025020192
-
Peer review in 18th-century scientific journalism
-
Kronick DA (1990) Peer review in 18th-century scientific journalism. JAMA 263:1321-1329
-
(1990)
JAMA
, vol.263
, pp. 1321-1329
-
-
Kronick, D.A.1
-
8
-
-
0344160900
-
Fifth international congress on peer review and biomedical publication. Call for research
-
Rennie D, Flanagin A, Smith R, Smith J (2003) Fifth international congress on peer review and biomedical publication. Call for research. JAMA 289:1438
-
(2003)
JAMA
, vol.289
, pp. 1438
-
-
Rennie, D.1
Flanagin, A.2
Smith, R.3
Smith, J.4
-
9
-
-
0141508083
-
The peer-review system: Time for reassessment?
-
Riisgård HU (2000) The peer-review system: time for reassessment? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 192:305-313
-
(2000)
Mar Ecol Prog Ser
, vol.192
, pp. 305-313
-
-
Riisgård, H.U.1
-
10
-
-
0028290259
-
How well does a journal's peer review process function?
-
Sweitzer BJ, Cullen DJ (1994) How well does a journal's peer review process function? JAMA 272:152-153
-
(1994)
JAMA
, vol.272
, pp. 152-153
-
-
Sweitzer, B.J.1
Cullen, D.J.2
|